Heavy Bondage

Heavy Bondage (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

pinksugarsub -> Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 1:56:57 PM)
i have been using this phrase a lot and lately have realised S/some P/pl probably don't know what i mean when i say it. i'm talking about hogtying, arm binders, straight jackets and other restraints that put a body in a strained position, as opposed to, for example, being cuffed to a bed post where you lie in a more or less natural position. Is that what M/most P/pl think is meant by "heavy bondage"? Or is this something i should explain whenever i would use the phrase? Thanks for Y/yr thoughts. pinksugarsub

Lynnxz -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 2:00:44 PM)
It's a matter of opinion, probably based mostly on the bottoms flexibility. The "heaviest" bondage positions I have been in, may as well be easycakes for someone else. Likewise, armbinders and hogties are no strain on my arms and shoulders, so it's not all that bad for me. I was going to describe what was harsh for me, but I have no idea where to start, and I wish I had a pix of it.. I was pretty impressed with the top to say the least. ^_^

Floggings4You -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 2:29:53 PM)
Well, I wouldn't call wrists cuffed together behind the back, 'heavy bondage', though that is essentially the same position achieved by armbinders. Now, if you take 100 feet of 3/8" rope, and bind the arms behind the back, then another 100' of 3/8 rope and weave a corset that covers the body from above the pubic bone to just below the breasts (that includes nine 1 1/2" nickel rings as attachment points, then weave rope gauntlets out of 50' of 1/2" rope--each (complete with five 1" nickel rings as attachments points per forearm), then repeat on the ankles what you've done to the arms-- --you've spent the better part of an hour or more, and you now have someone wearing a dozen pounds of rope or more, and who is ready to be suspended... That's 'heavy'!

Aanakaris -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 3:38:14 PM)
So heavy bondage isn't tying somebody to an anchor? Howard

AquaticSub -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 3:43:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub Is that what M/most P/pl think is meant by "heavy bondage"? Or is this something i should explain whenever i would use the phrase? It wouldn't hurt to explain it. Your idea of heavy bondage is someone else's idea of a good tickle.

AquaticSub -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 3:44:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aanakaris So heavy bondage isn't tying somebody to an anchor? Howard That could be interesting, provided the anchor wasn't in use... Mmm... now I'm picturing bondage on the deck of a ship.

persephonee -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 3:51:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Floggings4You Well, I wouldn't call wrists cuffed together behind the back, 'heavy bondage', though that is essentially the same position achieved by armbinders. Now, if you take 100 feet of 3/8" rope, and bind the arms behind the back, then another 100' of 3/8 rope and weave a corset that covers the body from above the pubic bone to just below the breasts (that includes nine 1 1/2" nickel rings as attachment points, then weave rope gauntlets out of 50' of 1/2" rope--each (complete with five 1" nickel rings as attachments points per forearm), then repeat on the ankles what you've done to the arms-- --you've spent the better part of an hour or more, and you now have someone wearing a dozen pounds of rope or more, and who is ready to be suspended... That's 'heavy'! And very hot....

Aanakaris -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 3:55:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: Aanakaris So heavy bondage isn't tying somebody to an anchor? Howard That could be interesting, provided the anchor wasn't in use... Mmm... now I'm picturing bondage on the deck of a ship. That'd give new meaning to the term "Breath Play." I suppose now your going to tell me pony play isn't tying somebody to a pony... Howard

pinksugarsub -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 4:06:33 PM)
Sighs. So the consensus is, this is yet another thing i have to explain? Man, there's so litle nomeclature to rely on in D/s. O well...i can certainly do it. Thanks for the responses. pinksugarsub

JohnWarren -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 4:15:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote: ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub Is that what M/most P/pl think is meant by "heavy bondage"? Or is this something i should explain whenever i would use the phrase? It wouldn't hurt to explain it. Your idea of heavy bondage is someone else's idea of a good tickle. I'll second that. Of course, the degree of explanation depends on how much is needed. If someone said to me at a club "I do heavy bondage" I'd just say "Nice." If they said "I'd like you to do heavy bondage on me" I'd ask "What do you mean by that." If they say "I'd like to do heavy bondage on Libby" I'd say "Sit down; we are going to be talking for a while."

Leatherist -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 6:22:02 PM)
Total immobilization. No room to so much as squirm, like a fly in amber.

tsatske -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 6:37:12 PM)
Leatherist would like to pour boiling amber around someone? make a kind of sub paperweight? that could be better than a $5 sub sandwich, maybe even. That sounds almost as good as being burnt at the stake. I will have to ask Master if i can volenteer.

Leatherist -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 6:39:31 PM)
rolls his eyes.......[8\|]

takemeforyourown -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 7:32:27 PM)
I'm so friggin' hot reading this thread, will someone please friggin' tie me up? Like NOW?!!!

petdave -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 8:13:51 PM)
i'd consider a straitjacket to be a good ingredient for heavy bondage, especially if it's leather. Personally, i interpret it as bondage that achieves a very high degree of immobility, regardless of the amount of strain involved in the position. For example, being mummified head-to-toe in plastic wrap and duct tape, then secured to a padded table by a dozen or so belts doesn't really create any strain, but i'd consider it heavy bondage.

ViceVersa -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 8:19:52 PM)
I'd say that many of the photo essays on Serious Bondage qualify as heavy bondage for me. Vice

KnightofMists -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 8:21:52 PM)
mmmmmm I thought heavy bondage was chains equal in weight to the person that was going to be wrapped up in them.

stella41b -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 8:46:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub i have been using this phrase a lot and lately have realised S/some P/pl probably don't know what i mean when i say it. i'm talking about hogtying, arm binders, straight jackets and other restraints that put a body in a strained position, as opposed to, for example, being cuffed to a bed post where you lie in a more or less natural position. I'm not too sure about bondage. I'm thinking more of... asylums, psychiatric wards, 'secure' institutions for the mentally ill. But then again reading some of these threads also makes me think of such places.

chellekitty -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/4/2008 11:03:05 PM)
quote: I'm not too sure about bondage. I'm thinking more of... asylums, psychiatric wards, 'secure' institutions for the mentally ill. But then again reading some of these threads also makes me think of such places. do they have computers and internet access there...i'm looking for a nice vacation spot....

Dnomyar -> RE: Heavy Bondage (6/5/2008 3:23:27 AM)
takeme thats the best invite I have had in a long time.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125