Pyrrsefanie
Posts: 1222
Joined: 9/18/2007 From: NEW HAMPSHAAAAAAH! Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Alumbrado Adding up everything, seems very likely that something fishy is going on. But a DNA match of a stain in a parent's car isn't exactly damning proof, just another circumstance that can be viewed as suspicious or explained away as benign. See, but even that depends on the location and the size of the stain. If it's a little stain in the backseat, well -- could have been an upset tummy or a sneeze or something like that, lord knows I puked in my mom's car enough when I was little! But if it's a sizeable stain in the trunk area and the little girl has no medical history of being carted off to the emergency room for a serious accidental wound or something like that... I'd start to ask questions. Of course come to think of it they're referring to it as just "DNA" and not simply blood, which an easy luminol and/or swab test would be able to confirm, so either they're withholding details until the investigation gets a little further, or it's some substance other than blood... which is where it gets interesting to play "What's That Stain?!" Edit to add: And the 30-day wait was what convinced me the mother had a hand in it, DNA be damned, I didn't even make it that far into the article on first read. I can't speak for the grandmother, but seriously... I don't see how someone with a clean conscience could wait 30 days to report any child missing, let alone their own flesh and blood.
< Message edited by Pyrrsefanie -- 8/21/2008 7:11:46 AM >
_____________________________
Ти саркастична, це – доля, Ти артистична в неволі, Ти симпатична в цій ролі, Ти синтетична до болю Read my series, Taking Jessica, on http://www.akashaweb.com !
|