RE: Erototoxins (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


IronBear -> RE: Erototoxins (11/16/2005 6:13:47 PM)

Isn't a Might moouse a moose which may or may not not do what all good moouses do?????????




WickedKev -> RE: Erototoxins (11/16/2005 6:56:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Remzod

"Thanks to the latest advances in neuroscience, we now know that pornographic visual images imprint and alter the brain, triggering an instant, involuntary, but lasting, biochemical memory trail, arguably, subverting the First Amendment by overriding the cognitive speech process. This is true of so-called “soft-core” and “hard-core” pornography. And once new neurochemical pathways are established they are difficult or impossible to delete. "

"Pornography psychopharmacologically imprints young brains – thereby invalidating notions of informed consent."

http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1343&wit_id=3910


I find it scary that when governments want to justify the reasons for taking away peoples rights and freedoms and they can't get a legitimate impartial source to back up thier case, they call upon any right wing crackpot and pass them off as an impartial authority on the subject.




IronBear -> RE: Erototoxins (11/16/2005 10:41:29 PM)

Yeah Kev, but look at the pathetic excuses they used to ban the "Tom & jerry" cartoons and make "Noddy" a bad story fill with nasty sexual deviations and raceism.......... I bet the same people loves to break the toys of others when they were kids. Just wait for them to make sex illegal because some Government bod cant get a bit, or some nubile staffer wont open her legs.




michaelMI -> RE: Erototoxins (11/16/2005 11:04:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Remzod

"Thanks to the latest advances in neuroscience, we now know that pornographic visual images imprint and alter the brain, triggering an instant, involuntary, but lasting, biochemical memory trail, arguably, subverting the First Amendment by overriding the cognitive speech process. This is true of so-called “soft-core” and “hard-core” pornography. And once new neurochemical pathways are established they are difficult or impossible to delete. "

"Pornography psychopharmacologically imprints young brains – thereby invalidating notions of informed consent."

http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1343&wit_id=3910


isn't it strange that, upon posting this "information" that this person's profile does not exist? at least that's what it said when i tried to pull it up. is anyone else able to see this person's profile?




michaelMI -> RE: Erototoxins (11/16/2005 11:13:22 PM)

no WONDER millions of people suffer from depression...LOL




candystripper -> RE: Erototoxins (11/17/2005 12:03:25 AM)

quote:

Isn't a Might moouse a moose which may or may not not do what all good moouses do?????????

IronBear


Mighty Mouse is a very buff superhero with a tight outfit that shows off his gorgeous bod; pearl is his girlffriend and a bit of a ninny. She requires rescuing alot.

There's a moose on "Rocky and Bullwinkle"; i did not lust after the moose, LOL.

http://www.everwonder.com/david/bullwinkle/

candystripper




Prunesquallor -> RE: Erototoxins (11/17/2005 2:48:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelMI

isn't it strange that, upon posting this "information" that this person's profile does not exist? at least that's what it said when i tried to pull it up.


I don't think it strange at all; it is exactly what I would expect.




WickedKev -> RE: Erototoxins (11/17/2005 5:26:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

Yeah Kev, but look at the pathetic excuses they used to ban the "Tom & jerry" cartoons and make "Noddy" a bad story fill with nasty sexual deviations and raceism.......... I bet the same people loves to break the toys of others when they were kids. Just wait for them to make sex illegal because some Government bod cant get a bit, or some nubile staffer wont open her legs.


Just posted on another forum. The thread was talking about how the UK is becoming more and more a police state. They are now talking about introducing a chip to put in your car so they can monitor where you go, where you been, how long it took you, your route and your stops. The police are saying the government plans on charging us on how much we use the roads. That is a load of BS, they already do that and the more you use them the more you pay. The method they use is charging 90p tax for every pound you spend on petrol. They also want to ban the term Christmas, as it offends non christians, well I'm a non christian an no one asked me if it offends me. And of course the new internet porn laws, these cut right into the fabric of my life. This new law if passed just about makes BDSM illegal, it even says that a sub/or slave dosn't know thier own mind when it comes to consenual play. So they are going to make it up for them Scary times, they are trying to change the way people think and our succeeding. The best news to date is Tony Blair getting defeated on the anti terrorism bill. He wants to lock suspected terrorists up for 90 days without charge or evidence. Problem being there is no official definition of a terrorist, so if you say 'I hate the government' you can be labled a terrorist and thrown into prison. George Orwell only got the date wrong me thinks.




jamesthehumanrug -> RE: Erototoxins (11/20/2005 11:39:10 AM)

GREETINGS REM/ZOO
FRANKLY: my dear
you still can't sepparate which comes first:the phisiological-reaction ,or language ,so -go figure!?-
what dummy is splitting hairs,for what hidden agenda?....




