|
shallowdeep -> RE: Google Launches New Web Browser "CHROME" (9/4/2008 3:30:09 AM)
|
Some links: Google's Chrome Site Google's comic book introducing Chrome I've played around with it a bit and generally like it. It been stable and fast for me so far - although there are already a couple of discovered exploits. The underlying architecture tying tabs to separate processes may make using web applications more reliable, plus the task manager it enables is rather neat. That said, I don't see any really compelling reason to switch from my current browser, even if Chrome was currently available for my platform of choice. Some other first impressions: Ars Technica: Hands on With Chrome: Google's browser shines (mostly) CNET Review of Chrome quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen We already have to test against IE, IE for Mac, Firefox, Opera, Konqueror, Epiphany and Safari. People still use IE for Mac? Really? That's a scary thought... Since Chrome - like Safari and future Epiphany versions - uses WebKit, the additional compatibility issues it brings will hopefully be at least somewhat limited. quote:
ORIGINAL: outlier I agree with this thought. I also don't know if I trust the "no history" feature they are pushing. Because one of the things that my "NO Script" Firefox extension blocks most often is "google analytics", trying to collect information. I wouldn't worry much about Incognito mode being secretly nefarious, or conflate it with Google Analytics. While a privacy mode is no longer particularly differentiating (Firefox extensions, Safari, and IE 8 already offer similar features), it is a nice feature. The open source nature of the Chrome project should help reassure even the paranoid that it works as intended. Google Analytics is a separate issue, it's something website operators can add to their sites to collect data about usage patterns. It uses some cookies to keep track of how frequently you visit a site, for how long, and how you got there. This information is arguably a bit more invasive than typical server logs, but it isn't more personally identifying than the IP address you leave on logs regardless of whether cookies are used or not - unless you've resorted to something like anonymizing proxies, perhaps. Incognito mode does block access to existing cookies and deletes any cookies set during the private session, so it handles this sort of thing reasonably well too. Some legitimate privacy concerns have been raised about the way the combined address/search bar sends data to facilitate completion suggestions under the default settings and when not in Incognito mode, but it's pretty easy to turn off if you are concerned. Some more information: Google's Official Privacy Policy for Chrome EFF: We're concerned about Google's Omnibox Google's Omnibox could be Pandora's box
|
|
|
|