Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


knees2you -> Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 5:36:27 PM)

I know that Religion, and Circus folk should have nothing to do with Politics, but I've never known a Politician
(Circus performer) who did not Change their mind on People, Places or Things, during their running
for office.
 
(I think same sex marriages are wrong, wait I can get more votes if I acknolwedge them.)
 
Believe in what they will a Christian is never going to get elected into office.
 
No matter how Right he may be, it's just not going to happen. Just ask Mike Huckabee.
 
Say what you will, but "The Truth Hurts."
 
I've seen to many people deny God, yet it is everywhere
in oiur Constitution. Our country was founded on it.
 
http://ad2004.com/prophecytruths/Articles/Prophecy/Washington.html
 
only in the end will it truly be revealed.
 
Always, Ant[sm=yeahright.gif]





AquaticSub -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 5:45:56 PM)

Yanno... when I was Baptist I hated people who sprout this. I don't agree with it in the slightest. The country was founded in a culture where not going to church enough meant you were a witch and killed or you were stuck in jail. Not including those references would ensure failure of the nation because people wouldn't get behind it. People weren't ready to accept diversity and other religions as valid.

I guess some people still aren't. Shame.




lronitulstahp -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 5:58:20 PM)

i won't ridicule you here, because i know you truly believe what you say...but i will leave you with this:

1 Sam 16;7
But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart

Luke 6:37...............................................................................
Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:

Matt 7:3
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

The" founding fathers" were human beings struggling to amke sense out of life just as we all are.  We all know what a fine upright devout person Thomas Jefferson was[;)].   Seriously...don't put your faith in the acts and deeds of others, or you will be constantly disappointed...live your life to the best of your ability, and make your peace with G-d.  All the best to you.





atursvcMaam -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 6:02:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

Yanno... when I was Baptist I hated people who sprout this. I don't agree with it in the slightest. The country was founded in a culture where not going to church enough meant you were a witch and killed or you were stuck in jail. Not including those references would ensure failure of the nation because people wouldn't get behind it. People weren't ready to accept diversity and other religions as valid.

I guess some people still aren't. Shame.


i am sorry that you aren't/




AquaticSub -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 6:04:28 PM)

I accept many religions and support them. You will find me supporting the right of any student to pray in school while supporting their right not to pray. You'll have to get over the word hate - I don't actively hate the person, simply the sentiment.

What I do not support and openly loathe are attempts like this to turn our government and laws into a matter of religion.




atursvcMaam -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 6:39:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub

I accept many religions and support them. You will find me supporting the right of any student to pray in school while supporting their right not to pray. You'll have to get over the word hate - I don't actively hate the person, simply the sentiment.

What I do not support and openly loathe are attempts like this to turn our government and laws into a matter of religion.


Your choice is your choice. 
The religion that i tend to follow allows for free will.  There tend to be guidelines, but the choice is always yours, and any judgement happens at the end of life, or the end of time.  The government, when it works as it should, allows for the opportunity to voice one's opinion openly, and to select representatives that tend, and are supposed to reflect the views and sentiment of a majority of those that they represent.  It may seem slow, inefficient and archaic, but it seems to work.  There are occasional perversions of this system, and it often seems unfair to minority viewholders.  The best bet seems to be to get most people to agree with you.
   Sometimes i have to accept, on both fronts, that what happens, happens.  i don't leave room for hate, but i do have questions from tme to time.




Termyn8or -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 6:43:41 PM)

I seem to remember the word Creator being used. That doesn't seem to specify any religion.

T




AquaticSub -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 7:42:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: atursvcMaam

Your choice is your choice. 
The religion that i tend to follow allows for free will.  There tend to be guidelines, but the choice is always yours, and any judgement happens at the end of life, or the end of time.  The government, when it works as it should, allows for the opportunity to voice one's opinion openly, and to select representatives that tend, and are supposed to reflect the views and sentiment of a majority of those that they represent.  It may seem slow, inefficient and archaic, but it seems to work.  There are occasional perversions of this system, and it often seems unfair to minority viewholders.  The best bet seems to be to get most people to agree with you.
  Sometimes i have to accept, on both fronts, that what happens, happens.  i don't leave room for hate, but i do have questions from tme to time.


Sounds like a good boiled down version of what I got in government. In fact that supports the idea of changing public policy to suit the voters (ie. allowing homosexual marriage because it will get you more votes). My problem, again, is when people try to bring Jesus into the structure of government.

Believe what you will, I have no problem with that. I have problem with a faith, any faith - even my own, making the law of the land.




DomKen -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 9:36:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: knees2you

I know that Religion, and Circus folk should have nothing to do with Politics, but I've never known a Politician
(Circus performer) who did not Change their mind on People, Places or Things, during their running
for office.
 
