Missokyst
Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006 Status: offline
|
For me the difference is in what kind of relationship it is. When I was married we tried all sorts of things to salvage the marriage. Many things we tried only made things worse in my opinion, but some things did help. My intent when I got married was to stick it out. His intent as it turns out was based on his experience, both his parents were serial divorcee's. The final straw for me was when he told me I had to change my religion and become a Baptist so that I would understand that the man was meant to be in charge. I did not understand that because for 7 yrs I got up when ever he wished, to cook him dinner, or open my legs for sex. His comment about being in charge had more to do with my no longer accepting his extramartial affairs. For me, that was the final insult. I tried many things to please him and gave it what I had in me. I have chosen to remain single ever since my divorce. Not because I don't believe in it, but because I do. Marriage for me is ideally a life time committment. I have told anyone I become involved with that if it ever did come down to marriage only ONE of us gets out alive. <g> It has kept the offers down to 3 more in my life.. though I chose never to take that step again. But.. in these brief alliances I see online, the quick committments, the instant collars, and the "I have never met him but I love him", connections, I can see the value in moving on quickly. For me the main reason is that the longer you are with someone, the longer it takes to heal. There is a song I love which says.. If it makes you happy, then why are you so sad? If it makes you more sad than happy, it is time to leave. Kyst
|