Owner4SexSlave
Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Redbaron1979 Personally i think he was harshly treated. I mean he was only doing it for the Craic. In any case he was in the sub role as well. Love to know what skeltons are in the closets of the lads at the News of the World They are making a big deal out his family's past political history as well. Who the hell can be held responsible for what their Grandparents or parents did? He's not the only person with a family tree connected to a Questionable past. It's rather crazy how people blow things out of proportion at times. As you said, would love to know what Skeltons are in the Closets of the lads at the News of the World. Wonder how many people involved in the News industry have parents or grand parents that had a checkered past as well. But then again, are they really that important to draw News Attention? I actually love the fact that Max is taking the high ground and confronting the moral opposition with the truth of his BDSM activities. The German Sexual sub-culture before, during and after WWII, well franky involved people doing some extremely kinky things to one another. It should not be suprising that some people scene or act things that involve Kinky Twisted Nazi's on a sex power control trip. So somebody wants to play out being used and abused by some German Nazi Girls. IT's all a Scene! Crap, I wonder how many actors should be damned for playing Nazi Roles in the making of Hollywood movies? Dugh!! I wish people would understand that's it's role playing, on par with acting. This is just anti-semantic overkill here. This reminds me of it being more correct to to wish somebody "Happy Holidays" and avoid saying "Merry Christmas" because somebody might get a big stick up their ass and become offended by it. Anymore you have to watch how you express GOOD will towards another human being. Even though my intentions of good will should be understood without question. It's not like I'm saying "Merry Christmas" to intentionally offend or trample on somebody's beliefs. Can't anybody have any personal preferences anymore? Personally, I think attacking people for how they use their own personal freedom and forbidding it, is a form of fascism. It's amazing the amount of people that are selling the civil liberties/rights of other people because they simply don't agree with it, even though it's something that is not causing anybody any true/real harm. Does this mean I can sue somebody just because they way they looked at me offended me? Geeesh....
|