RE: bukkake

RE: bukkake (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

daddyncherry -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 6:39:19 PM)
It's defintiely one of those icky but intriguing kinds of fantaises, and intriguing partly because it is sooooo out there and icky....i'd sooo have to wear some kind of eye protection though lol cause that stuff totally hurts when it gets in yur eye and you can't see for awhile...and that is just with one "shooter".

christine1 -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 6:44:02 PM)
i have a few 'out there" fantasies and this is one of them....the humiliation would be out of this world!

KaylinSilverfurr -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 6:47:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie Wow, I never knew there was an official name for it! It's a huge fantasy of both of ours, but we have the same issue you mentioned - knowing enough men who would be comfortable with it, and who can show evidence of being disease-free. Which? The Cum Marking? It's usually known as facials, or "a pearl neclace" if done on the body and breasts. It called something else if done on the navel...but my mind fails me at the moment. ~Kaylin

sunshinemiss -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 7:42:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Prinsexx quote: ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty The more I think about it, the more I think about it. wink it's just such a lovely word....bukkake bukkake bukkake....the more i say it the more I say it....like a mantra....in my head of course...as I haven't tried wandering around saying it out loud......do you think there would be a following? Come on over to my place... A lot of people speak Japanese here... Oh yes, there would be a following... *Imagines a pied piper-esque trail of Asian men following Prinsexx up the mountain....

CuriousLord -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 7:57:53 PM)
Tasteless.

MissMagnolia -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 8:00:41 PM)
ICK!! That is all.

TallDarkAndWitty -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 8:18:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Tasteless. Hmmm...I have heard it is salty and tastes slightly of chlorine. But I have no first hand experience... Maybe you need to get they guys in your bukkake group to change their diets. Taggard

Lordandmaster -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 9:06:09 PM)
Indeed it was. It was invented in order to circumvent Japanese censorship laws prohibiting images of penetration. quote: ORIGINAL: tigerstyle I dunno, it seems like the kind of thing that was mainly created by the porn industry.

Justme696 -> RE: bukkake (1/15/2008 10:07:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Tasteless. Hmmm...I have heard it is salty and tastes slightly of chlorine. But I have no first hand experience... Maybe you need to get they guys in your bukkake group to change their diets. Taggard Depends of what you ate. I ate once a lot of candy, and she said it tasted very sweet quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster Indeed it was. It was invented in order to circumvent Japanese censorship laws prohibiting images of penetration. quote: ORIGINAL: tigerstyle I dunno, it seems like the kind of thing that was mainly created by the porn industry. Yes the nice mosiacs in te movies were the result of that. Small blocks over the sex acts, and no unshaved body parts

ExSteelAgain -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 1:59:44 AM)
The way to do it is to change it around with 2-3 women all on their knees waiting for one guy to shoot cum over their faces. Much sexier that way, don't cha think?

Justme696 -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 2:08:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain The way to do it is to change it around with 2-3 women all on their knees waiting for one guy to shoot cum over their faces. Much sexier that way, don't cha think? :D yesss!!!

ownedgirlie -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:37:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Tasteless. No more than calling other people's fantasies tasteless.

RCdc -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:40:01 AM)
Here is a thought this made me have. How many people does it take for it to be offical 'bukkake'? Three? Thirty? Three Hundred? Inquiring minds an all that.[;)] the.dark.

mnottertail -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:42:19 AM)
I think it is measured by volume, not by weight. MasterShipper

TallDarkAndWitty -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:42:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark How many people does it take for it to be offical 'bukkake'? Three? Thirty? Three Hundred? I don't think two would classify as bukkake...three might be just meeting minimum requirements. With four, you certainly have a bukkake on your hands...or face...or whatever... Taggard

Jeffff -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:42:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark Here is a thought this made me have. How many people does it take for it to be offical 'bukkake'? Three? Thirty? Three Hundred? Inquiring minds an all that.[;)] the.dark. I suppose it depends on whether you want a full or partial glaze? Jeff

ReflectingHonor -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:43:44 AM)
Traditional Japanese Bukkake dictates 100 men....

KaylinSilverfurr -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:46:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ReflectingHonor Traditional Japanese Bukkake dictates 100 men.... That's ALOT of peni(?) to be had. ~Kaylin

cainssub -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:46:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tigerstyle I always think of some kind of overhead "Dancer In The Dark" camera shot with the penises arranged in a flower shape around the upturned face, all jacking in sync like women doing esther williams moves or busby berkley dancers. i just got the visual, lol nice....

RCdc -> RE: bukkake (1/16/2008 8:52:11 AM)
Hmm... not much room to spare with 100. Quite honestly, does not appeal. Whilst I understand it is supposed to be pretty much humiliating for whoever is suppose to be the splashback, there is something that doesn't feel right to me about 100 odd men, all jacking off in front of each other in a manly and dominant 'rape' scene. S-type men, yes - but a bunch of dominants? It just comes across as very 'Carry-On'. Yeah, so I call me old fashioned. the.dark.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875