|
RCdc -> Ryan 'schoolgirl' advert banned - gives me an idea.... (1/30/2008 10:07:12 AM)
|
This is Darcy Budget airline Ryanair were forced to withdraw an advert that featured a model in schoolgirl's clothes with the headline "Hottest Back To School Fares" after they received fifteen complaints from readers of three daily newspapers, the Herald, the Daily Mail and the Scottish Daily Mail. Here's the link to the BBC News story...... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7216926.stm This got the Devil's Advocate in me thinking - if just fifteen complaints can get a relatively harmless advertisment effectively banned, and is, in the words of the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) "likely to cause serious or widespread offence", then I wonder how many complaints it would take to get The Sun's Page 3 banned? For those of you outside of the UK, The Sun is a tabloid rag largely written by morons for morons (i.e. lots of pictures and words of generally two syllables or less), but which features every day, on Page 3, a picture of a topless young woman. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm all for boobies, but given that young children are exposed (no pun intended) to this (as I'm sure the Daily Mail would have it) 'filth' every day (except Sunday - wouldn't want to rile the Church, would we? [;)]), I just wonder what would happen if enough people (say, the members of a community based forum) wrote to the ASA, or the Press Standards Agency, and complained. How many would have to be offended before they forced The Sun to drop it's topless nubile beauties? Hmmm, just a thought......... NB. As a side question here, particularly for those of you outside of the UK, what are your thoughts on Page 3? Do you think it's acceptable to have topless young ladies in a family newspaper (as The Sun insists it is)? Is it pornographic? Offensive? Or just harmless fun? Over to you..........
|
|
|
|