RE: Exploring an Edge (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


probablyknowme -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 4:48:11 PM)

Thank you Walter for clearing that up for me. I, personally, was well on my to a full head of steam about it.

kat




xolarkinxo -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:00:49 PM)

quote:

He started screaming “No more, no more”, which is his safeword.  We kept going.  He kept screaming........       We stopped when it felt like enough

This seems to be an example of a TPE.  It became the tops decision as to when enough was enough.  It is something I would enjoy as well.  Within my relationship I like Tacs to have the power anyway; not me with a "stop sign."




laurell3 -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:16:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtee

Thank you, although, I'm not concerned about the actual words, I'm concerned about the parties agreeing to use a safeword, and then ignoring it, when it was, well, screamed.

Many don't use safewords, it's not required. I don't, however, think it is wise to set up the agreement, have it be used in the scene and then ignored. I don't want to judge, but I'd not like to have newbies or anyone believe that their use of a safeword may be ignored; that, you know, it happens; that it's not irresponsible and wrong to ignore a safeword that has been agreed upon.

According to the narrative, big, strong pain "pig" Al felt the need to use the words, whatever they may be. I think it's disturbing to ignore it if you're going to have the option.


Those were my thoughts as well and the postings subsequent to these don't alleviate my concern.  I understand the point is to push him past that point.  I understand you agreed that you didn't have to stop.  What I don't see here is any description that indicates that when this "big strong man" starts screaming his safeword there is any communication to ensure that he is actually ok until AFTER the fact.  Yeah, not so hot to me.  Sorry, call me conservative.  I do get the concept, I don't agree with the implementation.  You don't have to be me though.




subtee -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:18:36 PM)

~FR

Thanks Walter, it's appreciated and I do understand your inquiry. This is a public forum and for some, safewords are there for a reason, not to be ever, ever ignored. This is how if one can't breathe or is in some other, possibly life-threatening distress, there is recourse for the good of both of them. TPE doesn't necessitate the negation of safewords. A "stop sign" that is in place is there for a reason. In other cases of TPE, it's understood that there will be no safeword. "Neer the twain shall meet?"

It seems they should have agreed to forgo the safeword? Or there should have been inclusion in the OP that the safeword would be ignored and that that condition was agreed upon by all parties? It is still troubling to me that he used the safeword and it was ignored; his subsequent comments indicating that it was distressing no matter how pleased they all ended up. What if he had been in real trouble? It was indicated he could take a hell of a lot, so I assume using the safeword was as a result of intensity, even for him.

I haven't read the original post from which this one was generated, however, many probably haven't. Again, this is a public forum. I'd not like for folks to understand that an agreed upon safeword is meaningless if the top(s) decide mid-scene to ignore it.




xxblushesxx -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:19:11 PM)

Then what the hell is the point of a safeword?
What if he realllly meant it?
I'm sorry, but IF I had a safeword, and HoneyMaster ignored it...it would not end well for Him...[sm=evil.gif]
I just think this is wrong for a lot of reasons.
What if he started having heart palipitations, but was not in a headspace to convey that?
What if he wasn't breathing correctly, but couldn't get the words out to tell you?
I do not find this safe.
I think you need to always respect another's safeword, or 'stop now'.
It sounds a bit like rape to me.




ThinkingKitten -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:31:15 PM)

I am generally in favour of safewords - especially from the standpoint of medical emergencies. I certainly wouldn't venture into anything extreme without there being one in place. Its a weird thing to define though - how else do you handle it when someone wants to be taken past what they themselves think is their stopping point? Do you negotiate a whole different set of words/signals? Keep the usual one, knowing it will be ignored, but add something else to define a physical issue "9-1-1" for example? Would that be too complicated? I don't know. Never been there, and really don't plan on ever getting there to find out!




SirJohnMandevill -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:53:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: breatheasone

I have two safe words....a slow down one...and a stop one.... looks like that may have been a good option here.


