Emperor1956
Posts: 2370
Joined: 11/7/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
cjan: Evility, Buddhists tend not to judge other reiligious practices as "strange" or to label them. Perhaps, you could take a spiritual lesson from their point of view. Btw, the "practice " that they refer to in the article and label as "Buddist", is not the circumstance of living in such close proximity. The practice is to watch the mind and it's reactions to "unpleasant" phenomena. Just as watching the mind and it's reactions to "pleasant" phenomena can be a spiritual practice. It's not easy, but can take one a long way in becoming less reactive and, therefore, less likely to be swept away by circumstances. Thank you. both for attempting to educate one and many. There is nothing at all "Buddist" about the actions the original couple take, it is the conciousness and sharing of the partner's concious that is the Buddist part. But, cjan (and anyone else who wants to chime in) did you find a dichotomy in what these Buddist teachers are doing? In Buddism, one of the understandings needed to attain nirvana and a key philosophical concept is anatta, the concept of "non-self" or the rejection of a separate self. I would think that the constant attention of another person, even the constant presence of another person, would make anatta very difficult as you would be constantly reminded of two selves...your self and the other person. It would make rejection of the limiting self -- already a very difficult task for those of us who are no where near enlightenment -- that much harder, I'd think. E.
_____________________________
"When you wake up, Pooh," said Piglet, "what's the first thing you say?" "What's for breakfast? What do you say, Piglet?" "I say, I wonder what's going to happen exciting today?" Pooh nodded thoughtfully. "It's the same thing," he said.
|