Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: in the ghetto........


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: in the ghetto........ Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/14/2008 11:32:01 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
Turn off the television, and quit letting it act as the baysitter for negligent parents. Smash the fucking thing if that is what it takes.
 
 Reinforce your own values by teaching them to your children,and seeing how it makes them prosper. Get your freaking tubes tied, and opt out of the gene pool if you aren't up to it. Have some compassion but make it tough, not enabling.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/14/2008 11:32:34 PM   
MasterKalif


Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004
Status: offline
seems most people seem to dislike Maggie since she had the guts to do what needed to be done, to turn Britain into a more modernized nation, her will and hand never wavering, otherwise Britain would be a statist as France, with high unemployment, and without all the new wealth and economic benefits the 'opennes' bought. Who heralds government ownership of enterprises ? Yes I have a soft spot for the Iron Lady.

< Message edited by MasterKalif -- 5/14/2008 11:33:16 PM >

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/14/2008 11:36:34 PM   
MasterKalif


Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004
Status: offline
On the topic at hand, I find it a horrible idea to disperse the ghetto people throught the cities of Britain, bringing malaise and bad habbits to neightborhoods that are foreign to that lifestyle....think about it, you worked all your life you enjoy living in a nice neighborhood, then next door to you these ghetto people are moved in, paying less than half the rent you pay, they are loud, obnoxious, they don't take care of the lawn (if there is any)....its abad idea any way you look at it. What needs to be done are concrete ideas to help those in the ghetto to live more decently, through education like days of old it was done, maybe with a ruler on hand by the teacher, make them sing "God Save the Queen", etc...furthermore, when it comes to adults, they need to be aware and strong enough to realize they want/need to help themselves before anyone can help them.

(in reply to MasterKalif)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/14/2008 11:38:49 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
I guess you will just have to round them all up and send them to Auschwitz then.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to MasterKalif)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/14/2008 11:40:57 PM   
MasterKalif


Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004
Status: offline
Leatherist....no, just keeping the status quo works for me...but then again I don't live in Britain, but I dislike the idea...

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 12:53:18 AM   
chickpea


Posts: 446
Joined: 8/3/2005
From: Los Angeles Area
Status: offline
I think they shouldn't classify people as useless and waste, unless a formal diagnosis is given to them by a doctor.  It's a long road out of a degenerate environment for anyone, so dispersing them and having them within a living structure that encourages productivity might help them.  It might also not help them as they will be "the bottom of the barrel" compared to everyone else.  I guess it will depend on the individual.  As for some, an aweful environment sometimes provides impetus for some to do better. 

But generally speaking, I think if they are placed in normal living areas, then they should be given the support and means to survive there, so they're less likely to end up contributing to the crime and succumbing to becoming beggars on the street.  Like if they provide them with lower rent, have some unskilled jobs earmarked for them, or have temporary subsidized money, and have a social worker check up on them...depending on individual situations or circumstances.  I heard of a program in New York City that earmarked a few percentage of units in some apartment buildings for lower income families or individuals, and charged them a much lower rate.  This was based on a lottery system.  Think if we care about our lowest, most degenerate people in our society (who are not so disabled as not to be a threat to the rest of society or can hold a low rate job) and give them the opportunity to succeed, then that would really help the society as a whole.  It will be a moral boost that we're helping someone else out and make us feel more like a community, not us versus them, and make everyone more productive at all levels of the workforce...not just the most elite.     (Again, in order for this to be successful, good planning and management of the social services is needed.)

I think keeping them in "ghettos" will just be a drain on society.  It will be like the overcrowding of jails in the U.S., where they're unproductive individual that taxpayers need to support and they all end up draining the government's money.  Besides, I think treating humans like animals is just wrong.  The human spirit is strong and they will definitely rebel in a negative way if treated in a negative way.  I think people act the way you treat them.  If you treat them like humans with the heart and desire to do better for themselves, and you respect that, you may be surprised by what you see.  As far as YOUR situation, I'm not sure what sort of persons you are talking about exactly, like if they are very crippled that hampers them from doing better?  Or are they just lazy or have a bad attitude?  I think those that just choose not to do better are beyond help.  They have to want to change.  My two cents.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 2:37:20 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks

It's commonly touted, this entree to the delights of home ownership that Thatch enabled but she really only handed our problems down to the next generation.. It's true that the widening of the market for sellers created by those selling their ex-council homes fostered a boom but the real source of all today's apparent wealth is of course credit.
<snip>
Thatcher excited the market and made a fortune for her backers in the banks but she also separated low-to-middle income families from a vital resource - social housing at steady, low prices - the key popular issue behind immigration fears. 