Same with me and my newly found submissive. We had a very intense play session recently, during which she begged me to stop again and again...but used neither safeword. I grabbed her hair each time, looked her in the eyes and said simply, "You're lying," and went back to flogging her. Then, when I switched to my bare hand, she twice used our "slow down" safeword before finally using our "stop" word.  A classic case of pushing her to her limit while remaining SSC. Extraordinarily erotic and satisfying for both of us.
 
Les (Purveyor of Fine, Handcrafted Kink)




LadyLolly -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 5:58:39 PM)

Taking someone beyond thier breaking point, past thier limits is edge play.  I understand the concern about ignoring a safeword. 
Many make comment they don't need or use safewords as they trust thier Dom/me to know.  This was a pre-negotiated scene to do just that with a long term partner cognizant and comfortable reading him.     




LaTigresse -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:00:49 PM)

Tee, I think I understand where you are coming from. I am also taking into consideration several different factors which lead me to not be upset at all.

First of all these are people that are in a relationship. They have a history. They've created alot of trust in one another. That trust is based upon time spent together, really learning one another. Knowing each other's strengths, weaknesses, limitations, etc. I think I might feel differently were this not the case.

Also, I read that there was alot of prior discussion. That this guy really wanted to be pushed far beyond anything he had experienced before, beyond what he was conditioned to believe he could take. In that situation I think the safeword would be a conditioned reaction that perhaps he wanted exceeded.

Then, we need to consider another thing. We all do a good job talking about but are quick to forget about when it suits. Trust in the dominant's judgement. The sub/slave letting go and giving ALL power to the dominant. Apparently this guy felt he could do that.

So, all of that being said I am going to suggest that we all avoid passing any sort of judgment unless the other party says that she really did exceed his limits, regardless of the technicality of the safeword issue. Unless he says he did get taken too far past his personal edge and suffered damage he could not handle. Because the reality is that for him, it may have been one of the most amazing experiences of his life. We don't know because we don't have his input.

Lastly, yes I agree this is a public forum. However, if anyone that comes into this site and reads the forums and takes every word as their BDSM bible, they have bigger problems that any of us can help them with.

We are all grownups and should be able to process any, and all information then filter out what will work positively for us, what will not work and what is just pure crap. We all preach about how, what works for me might not work for you, don't judge, etc etc etc........ I think this is one instance where that applies.




subtee -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:17:44 PM)

Okay, I'll bow out. I apologize...






LaTigresse -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:25:00 PM)

Tee, no need to bow out. I just wanted to present some other possibilities to consider. It is really easy to jump to conclusions and judgement based upon our own life, experiences, and perceptions. I do it ALL THE TIME. Something I am not always proud of and am trying to change. I was thinking in outloud/in type, as much for myself, to work through understanding this as much as pointing it out to you or anyone else.




Bound2One -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:25:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyLolly

Taking someone beyond thier breaking point, past thier limits is edge play.  I understand the concern about ignoring a safeword. 
Many make comment they don't need or use safewords as they trust thier Dom/me to know.  This was a pre-negotiated scene to do just that with a long term partner cognizant and comfortable reading him.     



Yes, I know what you're saying, LadyLolly.  I'm disturbed by the top ignoring the safeword, however, many relationships don't have safewords, so .... while there is a subtle difference, it sounds like the bottom had a true need to be fully in his top's hands with no responsibility on him for stopping play.  It's a very, very fine distinction, one which someone newer to BDSM may not pick up on, so I also understand other poster's concerns about how this post could be taken. 

Food for thought ...




xolarkinxo -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:31:27 PM)

quote:

TPE doesn't necessitate the negation of safewords

quote:

  In other cases of TPE, it's understood that there will be no safeword.

Subtee,  How pc to include two versions of TPE. I quess it all depends on how you define the word "total" in Total power exchange.  I use the Webster's or American Heritage dictionary so technically any word coming from my mouth would not be stopping play; it would be up to the one with total power.  That's my take anyway.  And, Tacs and I have been together awhile and he knows me well, and (to cover all disclamers, I hope) we agree on things like this beforehand. 
Larkin




subtee -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:35:41 PM)

As I said, I apologize




LadyLolly -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 6:43:31 PM)

Absolutely, IF the familiarity and competence was not there
                 IF his condition had not been properly monitored
                 IF care had not been taken in prep and aftercare
                 IF taking past safeword had not been negotiated
Then there would be issue with it - since all were present there is not.
           




xxblushesxx -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 7:30:11 PM)

Ok, look...
HoneyMaster and I do not have a safeword.
But usually He can read me well enough to know when I am in distress.
One time He didn't.
It could have been deadly.
And he is a doctor. (twice over)

I'm just sayin...