(I think same sex marriages are wrong, wait I can get more votes if I acknolwedge them.)
 
Believe in what they will a Christian is never going to get elected into office.
 
No matter how Right he may be, it's just not going to happen. Just ask Mike Huckabee.
 
Say what you will, but "The Truth Hurts."
 
I've seen to many people deny God, yet it is everywhere
in oiur Constitution. Our country was founded on it.
 
http://ad2004.com/prophecytruths/Articles/Prophecy/Washington.html
 
only in the end will it truly be revealed.
 
Always, Ant[sm=yeahright.gif]



The word 'god' does not appear in the US Constitution so it isn't everywhere in the Constitution. The Founders very carefully and intentionally seperated church and state.

Many very devout people have been elected President, Jimmy Carter is the most recent example.




Zensee -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 10:28:53 PM)

An avowed atheist could not inhabit the Whitehouse but it seems the majority of Prezzies in my memory were overt and practicing christians.

Could someone with a better knowledge of your presidents than this Canadian, put a number on how many were publicly avowed Christians?



Z.




knees2you -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 10:40:22 PM)

quote:

Yanno... when I was Baptist I hated people who sprout this. I don't agree with it in the slightest. The country was founded in a culture where not going to church enough meant you were a witch and killed or you were stuck in jail. Not including those references would ensure failure of the nation because people wouldn't get behind it. People weren't ready to accept diversity and other religions as valid.

I guess some people still aren't. Shame.

 
quote:

Show me something (religion with a Beginning and an End?)

Always, Ant[:)]




DomKen -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 10:46:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zensee

An avowed atheist could not inhabit the Whitehouse but it seems the majority of Prezzies in my memory were overt and practicing christians.

Could someone with a better knowledge of your presidents than this Canadian, put a number on how many were publicly avowed Christians?



Z.


To some degree or another all US President shave been publicly avowed christians. During Thomas Jefferson's campaign for the presidency he was accused of being apostate, functionally meaning he was an atheist. He rather forcefully argued against that claim and no one sense has gotten close without being, at least publicly, a christian. Nixon was a Quaker for instance.




Zensee -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/25/2008 10:55:43 PM)

Thanks, DK. Pretty much as I heard it then.

So, OP - "a christian is never going to get elected into office.."

Why would Americans stop doing that all of a sudden?



Z.




thornhappy -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/26/2008 5:15:35 PM)

It depends on the definition of "Christian".  Some believe the only real Christrians are [inerrant] Bible-believing fundamentalist Christians, and regard folks like Lutherans, Methodists, etc. as lukewarm and probably doomed, and may even regard the Pope as the Antichrist.

[opinions expressed above are from personal experiences and research]

thornhappy




ToysAndTies -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/26/2008 6:24:21 PM)

I'd say quite the opposite, OP.  It's far more difficult for a nonreligious person to be embraced in the public eye, because inherently, if someone goes to mass, he obviously has moral fiber that athiests lack.  How much conversation has been over the various candidates' religious persuasions?  Once, I would like to see a candidate get up and say, "actually, I haven't been to mass since I was dragged there at the age of five and frankly, I don't want to go back any time soon."  




DarkVictory -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/26/2008 6:42:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

I seem to remember the word Creator being used. That doesn't seem to specify any religion.

T


In fact, if you read much about the 'Founding Fathers' and their culture, they were at most Thiests (generic believers in some higher power), and often agnostic to darned near athiest.  Thomas Jefferson as president once wrote in the treaty of Tripoli. "Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion"

edited to add a couple of comments I dropped off.

The US was created as a nation in which Christians, of all kinds, as well as others were welcome to practice their religion, any religion, or no religion as they saw fit.  This was in purposeful contrast to english and european history.  What's happened in the intervening 200 plus years is that the christian right has tried to turn the freedom of religion into a christian ethic in support of their flesh eating zombie worship.




candystripper -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/26/2008 7:09:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: knees2you

I know that Religion, and Circus folk should have nothing to do with Politics, but I've never known a Politician
(Circus performer) who did not Change their mind on People, Places or Things, during their running
for office.
 
(I think same sex marriages are wrong, wait I can get more votes if I acknolwedge them.)
 
Believe in what they will a Christian is never going to get elected into office.
 
No matter how Right he may be, it's just not going to happen. Just ask Mike Huckabee.
 
Say what you will, but "The Truth Hurts."
 
I've seen to many people deny God, yet it is everywhere
in oiur Constitution. Our country was founded on it.
 
http://ad2004.com/prophecytruths/Articles/Prophecy/Washington.html
 
only in the end will it truly be revealed.
 
