RE: For the doms and male subs

RE: For the doms and male subs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

laurell3 -> RE: For the doms and male subs (1/18/2008 7:38:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I would wear the ring on the end of my cock and have them suck it off. Ron Ron, have you ever looked at ring sizes? You'd have to have either a miniscule cock or she'd have to have gigantic hands for that to work, although having an oral obsession if it was possible I would certainly appreciate this approach. Of course, you'd have to make up some falsehood to tell others about the engagement (well I would). In all seriousness asking a person to marry you should probably be about the person. If a role-based approach works for her great, but I think many women would prefer a romantic one regardless of role.

sexyred1 -> RE: For the doms and male subs (1/18/2008 7:40:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I would wear the ring on the end of my cock and have them suck it off. Ron... honey... sweetheart... babe... do you REALLY want a girl with fingers that tiny? Cali [sm=biggrin.gif] you are a riot girl!

CuriousLord -> RE: For the doms and male subs (1/19/2008 1:48:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OldBastardly1 Actually , it is not so interesting. Why complicate things when you don't need to. People have been asking other people to marry them for ages. Just ask. Just like a non-lifestyler would. Be romantic. See? To me, this is contradictory. "Why complicate things when you don't need to" versus "Be romantic". For me, it's just, "We're getting married." Three words; it's simple and to the point. This isn't to say the wedding can't be romantic, that there's no love in it.. simply, it isn't a question.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

8.203125E-02