Space Shuttles

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Space Shuttles

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Space Shuttles

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:15:56 PM

GreedyTop

Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline

Personally, I would hate to see this happen

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/09/09/nasa-space-station.html

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

Post #: 1

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:20:12 PM

scifi1133

Posts: 8529
Joined: 3/27/2007
From: virginia
Status: offline

That is just damned pathetic and so typical of this country. Don't worry about science or exploration. Just make more bombs. What a bunch of assholes.
The fact that we may have sunk that much money into a station we can't even get to....laughable to say the least.

_____________________________

I'm the happy fascist slut.
awwwwwww yeeeeeeeeah
And I see your schwartz is as big as mine.
My heart 10-01-72 / 10-16-09

(in reply to GreedyTop)

Post #: 2

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:43:05 PM

sappatoti

Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline

I'm not sure if Hale is short-changing the personnel who currently work on the shuttles. While he may claim that it's too late for the shuttle parts (particularly the engines) to be brought back up to capacity, if given the choice between lay-off or working overtime, I'm sure the personnel would choose the latter.

Once the construction of the station is complete, we wouldn't need to be scheduling four to five shuttle flights per year. Two scheduled flights, with the third orbiter to be used on standby/backup, would be plenty for the purpose of moving people and supplies up to the station. Thus, we wouldn't have to build as many engines or whatever other parts that have already been scaled down.

To not extend the shuttle program, at this point, would mean the expense of the station was a waste. Not only in financial terms, but in terms of the investment of people who worked so hard to make it a reality, including the seven astronauts who died in 2003.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to scifi1133)

Post #: 3

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:47:14 PM

scifi1133

Posts: 8529
Joined: 3/27/2007
From: virginia
Status: offline

I agree Sap. Unfortunately most feel that since they get nothing tangible out of the space program that its not important. The shuttles can of course be used past the life they gave them, and yes they can extend the life of them with some new parts. Im concerned that they just don't care enough to do so.

_____________________________

I'm the happy fascist slut.
awwwwwww yeeeeeeeeah
And I see your schwartz is as big as mine.
My heart 10-01-72 / 10-16-09

(in reply to sappatoti)

Post #: 4

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:52:58 PM

Vendaval

Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline

I do hope that funding and politics can be worked out for the space program.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE

http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to scifi1133)

Post #: 5

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:53:34 PM

Masternslave07

Posts: 203
Joined: 12/29/2006
Status: offline

I think that the shuttles were too complicated and too fragile to keep using. To lose one because of a tile coming loose seems pretty ridiculous. Hopefully the new ships will be simpler and stronger. It is a drag that there will be no flights until 2015, but I guess the moon isn't going anywhere, so we will get there when we get there.

_____________________________

You can lead a horse to water, but not a cow.

(in reply to GreedyTop)

Post #: 6

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:56:18 PM

sappatoti

Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline

It isn't just about going to the moon. It's also about getting people and supplies to the space station in orbit. Without the shuttles being extended, there won't be any crews from the US and its partners going up to the station. It will be manned by Russia and its partners, because they'll be the only country to have useable ships to get there.

Given the current state of mistrust between Russia and the US, I don't think it's wise to leave an outpost, built mostly with US money, in the hands of Russians.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to Masternslave07)

Post #: 7

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:58:45 PM

Masternslave07

Posts: 203
Joined: 12/29/2006
Status: offline

Yeah, it does seem like some screwed up scheduling.

_____________________________

You can lead a horse to water, but not a cow.

(in reply to sappatoti)

Post #: 8

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 10:59:21 PM

cyberdude611

Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline

Yeah the shuttles are too old to keep going. And the Constellation program wont begin until 2015. So there is going to be a gap.

(in reply to sappatoti)

Post #: 9

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 11:02:21 PM

TheHeretic

Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

Pretty much old news, I'm afraid. Folks in my neck of the woods are working on getting one to put in a museum. We built them here, and out running some errands this afternoon, I made a left from Columbia, onto Challenger. I think we have a good shot. "Spending all that money on a space station we can't get to" is utter nonsense. We go back to a single-use system.

The shuttle was a compromise to begin with, and has never lived up to expectations. It is time to let it go. The next generation will come, probably taking a very different approach to reaching orbit.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Spaceship_One_and_White_Knight_in_flight_1.jpg

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.