RL, jump in anytime, your views are always appreciated.

On the two points above, since everyone blames Thatcher for all todays housing woes. More social housing stock, most of it, has been sold off SINCE labour took office. Mainly due to a financial squeeze on local councils. If anyone doubts me check out who now runs the Local housing services.

As for todays credit woes, its 18 years since Thatcher left office, lets not play the "Blame Maggie" game and place blame where its due. Anyone who recalls London politics will remember it was the GLC under Horace Cutler, admittedly a Conservative, that started to sell off council housing. Thatcher just extended it, and no one since has decided to end it.

I would really have more time for some of these arguments, such as selling off assets, except you all fail to mention Labour is no different. Thatcher is the lefts version of pin the tail on the donkey, take of the blindfolds and you may find the current target.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:04:44 AM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
Its not just that Thatcher mandated the right to buy, she also legislated that the funds so raised by councils could not be reinvested in new housing stock - something even Cutler wanted to pursue.  It's not my game to defend Labour, but they were the prime movers (while in opposition) behind the Housing Corporation, the central govt route to fund new social housing.  It is true that the Labour leadership haven't reversed Thatcher's Act but many rank and file members wished to do so.

The current drive to build 50,000+ affordable homes in London is nothing more than an attempt at replacing an asset that we foolishly disposed with.  These assets were divided up between the banks and the borrowers have effectively passed the bill on to their children - as these new homes will be paid for by their taxes.  Once the eradication of social housing was set in motion - and with a housing boom about to materialise - Labour decided their best bet was not to reverse the policy but to present themselves as economic rain-bringers and merely finesse monetary policy reforms; remember non-endogenous growth theory?  It's only now that their cowardice in tackling fiscal policy is beginning to bite back as they run out of places to hide the tax rises which will be inevitable in coming years.

Sticking my neck out, I reckon the rightward trajectory of the Labour party leaves us without a voice laying bare the necessities of raising revenues.  Instead, Cameron will cut, cut and cut again in public services, a far cry from the promises you'll hear from them in the next 18 months, of course.  But the tories will mostly leave Brown's reforms in place, because they work... if what you want is to tax the rich as little as possible and the poor as much as you can get away with!

Its crazy to think that the colour of the rosette of the thief of national assets matters much.  The underlying problem is that neither side seems to demonstrate any real vision for the future, just a yearning for office.

< Message edited by RealityLicks -- 5/15/2008 3:08:01 AM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:24:13 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks
Its crazy to think that the colour of the rosette of the thief of national assets matters much.  The underlying problem is that neither side seems to demonstrate any real vision for the future, just a yearning for office.


Wonderfully concise and accurate!

But then I wonder how much of the absence of vision can really be held to be such? My view is, whomever we elect has long since lost any ability to govern, and that the true government has its UK representative assembly in the City, unelected and representing only it own interests and having the whole country from queen to the lowliest peasant in its grasp.

In such a situation, parties may not demonstrate any aspirational vision, since the true government will have its way whatever. Thus we get parties with wafer thin policy differentials between them, all occupying the same place on the political spectrum, because the proposed policies must be in accord with the aims of the true government.

We need the City, but we need the City to understand that it occupies space and is given permission to operate, by the people. It should not be the case that we the people are given permission to live here by the City. Unfortunately for us though, we are all far too busy fulfilling the aims set for us by the City, to ever be able to challenge its authority over us - not apathy, but fear of the modern aristocracy who can throw us onto the streets at any moment.

E


_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:52:29 AM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
Unfortunately for us though, we are all far too busy fulfilling the aims set for us by the City, to ever be able to challenge its authority over us - not apathy, but fear of the modern aristocracy who can throw us onto the streets at any moment.


The City has massive influence but don't forget that Ken Livingstone was their choice in the recent election and that as it stands, Gordon Brown is their man for the next general.  Its neither so simple nor so direct as you asssume.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 4:11:31 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
Ken and Gordon are as much in the grasp as anyone RL.