~Christina




breatheasone -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 8:49:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirJohnMandevill

quote:

ORIGINAL: breatheasone

I have two safe words....a slow down one...and a stop one.... looks like that may have been a good option here.


Same with me and my newly found submissive. We had a very intense play session recently, during which she begged me to stop again and again...but used neither safeword. I grabbed her hair each time, looked her in the eyes and said simply, "You're lying," and went back to flogging her. Then, when I switched to my bare hand, she twice used our "slow down" safeword before finally using our "stop" word.  A classic case of pushing her to her limit while remaining SSC. Extraordinarily erotic and satisfying for both of us.
 
Les (Purveyor of Fine, Handcrafted Kink)

Oh good God....thats JUST HOT!!.... i'm jealous....[;)]




Bound2One -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 9:10:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyLolly

Absolutely, IF the familiarity and competence was not there
                IF his condition had not been properly monitored
                IF care had not been taken in prep and aftercare
                IF taking past safeword had not been negotiated
Then there would be issue with it - since all were present there is not.
          


Nodding ... yep, I see your points. 




lighthearted -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/18/2008 9:33:55 PM)

what LaT said.  thank you.




MmeGigs -> RE: Exploring an Edge (2/19/2008 5:08:13 AM)

quote:


Many don't use safewords, it's not required. I don't, however, think it is wise to set up the agreement, have it be used in the scene and then ignored. I don't want to judge, but I'd not like to have newbies or anyone believe that their use of a safeword may be ignored; that, you know, it happens; that it's not irresponsible and wrong to ignore a safeword that has been agreed upon.


We don't really use safewords, and we never use codewords - stop means stop, no means no, if he has a cramp or something, he says so in plain language.  Al's "No more, no more, no more" (that wasn't a typo) is his way of indicating that things are getting a little too intense and he needs a break.  It does not signal distress.  I shouldn't have called it a safeword in this post, I suppose, but that is the way his "no more" operates. 

quote:


According to the narrative, big, strong pain "pig" Al felt the need to use the words, whatever they may be. I think it's disturbing to ignore it if you're going to have the option.


My Al uses those words in pretty much every beating scene he's involved in.  He likes to get to that point where it's almost too much.  If I don't get those words out of him at some point in a beating scene I feel like I've let him down, but when he says them I stop immediately and check in with him.  The scene I described was the one and only time those words have ever been ignored, and it was at his specific request. 

It was really important to him that he experience this at some point in his life.  He gives me everything and asks for little, so I wanted to do this for him.  As I said in the reality check portion of the post, the beating only continued for a few minutes beyond him saying he'd had enough.  It was a weird thing for both me and the other top to have ignored his safeword - while we were very endorphinned up, I think we were both also pretty nervous about it and very aware of what was going on with Al. 

Could we have damaged him?  Sure thing, and we knew that.  We've done things that carried more risk of physical damage, though.  I think I put Al at more risk of physical damage when I let him give pony rides for two hours than I did with this scene.  We were aware of the risks and took steps we felt were appropriate to mitigate them.  That's what responsible kinkyfolk are supposed to do. 

Whether or not the scene was over the line depends on who draws the line, I guess.  I can definitely see how folks could be disturbed by this scene.  It disturbed me when he said he wanted to do it, and we had to talk about it a lot before I was comfortable enough to attempt it.  I don't think that anyone would get the idea from my post that it's okay to ignore a safeword or that it's something that people commonly do.  It may have been more palatable if I had left in the lines in my quote about how we'd talked about it for years, or if I'd gone into more depth about the preparations we made and the technical end of things, or if I just hadn't used the word "safeword". 




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1113281