|
cailinbeag -> RE: question (6/29/2008 7:03:11 AM)
|
Within the context of my relationship with Daddy, I have no limits. There's no need for them. We communicate. We trust. We're also equally sick and adventerous. For me to stand up and define limits would be like my saying "I will not eat brussel sprouts" to a man who hates brussel sprouts and will never demand them for dinner. It's kind of a non-issue. Now if I were to play casually, then yes. I have limits. No fluid exchange, for example. If there's something I think my play partner might want to do that I will not do, then I need to speak up so that no assumptions are made. By the same token though, to make not giving me third degree burns with a butane torch a limit is to infer that this was in the realm of possible play and obviously I haven't made a suitable choice in play partners. I think people take the word "limits" too literally, and I don't understand why people come down so hard on those who claim to have none. When I hear "no limits", all I think is that the person doesn't have any recognized triggers, either emotionally or physically, isn't afraid to try new things and has enjoyed what they have already experienced. I hear comments here about "telling her to rob a bank" and I just roll my eyes. Yah, you made your point, but seriously. If I lined up a list of 100 people who were advocators of limits, and their lists of limits, I'd bet money that not a single one of them would have "I will not rob a bank" listed.
|
|
|
|