Fucking Psycho

Fucking Psycho (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

BoySlip -> Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:18:31 PM)
Okay, so i just let a local mistress know that i am okay with seeing a mistress who is married so long as her spouse is aware and okay with it, and what times i am availible so we can schedule a meet, and she sends me this: "First it is NOT for me, I have a slave second you do NOT tell a Domme as long as you make no rules be gone!" Incomprehensible.

GreedyTop -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:20:20 PM)
block, ignore, delete..and consider yourself better off :)

divi -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:21:12 PM)
wow an insane Domme... Great pic GT !!

Daddysredhead -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:22:44 PM)
Full moon is just around the bend... maybe she feels the need to howl?

dodedo -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:23:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoySlip Okay, so i just let a local mistress know that i am okay with seeing a mistress who is married so long as her spouse is aware and okay with it, and what times i am availible so we can schedule a meet, and she sends me this: "First it is NOT for me, I have a slave second you do NOT tell a Domme as long as you make no rules be gone!" Incomprehensible. had she opened up conversation with you? did she seem literate? sheesh.

PanthersMom -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:25:59 PM)
there are nuts of all types in all walks of life. you just happened to come across one. PM

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:27:21 PM)
Well its a bit overkill, but she's not wrong.

Level -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:27:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoySlip Okay, so i just let a local mistress know that i am okay with seeing a mistress who is married so long as her spouse is aware and okay with it, and what times i am availible so we can schedule a meet, and she sends me this: "First it is NOT for me, I have a slave second you do NOT tell a Domme as long as you make no rules be gone!" Incomprehensible. Literally.

colouredin -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:28:11 PM)
quite, I have no clue what that means at all

xxblushesxx -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:28:34 PM)
lolol great rules OP. Move on. NEXT!!!....

GreedyTop -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:28:35 PM)
thanks, divi!! (compliments of Darcyandthedark :) )

lateralist1 -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:29:24 PM)
I'm really sorry that you were treated so badly. I'm afraid there seems to be a lot of people who do not seem to know how to behave towards one another in the lifestyle as in vanilla. However do not let it affect how you treat others. I'm sure that you will find the right partner in time.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:31:31 PM)
Why is she not wrong? You mean subs/slaves can make no rules before they even submit? That's not what you meant, is it?

FullCircle -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:41:02 PM)
I hate capital NOT's that's all. I also can't understand what she is saying but I think it is as below. "First it is NOT for me, I have a slave second you do NOT tell a Domme as long as you make the rules be gone!" Very bad grammar all round. Not sure how any of this makes her a Psycho. If she'd asked you to stick your tongue out while she nails it to a table top I might reconsider.

BitaTruble -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:46:42 PM)
~FR~ Okay, maybe I'm confused but that reads to me as though you contacted someone out of the blue, let them know what was okay with you, the times you could meet at your convenience, then got a little bent out of shape that you weren't wanted by a complete stranger so decided to vent a bit in the forums. How far off am I? Vowels are $250.00 bux a pop. [sm=bury.gif] Celeste edited to add: Nice thread title - not really what one would expect out of the 'shy, timid' type you portend in your profile.

SteelofUtah -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:49:47 PM)
LMAO See I have a BIGGER issue here. Why in the FUCK is a Domme seeking subs for another Domme? Anyone else find that more than just a little retarded? Look I have set people up before and I have introduced some subs who 8 years later are still with thier Masters and I have directed Dom's to subs who would be in thier desire range. I just don't understand seeing a sub for someone else. The whole thing just smells like Bad Fish to me. Why go through the process with someone just to be handed to someone else seems like an aweful lot of hoops but then again I have been informed that even thought it shouldn't be... male subs and Female Domme's are a different process than Male Doms and female subs ..... I still call Horseshit but I have heard it from more than one source so who knows. Look OP just ask yourself is it really worth the bullshit and if the answer is no then count your blessings and move on Steel

BitaTruble -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:55:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SteelofUtah LMAO See I have a BIGGER issue here. Why in the FUCK is a Domme seeking subs for another Domme? Anyone else find that more than just a little retarded? Look I have set people up before and I have introduced some subs who 8 years later are still with thier Masters and I have directed Dom's to subs who would be in thier desire range. I just don't understand seeing a sub for someone else. The whole thing just smells like Bad Fish to me. Why go through the process with someone just to be handed to someone else seems like an aweful lot of hoops but then again I have been informed that even thought it shouldn't be... male subs and Female Domme's are a different process than Male Doms and female subs ..... I still call Horseshit but I have heard it from more than one source so who knows. Look OP just ask yourself is it really worth the bullshit and if the answer is no then count your blessings and move on Steel How did you come to the conclusion that one dominant is seeking submissives for another dominant? The OP is very unclear about, well, pretty much everything but that's not even in the ballpark. [sm=ofcourse.gif] Celeste

SteelofUtah -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:57:36 PM)
quote: Okay, so i just let a local mistress know that i am okay with seeing a mistress who is married so long as her spouse is aware and okay with it, and what times i am availible so we can schedule a meet, and she sends me this: "First it is NOT for me, I have a slave second you do NOT tell a Domme as long as you make no rules be gone!" Incomprehensible. That is why I thought what I thought.... and I still think it. Steel

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 1:58:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx Why is she not wrong? You mean subs/slaves can make no rules before they even submit? That's not what you meant, is it? I interpreted what she said as: "It's not ok for me to be with people who are married, and you don't tell me what to do or what rules to make if we're not getting involved with eachother" And I agree with Bita.

SteelofUtah -> RE: Fucking Psycho (4/19/2008 2:01:44 PM)
Okay reading it that way and in that context I see your point and yeah I would agree with you too LA. The Grammar and Flow of this is so poor you can change the inflection on any group of words and end up with a completely different meaning. So I can see why what I thought confused people but can you see now where I thought what I thought? Steel So OP.... WTF??

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125