(in reply to GreedyTop)

Post #: 10

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 11:10:45 PM

sappatoti

Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline

NASA could always commission a couple of flights from Branson's Virgin Spaceways (or whatever he's calling it) to run replacement people to the station. Figure out some way to dock the shuttlecock to the station (if it already hasn't been arranged to do so at this point).

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to TheHeretic)

Post #: 11

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 11:31:21 PM

TheHeretic

Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

Virgin Galactic. And there is no need for that. The system was developed by Burt Rutan of Scaled Composites (the same guy who built the plane that went around the world on one tank of gas in the '80's), and that company was recently aquired by one of the major players in military aircraft. Just adapt the elements into something a whole lot more powerful.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.

(in reply to sappatoti)

Post #: 12

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/9/2008 11:40:25 PM

sappatoti

Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline

I was just thinking of expediency. According to their web site, Virgin Galactic states they could begin flights in 2009 which, if true, would allow for an almost seamless way of keeping space station personnel rotated without a break in their schedule.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to TheHeretic)

Post #: 13

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 5:03:34 AM

TheHeretic

Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

Read a little closer, Sappa. The system is sub-orbital. In simple terms, the elevator doesn't go high enough.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.

(in reply to sappatoti)

Post #: 14

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 5:17:32 AM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

For anyone who doesn't keep a close eye on NASA this is probably pretty surprising however it is the culmination of what has been going on at NASA for decades.

In simplest terms NASA is divided into two camps. One supports manned spaceflight and the other favors strictly unmanned spaceflight.Since about the mid 1970's the unmanned group has been dominant inside NASA and has made every effort to kill the manned program. They killed off the Hubble telescope because a manned flight was required to do a maintenance flight to it. It's fairly obvious that if the new system won't be ready till 2015 that some stepps have to be taken to either get a new shuttle or do a full rebuild of one or more existing shuttles, on one of the retired shuttles perhaps, but instead they built a plan around using Soyuz to reach the ISS and to functionally kick the manned program out of NASA entirely. Now that has backfired and NASA top administrators aren't trying all that hard to find another alternative.

(in reply to TheHeretic)

Post #: 15

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 5:21:42 AM

kittinSol

Posts: 16926
Status: offline

I bloody well hope they dismantle the thing and recycle the bits. There's enough rubbish circulating around the Earth already

.

_____________________________

(in reply to DomKen)

Post #: 16

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 10:27:09 AM

sappatoti

Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Read a little closer, Sappa. The system is sub-orbital. In simple terms, the elevator doesn't go high enough.

[... sigh ...]

Yeah, I saw that. Even if it were as simple as adding extra boosters to the shuttle-cock to raise its altitude, there are a whole host of other issues that would need to be modified:

- increasing oxygen supplies for the much longer voyage necessary to catch the space station, or installation of atmospheric recyclers

- adding beefed up heating/cooling to maintain a comfortable temperature within the cockpit

- adding toilet facilities

- adding and supplying food processing and waste containment

- adding orbital maneuvering thrusters and associated supplies and hardware

- adding in-flight entertainment ... wait, it's a Branson initiative so I'm sure they're already in there

- and possibly adding extra radiation shielding

and that's the minimum that I came up with.

Better to build a new craft built on the shuttle-cock principle, or refit one of the existing shuttles to extend its life.

Maybe China's capsules are ready to fly... hmm...

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to TheHeretic)

Post #: 17

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 10:29:22 AM

sappatoti

Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I bloody well hope they dismantle the thing and recycle the bits. There's enough rubbish circulating around the Earth already .

That would require a fleet of vehicles around the size of the existing shuttles to bring everything back down. The financial cost would be as much, perhaps more, as it was to put the thing up there.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to kittinSol)

Post #: 18

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 10:34:28 AM

Aylee

Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

Are you crazy? Just look at all the medical advances because of the Space Program. And I thought that we had an aging population. Sheesh!

quote:

ORIGINAL: scifi1133

I agree Sap. Unfortunately most feel that since they get nothing tangible out of the space program that its not important. The shuttles can of course be used past the life they gave them, and yes they can extend the life of them with some new parts. Im concerned that they just don't care enough to do so.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to scifi1133)

Post #: 19

RE: Space Shuttles - 9/10/2008 11:04:17 AM

thishereboi

Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

Your right, that would totally suck.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert

This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi

(in reply to GreedyTop)

Post #: 20

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Space Shuttles

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.172