What the City want is business as usual, according to the standard of usual which has been engineered for their success. Anyone who can and will ensure that measure of usual continues, is their man. And their man also wants usual to continue, for that is what his platform is built upon.

For those few benefitting from it, its wonderful. For many, the electoral platform of our glorious supposed leaders, its fine - they have the illusion that it benefits them too; and perhaps it does as long as they play the game - a game in which one wrong move makes you part of the sizeable minority for whom it is the engine of disenfranchisement and woe.

I guess the issue I'm identifying is the widening wealth gap which I see as driven by the City. We dont need redistribution of wealth by way of taxation - we need redistribution of wealth by way of limiting the influence of the City to do anything which will not benefit the nation as a whole and benefit each member of the nation.

I'm expecting now a set of statistics which indicate the catastrophic effects on GDP and GDP per capita that what I'd like to see would mean. I hold these statistics to be interesting, but largely worthless in my aim. GDP per capita means nothing when 10% of the per capita population hold 90% of the wealth, and also thereby 90% of the opportunities, and another 10-20% are entirely poverty stricken for want of any means to improve their situations.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 4:46:36 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Ken and Gordon are as much in the grasp as anyone RL.



Talking whisky again, LadyE  ?

_____________________________



(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 9:35:55 AM   
stella41b


Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: SW London (UK)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Ken and Gordon are as much in the grasp as anyone RL.



Agreed. Only now we have Boris Johnson here in London. We will see what happens.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

What the City want is business as usual, according to the standard of usual which has been engineered for their success. Anyone who can and will ensure that measure of usual continues, is their man. And their man also wants usual to continue, for that is what his platform is built upon.



True, for both good and bad. What is business if not to make money? I have nothing against businesses making money, nor against capitalism. What I do have an issue with are the leeches and parasites in the City found among them who want to preserve their old 'arrangements' and 'not rock the boat' so that they can continue bleeding this country dry at the expense of the people. This was Thatcher's mistake which she committed with good intentions (though I never shared her ideology because you could see what was coming a mile off) but for which this country is paying very very dearly.

The Berlin Wall didn't fall for freedom and liberty, but for profit and access to cheap labour. No need to wonder whether I'm writing the truth here, just take a good look (and I mean a good look) at what's happening all around you.

This is where we have the main problem. This country needs change, but the City and their 'friends' in the media want to preserve the status quo. The idea of success should become quality of life and not making a profit at all costs.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

For those few benefitting from it, its wonderful. For many, the electoral platform of our glorious supposed leaders, its fine - they have the illusion that it benefits them too; and perhaps it does as long as they play the game - a game in which one wrong move makes you part of the sizeable minority for whom it is the engine of disenfranchisement and woe.



Exactly. Blaming the people at the bottom for their own misfortune and carrying on regardless clearly hasn't worked. It didn't work under the Tories, it hasn't worked under Labour, and it won't work under any other government.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

I guess the issue I'm identifying is the widening wealth gap which I see as driven by the City. We don't need redistribution of wealth by way of taxation - we need redistribution of wealth by way of limiting the influence of the City to do anything which will not benefit the nation as a whole and benefit each member of the nation.



Exactly. From what I can see a drive for profits, making people compete against one another and not addressing the problems caused by revolutionary changes in the way we live fuelled by advancements in technology hasn't created or increased wealth, but is actually threatening it and working against it. Perceiving people as a resource which is either profitable or not isn't working.. we need to completely ditch the concept of 'human resource' and get back to the concept of 'human'.

Having spent many years encouraging people to live beyond their means in some sort of illusory existence of affluence we now have one of the biggest social problems ever faced in our history, and that is to condition a large percentage of the population to return to living within their means and buying only what they can pay for. This is going to be something which is extremely difficult for any government to achieve, because you're asking the City to accept the necessity of greater investment for lower profits and smaller markets.

Hard as it may be for people to accept the only other alternative is to rebuild society from the bottom up. That 'underclass' of people at the very bottom of British society may well turn out to be our salvation and a key element to solving our problems. I feel therefore rather than perceiving them as 'problem people' we need to drop the labels, start perceiving them as 'people' just like us, and instead of shunning them and excluding them from society we need to find ways of bringing them back into society.

If there are less and less jobs to be found, then from what I can see the obvious solutions are getting those people dependent on benefits into some sort of occupation - community care, self-employment, entertainment, culture, sport, and through this occupation work with them to bring their own contributions to the community and to society as a whole. I am part of this process through what I am doing with theatre, but I am not the only one and what I am doing is just one tiny fragment of the whole current change in mindset.

