caitlyn
Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004 Status: offline
|
I totally agree, but in what form are these friendships? Take the relative disaster in Iraq for example. Clearly the nation was bent on war, no matter what. Was any agenda served by having American politicians go in front of the United Nations, and bold faced lying? How did that make Americans feel? How did it make all other members feel? Do we have good will now, or bad will? It's bad enough to be lied to by your own leaders ... but at lease Americans can vote them out of office. What of everyone else ... kind of at our mercy, and that just makes no sense to me. The problem is, when you contribute a lot, you want your way a lot. That just is, what it is. If the United Nations was a collection of equal nations, that might be worth the effort, but in it's current form, it is a collection of nations, and one giant, often infantile military powerhouse ... aggressive, spoiled, and so new at this superpower game, that fuckups are reasonably inevitable. Now, the alternative ... had the United States gone it alone, as they were bent on doing, and not cluttered up the United Nations with it's epic mistruths ... perhaps the United Nations could have, as a collection of equal states, gotten together to do something about Darfur.
< Message edited by caitlyn -- 5/16/2008 12:39:34 PM >
_____________________________
I wish I could buy back ... the woman you stole.
|