jamesthehumanrug -> RE: Erototoxins (11/20/2005 11:47:23 AM)

dear REM
ZOO
GREETINGS,
you still can't differentiate which came first; the physiological-reaction ,or the simutaneous ,or premier language development(pictorial, or verbal language dev.wh/is ,also a neuro- pathway,found ,in ,infants)....,
and,furthermore:,
w/scientologist (see:, also ;psychobiology;*,harris,),possible language, and, it's neuro- pathways are developed , before birth ,and,in the womb!.
,so :....
who's splitting hairs,for what hidden-agenda?
* harris, boston university(prof.psycho-biology) playboy stole the article ,and ,misquoted his discovery,
on phermones, in humans(ie:exotolide,a derivative, of mens' urine ;found, as common ,ingrediants ,in all perfumes.)




theRose4U -> RE: Erototoxins (11/20/2005 3:14:53 PM)

quote:

If aprehended by the local law (who really want to admire your leather gear and droll over your new handcuffs because they are better that the police issue, you simply inform them that pornographic visual images imprint and alter the brain, triggering an instant, involuntary, but lasting, biochemical memory trail, arguably, subverting the First Amendment by overriding the cognitive speech process.


But how does this affect the Fifth Amendment...meaning the right to come on here and not admit to lurking and yet make a life of reading porn. ROFLMAO. HE HE Saw you at church on Sunday...don't we know you from somewhere else?




MeryKitsune -> RE: Erototoxins (11/20/2005 4:16:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Remzod

"Thanks to the latest advances in neuroscience, we now know that pornographic visual images imprint and alter the brain, triggering an instant, involuntary, but lasting, biochemical memory trail, arguably, subverting the First Amendment by overriding the cognitive speech process. This is true of so-called “soft-core” and “hard-core” pornography. And once new neurochemical pathways are established they are difficult or impossible to delete. "

"Pornography psychopharmacologically imprints young brains – thereby invalidating notions of informed consent."

http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1343&wit_id=3910


So does Barney the Purple Dinosaur. Or the Smurfs. Or a picture of Jesus.

BAN THEM ALL!!!!!!!!!!!![8|]


EVERYTHING you see causes a neurochemical change in your brain. It's the way we learn. It's having the pathways reinforced that causes long-term learning. That's neuroscience 101.


And where the [bleep] did free will go?




beneathfeet -> RE: Erototoxins (11/23/2005 11:38:54 PM)

OhhRah




Vendaval -> RE: Erototoxins (11/24/2005 12:50:24 AM)

E gads! See the quote below for more of the faulty reasoning! Certainly all of the rapists, pedophiles, etc ate fast-food, watched TV, listened to the radio, and liked to wank their willy. Hell, maybe they became rapists and pedophiles after eating all the toxins in fast food!

"Testimony from victims and police commonly finds pornography an on site sex crime manual. In one 1984 Senate hearing, John Rabun, now COO of DoJ’s Missing and Abducted Children Center, testified that when arrested, “all, that is 100%” of rapists, pedophiles, etc., in their study possessed adult pornography, “such as Playboy, on up….” "





Vendaval -> RE: Erototoxins (11/24/2005 12:54:41 AM)

Nah, I became a true degenerate after years of watching "Scobby Doo"! Those two girls having the lesbian affair, the flamboyant gay guy with the tight sweater and the trendy scarf, and that shagadelic-psychadelic-porno-van! But hey, nothing turns a kid onto drugs like watching cartoon characters get all paranoid when they don't get their "Scooby Snacks"!




Vendaval -> RE: Erototoxins (11/24/2005 12:59:51 AM)

I just have to add this one. During the height of the Religious Right screaming about the supposedly homo-evil influence of the Teletubbies I walked into one of the leather shops in San Francisco. Inside of a display cage with thick bars to hold the manly-men there was the cute little purple Teletubby, with his purple triangle on his head. And round his tiny waist the store staff had placed a strap-on and a dildoe! It totally made my day. [:D]




pandoravampire -> RE: Erototoxins (11/24/2005 3:09:47 AM)

Remzod,
today ive had a bad day, so thought id indulge in some venting of the spleen in the direction of your ridiculous post.
ive never read such a load of drivell in my entire life.
the only thing i can equate to it, is a critique of a research article i had to make once, the article looked as credible as your post, until that is, you read it.
Cor blimey love, surely its too early for xmas cracker philosophy!

Pandoravampire, this post was one box i didnt need to look into thats for sure
quote:

ORIGINAL: Remzod

"Thanks to the latest advances in neuroscience, we now know that pornographic visual images imprint and alter the brain, triggering an instant, involuntary, but lasting, biochemical memory trail, arguably, subverting the First Amendment by overriding the cognitive speech process. This is true of so-called “soft-core” and “hard-core” pornography. And once new neurochemical pathways are established they are difficult or impossible to delete. "

"Pornography psychopharmacologically imprints young brains – thereby invalidating notions of informed consent."

http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/testimony.cfm?id=1343&wit_id=3910





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125