These people cannot be just moved around or dispersed back into society. One London borough has tried. It decided it would solve the housing crisis by resettling homeless people into the private sector. One of the first cases was resettling a man with a long history of alcohol abuse miles away from his support network to... a double bedsit above an off licence. Anyone care to suggest what was missing here?

Before we can ever hope for any realistic political changes I feel we in ourselves as a society need to change some of our attitudes and to start finding ways of coming together as one nation and not two nations in one divided by income and occupation and lack of it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

I'm expecting now a set of statistics which indicate the catastrophic effects on GDP and GDP per capita that what I'd like to see would mean. I hold these statistics to be interesting, but largely worthless in my aim. GDP per capita means nothing when 10% of the per capita population hold 90% of the wealth, and also thereby 90% of the opportunities, and another 10-20% are entirely poverty stricken for want of any means to improve their situations.

E


We need to forget about GDP per capita and other statistics and get other statistics which will give us a better insight into what is actually happening in society. How many people are claiming benefits? How long? Why are they claiming benefits? How many people are homeless? We need to be taking a greater interest in those people at the bottom and looking for ways not to stereotype them and exclude them, but to help them make the changes they need to bring them back into society.

Yes it means more taxes, more spending on welfare, the development of new initiatives to enable these people to return back to society. It means facing up to the truth, admitting mistakes, learning to share, to cooperate, and to seek unity over division with others.

We need to listen to them to find out where they would like to be in society (from what is possible) and not impose on them where we feel they should be in society, and do what we can to help them achieve those goals. My theatre/charity has just done some research into what happens with people who have been on benefits and found employment through the Job Centre Plus offices and we have found that by and large, they have taken menial jobs in the service industry sector and within a year have had to go back on benefits. This is hardly a solution. This explodes the myth that people on benefits are generally lazy, they are just unwilling to take on employment which doesn't offer them any guarantee of remaining employed on a long term basis and from my perspective they cannot be blamed for refusing to take on jobs which quite often pay only slightly more than what they receive on benefits and which incurs additional costs such as travel.

Having seen at first hand the devastation and destruction of Eastern European society and the survival of the fittest mentality of the free market which has created numerous success stories but left behind a lot of poverty and a mass of social problems in its wake I can only conclude that Keynes did have a good point, as did Karl Marx.

_____________________________

CM's Resident Lyricist
also Facebook
http://stella.baker.tripod.com/
50NZpoints
Q2
Simply Q

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:07:28 PM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Ken and Gordon are as much in the grasp as anyone RL.


The salient point is not that all candidates are perforce aware of the influence of the City but that those whose policies and record suits the City best aren't always the ones calling the shots.  The difference between influence and power.



quote:


I guess the issue I'm identifying is the widening wealth gap which I see as driven by the City.


Well, I think that depends on who sets policy.  If you believe Parliament is totally in thrall to the financial industry, then naturally you believe every development is "driven" by the City.



quote:


We dont need redistribution of wealth by way of taxation - we need redistribution of wealth by way of limiting the influence of the City to do anything which will not benefit the nation as a whole and benefit each member of the nation.


If you can foresee a future where one of the world's foremost centres of naked capitalism is run with the regulatory stringency of a soviet command economy, you are imaginative indeed.  Tax reform is at least workable in the real world but decades of brainwashing clearly has many viewing that option as only slightly preferable to a tumbler of hemlock and Coke on the rocks.



quote:


GDP per capita means nothing when 10% of the per capita population hold 90% of the wealth, and also thereby 90% of the opportunities, and another 10-20% are entirely poverty stricken for want of any means to improve their situations.


And yet you reject tax reform and instead set store by the trickle-down theory; that being a billionaire's chauffeur will one day make you a billionaire too?  Okayyyy

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:33:17 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Just getting back to the OP : so the same people who have ruined large swathes of the UK educational system by introducing no fail  non judgemental mixed ability classes now want to make me live next door to some useless rotbag in order to further their ridiculous ideas of social justice?

Well I stamp my foot and tell these nitwits to kiss my arse

As for Ms Thatcher, who would believe that by 1979 in the UK we had had years of wasteful non productive government top down investment otherwise  known as I can spend your money better than you can. Bolshie Union activity bringing out the "werkers" every 5 minutes and inflation peaking at around 20%.
I think we needed a change , dont you?.

