The mountain of lies behind Clinton

The mountain of lies behind Clinton (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

SugarMyChurro -> The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 4:19:33 AM)
Wal-Mart for President? http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/35172-wal-mart-for-president New footage from the Center for Public Integrity confirms what Hillary Clinton has conveniently omitted from her website and campaign speeches: she was on Wal-Mart's Board of Directors for six years, from 1986-1992. It was during those six years that Clinton served with the notoriously anti-union Rose Law firm in Little Rock, defending Wal-Mart against workers who tried to unionize. It was also during those six years that Clinton served with fellow board member John Tate, whose favorite saying was: "Labor unions are nothing but blood-sucking parasites living off the productive labor of people who work for a living." ----- I just don't see how Clinton can be characterized as anything like a traditional Democrat. She and her husband have been Republicans in Democrat disguises from the first. Maybe the bigger issue is that in fighting for the middle the two parties are only distinguishable by mere degrees.

cyberdude611 -> RE: The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 5:02:51 AM)
You are making it sound as if only Republican politicians lie. I dont see how Hillary telling a lie or hiding information automatically makes her a Republican. Both political parties are as corrupt as hell. If you think the Clintons are Republicans that pretty much tells me how far off into left-field you really are. I dont see how anyone could think Clinton who favors higher taxes and universal healthcare as a Republican. I doubt many would agree with you on that.

SugarMyChurro -> RE: The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 5:14:07 AM)
Bush favors higher taxes. He is the one the created the need to raise them. The next president has to deal with that simple truth. Clinton's version of universal healthcare is just more corporate welfare. Republicans love corporate welfare.

Aquilifer -> RE: The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 5:53:46 AM)
Well, I'm not going to be singing arias about Saint Hillary anytime soon. That being said, the choice between her and McCain, if it comes down to that, is like a choice between double pnemonia and metastatic lung cancer. You might survive the pneumonia, and with luck, you might even get your health back eventually. With the metastatic lung cancer, not so much.

xBullx -> RE: The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 6:08:46 AM)
Do you ever go back, read and attempt to construct a credible thought with much of what you write? You are so filled with contempt and angst that it is starting to be apparent that the misinformation you construct is looking like facts in your mind. I view your efforts much the same as you view Hillary's. But you are right, she is a lying bitch. They all are.

pahunkboy -> RE: The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 7:10:47 AM)
Bush did raise taxes. to support his baseball team in TX. the sales tax increase and to this day ppl still pay it.

Sanity -> RE: The mountain of lies behind Clinton (4/13/2008 7:33:38 AM)
Now that your mind is finally right about the Clintons, you need to start seeing Obama more clearly, for what he really is. quote: ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro Wal-Mart for President? http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/35172-wal-mart-for-president New footage from the Center for Public Integrity confirms what Hillary Clinton has conveniently omitted from her website and campaign speeches: she was on Wal-Mart's Board of Directors for six years, from 1986-1992. It was during those six years that Clinton served with the notoriously anti-union Rose Law firm in Little Rock, defending Wal-Mart against workers who tried to unionize. It was also during those six years that Clinton served with fellow board member John Tate, whose favorite saying was: "Labor unions are nothing but blood-sucking parasites living off the productive labor of people who work for a living." ----- I just don't see how Clinton can be characterized as anything like a traditional Democrat. She and her husband have been Republicans in Democrat disguises from the first. Maybe the bigger issue is that in fighting for the middle the two parties are only distinguishable by mere degrees.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.027344E-02