RE: refreshing profiles

RE: refreshing profiles (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

SimplyMichael -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 11:03:04 AM)
Actually, people post links to CM profiles all the time, as long as what you are saying is positive. Not sure if I am allowed to do so as I seem to have a more restrictive interpretation of the rules applied to me but I am sure the rest of you should have no problem doing it.

CreativeDominant -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 11:30:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OmegaG I am not a tease. Damn!!! Where's the icon for that "damnit" snapping of the fingers? Alright...I finally did it. There's a pic of me on my profile now...not the best pic, I admit but I was on my way to a car show and in a hurry. My nephew hollered at me, I turned to look at him and he snapped. The one really good photo...of me with my grandum...they won't let me post, will they?

sirsholly -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 11:39:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Leatherist I could write a totally wonderful and appealing profile if I wanted to. And do it purely as a form of manipulation to get pussy....as I am sure many do-but why? leatherist has now left the boards to work on a wonderful and appealing profile

heartcream -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 1:42:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Leatherist I could write a totally wonderful and appealing profile if I wanted to. And do it purely as a form of manipulation to get pussy....as I am sure many do-but why? Do you think there are guys out there who have more intent than to manipulate to get pussy in an effort to write a really good profile? I dont know maybe I am foolish, but I think there is some guys out there not really trying to only get the p-word. It seems to me there are guys out there looking for the whole package and some guys out there who seem to have found it.

subfever -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 2:31:12 PM)
He said many do. Not all.

Hippiekinkster -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 2:32:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OmegaG It is because of that kind of outing that we can't possitively highlight profiles either, it's against the TOS Yeah, bummer. I wuz "featured prodile of de month" or some such on B.com. Seeing as how this was last year, and they'd been in operation since 96, that puts me in some rarified atmosphere, indeed. And I can't even spell "flogger"! Hahahaha suckers.

FullCircle -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 2:36:03 PM)
How much did you have to pay bondage.com to be featured?[8\|]

Hippiekinkster -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 2:38:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FullCircle How much did you have to pay bondage.com to be featured?[8\|] Sorry, man, I signed a non-disclosure agreement, and I take my legal obligations very seriously, unless I can fuck over a Republican somehow. Then - pthhhht! - out the window.

FullCircle -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/22/2008 2:42:15 PM)
If b.com was a UK political party and you paid them more that £2000 you'd have to declare it or you can get one of your employees to pay them indirectly and so keep you anonymity.[8\|]

heartcream -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/23/2008 6:18:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subfever He said many do. Not all. Yeah you are right he did. Thanks.

Real_Trouble -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/23/2008 7:40:31 PM)
And here I was trying to make my profile as depressing and unrefreshing as possible. Why must people counter my nefarious deeds? Why?

bipolarber -> RE: refreshing profiles (5/23/2008 9:51:14 PM)
I don't think posting something positive about a particular member is against TOS, is it? I mean, I've often mentioned how much I like the fiction on Aakasha's profile, for example, and no one seems to say anything... (If I'm wrong, I'm sure Mod 11 will take great pleasure in setting me straight with a bitchslap.) But I would think that pointing out excellence in some of the profiles, and journals is one way to keep the site quality improving. I mean, they are THERE to be read, right?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375