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 5/15/2008 3:40:53 PM >

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:35:03 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
You go, Seeks!

_____________________________



(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 3:59:42 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks

Its crazy to think that the colour of the rosette of the thief of national assets matters much.  The underlying problem is that neither side seems to demonstrate any real vision for the future, just a yearning for office.


Well said RL. This has been my stance all along, with both parties as bad as each other.

Brown now has it all to do, he has had an easy time with the economy. Anyone can run it right during a period of world growth. However i think he has also made some disaterous mistakes. One was allowing house prices to spiral due to low interest rates, between 1997 and 2007 they have almost tripled. Another was selling off 60% of the UK Gold reserve at near a 20 year low. Add to that a failure to provide proper balances to credit, such as mortgage companies being able to lend 5 and even 7 x income.

His main problem will be can he carry out his duties as Prime Minister, while spending most of it sorting out the financial crisis.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 4:09:59 PM   
BrigandDoom


Posts: 155
Joined: 12/29/2007
From: Nottingham
Status: offline
Excellent thread and very accurate in many respects. It is generally found that it is a small neucleus of trouble makers who bring an area or an estate down. There is also the problem of local authorities not maintaining properties properly and with either dis-interest fromn the residents or a resident committe who are ineffective then the problems continue.
There was an excellent program on BBC1 recwently, "The Estate we live in" , which the bassis was where a companing resident from what had been a very troubled housing estate in London, comprising of mainly flats had taken the bull by the horns after getting fed up with her surroundings. She found like minded residents in the area, they re-formed their residents committee, gave the local housing authority absolute hell and eventually they turned one of the worst sink estares in London into an area where people no longer wanted to escape from, but now wanted to move to.
They showed how the same lady was invited to assist some tresidents particularily run down and notorious block of flats in Plymouth, which suffered vandalism, grafittim fly tipping and general problem behaviour. She was askled initially to inspect the area, make comment and then assist the residents to improve it. In 12 months again she had motivated everyone into getting the building improved, got the residents committee back on track, helped get neighbourhood watch introduced, got the building security improved, buildings entrances made secure and turned into a place where people are proud to live. The big part was, she did some worjk, but she motivated very dispondent residents into action and they themselves did the bulk of the donkey work involved. It showed what a group of determined, well motivated people with goal can achieve given the right heklp and direction.
Glasgow City Council found the same when they started sorting out troublesome estates in the Goven and the Gorbals. This has reinforced the view that I've always had is that people are often a product of the area they were raised in.
As a child, if they are given decent surrounding and taught by their parents to respect them, then they tend to grow my well adjusted and well mannered useful members of the commun ity and society. Irrespectives of what some experts say, discipline begins at home, and a lot of todays problems are caused by people who have been too busy spoiling their brats, telling them that if they do something wrong it's not THEIR FAULT! Then they out looking for someone to blame! Deal with that line of thought and we would all live in a better world.

_____________________________

Brigand Doom

There is only one, accept no alternatives!

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 4:10:02 PM   
RealityLicks


Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Well said RL. This has been my stance all along, with both parties as bad as each other.

Brown now has it all to do, he has had an easy time with the economy. Anyone can run it right during a period of world growth. However i think he has also made some disaterous mistakes. One was allowing house prices to spiral due to low interest rates, between 1997 and 2007 they have almost tripled. Another was selling off 60% of the UK Gold reserve at near a 20 year low. Add to that a failure to provide proper balances to credit, such as mortgage companies being able to lend 5 and even 7 x income.


PS, you're funny.  They're both as bad as each other ... but Labour is worse, yeah?  How the electorate have hated watching their homes soar in value, as evidenced by the way they re-elected Labour to make more disastrous errors... THREE TIMES!

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: in the ghetto........ - 5/15/2008 4:21:10 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
RL, you miss my point. The current housing problem has been fuelled by dramatic increases. Like it or not it has happened, and i just wonder how Gordon will deal with it. Your maths is skewed as well, Labour were elected once and re-elected twice. I didnt even say Cameron will be better did i ?  

Seriously, will Brown let Darling sort out the economy and concentrate with his own job. My own view is he wont.

(in reply to RealityLicks)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: in the ghetto........ Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.297