LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
Yep - its absolutely sickening. No one would take the slightest bit of interest (aside from hounding me to the grave over any unpaid taxes) if my business went bust even if it were not my fault. If it went bust because of my negligence, act or omission then I could expect serious questions and penalties over it. Yet, this lot get away with it. But there's another side to it - and not the "we must stabilise the financial system" side either; the villains of the piece here are the same who handle our pension funds and savings. Our pension funds and savings though are not in little files marked with our names on them, but consist of the assets of these companies - if the companies go bust then the assets are realised to pay off creditors (in the UK in any case). In the UK (and US may be different) Government liabilities come first - tax and whatnot. Then any secured creditors/ mortgagees - which may (or may not, depending on local law) include some safeguarded amount of what they owe you as an individual (£35k in UK I believe). Then unsecured creditors - the employees included. Trouble is, the money usually runs out well before unsecured creditors are paid out - and sometimes higher up the chain. Receivers' and administrators' bills only add to the shortfall - as would in these cases a sudden realisation of assets - basically, a flood of shareholdings and investments into the market at knock down prices which would then drive the market in general down, affecting everyone's investments - that is our savings and pensions. My opinion is, hang the boards of these companies for their negligence, acts and omissions and have their personal assets distributed to pay the employees. Let the shareholders of these companies take whatever hit is coming to them, but stabilise the system for the sake of we ordinary mortals. Postpone any tax liabilities to enable these companies to get back on their feet - at interest of course, as they would charge. And as for these "bad mortgages" - the government would do better to buy the properties out - at repossession/auction values and have the occupiers remain in them - subdiving them where possible for two families, paying market rental on them, to restock the social housing and avoid the huge social costs of having thousands evicted. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|