Always, Ant[sm=yeahright.gif]




Ant, there's serious doubt as to the credibility of the reporters and sources involved in the story you linked us to:
 
quote:

Are there any reliable facts in "Washington's Vision"? A man named Anthony Sherman did serve in the Continental Army. He applied for and received a pension in the 1830s. However, his pension application said he wasn't at Valley Forge in the winter of 1777-78; he was
with Gen. Benedict Arnold's army instead. Furthermore, Anthony Sherman is not listed among Revolutionary veterans receiving a pension in 1840, meaning he had died by that year—well over a decade before he supposedly spoke to Wesley Bradshaw in Philadelphia.

Wesley Bradshaw didn't exist, either. That was a pseudonym used by Charles W. (for Wesley) Alexander, the publisher of "Washington's Vision". John Adcock at
Yesterday's Papers says that Alexander, using his "Wesley Bradshaw" identity, had already contributed to a series of illustrated pamphlets that 'purported to be true stories of murderers and female fiends, full of torture, murder and melerdrama, usually beginning on page 19, so a 64 page work was not all it was advertised to be.'

(Note that Washington's Vision gets rolling on page 11.) Thus, if we believe the story Alexander tells in "Washington's Vision," he heard of an angelic prophecy crucial to the nation, and chose to publish it under the same pseudonym he used for exploitative potboilers.

In fact, a big part of Alexander's work was responding to recent public events with patriotic thrillers and legends. During and after the Civil War he wrote and published several novels such as Pauline of the Potomac; Or, General McClellan's Spy; its sequel Maud of the Mississippi, General Grant's Daring Spy; and the immortal The Angel of the Battlefield: A Tale of the Rebellion. In 1876, just in time for the Centennial celebration, Alexander came out with
The History and Legends of the Old Liberty Bell in Independence Hall in Philadelphia. "Washington's Vision" is part of that fictional output, not a historic link to Valley Forge.

Nonetheless, "Washington's Vision" has been reprinted many times since 1861, including in the Grand Army of the Republic's newspaper, the National Tribune, in 1880, and its successor Stars and Stripes in 1950. And now it's on the internet, so it will never die
.


http://boston1775.blogspot.com/2006/12/truth-of-washingtons-vision.html
 
The author of the article I quoted in part, above, is J.L. Bell, whose published works appear in scholary magazines.  A list of his published works can be found here:
 
http://boston1775.blogspot.com/2006/05/j-l-bells-publications.html
 
Most scholars agree that it was the Intent of the Founders to provide for a separation of church and state.
 
quote:

Eschewing
both notions of a "Christian America" and an aggressive secularism, the author concludes that original intent warrants a "loose separation" and "benevolent neutrality" (WALZ v. TAX COMMISSION 1970) that, while respecting certain forms of accommodation, generally requires complete separation between government and religion
.

 
Religion and the Continental Congress, 1774-1789: Contributions to Original Intent, by Derek H. Davis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. 309 pp. Cloth $39.95.
 
Your factoid that 'a Christian is never going to get elected into office' doesn't hold water either.  U.S. Presidents have overwhelming been 'WASPs' -- one was Catholic, another was a Jehovah's Witness, and the rest belonged to various mainstream protestant churches.  We have yet to elect a non-Christian as President.
 
http://www.adherents.com/adh_presidents.html

Beware of the 'net when researching factoids, Ant; look into the bona fides of the author and the publication.
 
The link you posted, and the story it contains, seem to be no more than folklore, lacking a factual historical basis.
 
By the way, what did 'circus folk' have to do with the Op?
 
Best wishes,
 
candystripper
 





knees2you -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/26/2008 10:46:52 PM)

quote:

I seem to remember the word Creator being used. That doesn't seem to specify any religion.
T

 
How many Creators do you think we have?
 
besides the 10 Commandments where there along with Moses. Gotcha
 
quote:

"Always right when turning left."

 
Always, Ant[sm=applause.gif]




DomKen -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/26/2008 10:54:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: knees2you
How many Creators do you think we have?

Somewhere between zero and thousands. It's really a matter of which if any story you believe.

Specifically in the case of the US Constitution the deists who wrote it did not mean the judeo-christian deity in any sort of recognizable form.




knees2you -> RE: Politics, Religion, Circus Folk. (6/27/2008 10:48:32 PM)

Yes I Believe in being head of my Household.
 
I also believe that yes God created all this.
 
If I'm wrong in my Beliefs, then I have Nothing to lose.
 
but if I'm right, then the ones who where wrong really lose.
 
But Politics and religion are very funny.
 
Always, Ant[sm=offtopic2.gif]




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875