RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


meatcleaver -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/5/2008 1:31:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Stalin Industrialized the USSR and won WWII.


Won WWII???

How would he have done without Lend Lease?



The Soviets ripped the guts out of the German army, without that D-Day would have been very questionable and if possible, the death rates on the western front would have been far far higher, probably similar to WWI when the Brits and the French had to rip the guts out of the German army.

Lend lease was necessary but hey, better than spilling American blood. Yes?




slaveboyforyou -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/5/2008 5:03:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou


I wouldn't call our fears about the Soviet Union overestimations.  Whether you want to accept it or not, the Soviets were actively trying to exert their influence all over the world.  It's pretty easy to see that when you notice what kind of rifles people in poor, war torn countries are carrying.  Why do you think the Soviets were giving away Kalashnikovs like they were candy?  We weren't being paranoid at all. 



Just about every aggressive initial move was made by the USA (the other western powers being impotent in influencing US policy).

Don't mention Cuba, Russia wanting to place missiles in Cuba was a response to the USA placing missiles in Turkey.

As we get furtyher from the cold war and more documents are released by European countries it is becoming increasingly obvious, most European countries thought the USSR didn't have the capacity to invade western Europe and thought the USSR was merely taking a defensive position. It was the USA that was in an ideological mindset, not NATO. France, Spain weren't worried, Dutch soldiers had weekends off to go home. The British would sell their country to have the US fuck them but even there as more official papers are released from the Cold War, they too didn't believe the USSR would make an aggressive move in Europe. Most Europeans were more fearful of the USA taking aggressive action, not the Russians. Supposedly being US allies didn't make many Europeans feel any better because the war was going to be fought here and considered the US as quite happy to have Europe obliterated for their ideological reasons. You will get rightwing Europeans that will give the opposite view but then, the rightwing wanted American ideological capitalism.


Yeah, that's why they all joined NATO and allowed U.S. military bases in their countries.  You can try all of this "America is evil" revisionist history all you want Meatcleaver.  We came out of the Cold War triumphant, and the Soviets lost.  The Soviets tried their hardest to keep it together.  They ruthlessly invaded Czechoslovakia, put down the Polish solidarity movement, invaded Afghanistan, and aided movements all over the world.  But they lost, and we made it happen. 





meatcleaver -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/5/2008 11:15:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou


Yeah, that's why they all joined NATO and allowed U.S. military bases in their countries.  You can try all of this "America is evil" revisionist history all you want Meatcleaver.  We came out of the Cold War triumphant, and the Soviets lost.  The Soviets tried their hardest to keep it together.  They ruthlessly invaded Czechoslovakia, put down the Polish solidarity movement, invaded Afghanistan, and aided movements all over the world.  But they lost, and we made it happen. 



Actually, I think the US occupied Germany along with the Soviets. Britain and France got sectors for political reasons. Atlee, the British Prime Minister in 1945 was powerless and fell into line with the US. Hey, he had to choose one side or the other, he thought the US was the best of the two. The US refused to withdraw from Germany in the same way the Soviets refused to withdraw from Germany so what's the difference?

The Soviets ruthlessly invaded Czechoslavakia, you mean like the US ruthlessly invaded Vietnam? The US put missiles in Turkey aimed at Moscow but that isn't aggressive but the Soviets wanting to put missiles in Cuba aimed at the American mainland in response is aggressive? The US aided geurilla groups all over the world too, over threw deomocratic governments in Iran and Chile. What is the difference? The Soviets had their ideology and the US had its ideology and millions died because of both, what is the difference? Far less people died in Czechoslovakia and Hungary at the hands of the Soviets than people died at the hands of the Americans in Vietnam, Loas and Cambodia. (Sorry, they don't count because they're not white.)

Gorbachov was a realist and decided he couldn't hold back change and it was in Russia's interest to go with the times. The rise of the European Economic Community also meant that the US couldn't act independently in Europe anymore. The fact remains, the Russian economy collapsed because Yeltsin stupidly took advice from rightwing American economists.

The arms race took its toll on the Soviets but Reagan had as much to do with its fall as the Pope, Margerat Thatcher and a whole bunch of others who claim to have been responsible for its fall. The fall of the USSR was inbuilt into its constitution and would have fallen eventually anyway. You only have to read the rightwing American commentator PJ O'Rourke for that analysis and he said that in the early 70s.

Oh, and lets not forget America's invasion of Iraq with lapdog Britain in tow. A mirror is always a good thing when it comes to foreign affairs. Just because Americans feel free in America doesn't mean the American government is so benevolent to people of other countries, it ain't.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/5/2008 11:28:30 AM)

The name of "reform" simply covers what is latently a process of the theft of the national heritage.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn




cloudboy -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/5/2008 11:57:00 AM)


What do you mean here, I don't get it.




Moloch -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/5/2008 2:18:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


What do you mean here, I don't get it.


St. PeterBurgs Mayor threw a wedding for his dauter...
Huge lavish party, the used Peter The Great's  silverware and dishes, national treasure and heritage  half of them went missing. That doesnt even scratch the surface of these new Russian officials whoring, pimping and disgracing Russian heritage.




candystripper -> RE: Alexander Solzhenitsyn dies at 89 (8/6/2008 4:11:17 PM)

He was a brilliant writer too Level.  This is terrible news.
 
candystripper




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125