RE: Definition (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


OmegaG -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 10:46:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilentTigresss

Now that i've been back on this site more than not lately, i have noticed something in profiles that i am curious about. What i've noticed was that "they" (keeping it somewhat generic) are looking for "sub/slaves". Is it the idea of just not being specific in what you seek, is there no longer a difference in the two, or well... what is it?



I had a much stricter definition of slave in my head then he did, and he's got a less committed defenition of submissive then I do.  Plus he likes the sound of "slave" better and I don't have an objection.

I think that communication and a full understanding of the definitions of each term are in order rather then assumptions based on personal paradigms.




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 10:57:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

I had a difficult time trying to decide if I should label myself as a sub or a slave. I had more than a few long discussions about this with my master. I ended up calling myself a slave because... um...
My master had a good explanation to why I'm a slave, but I tend to forget all the good explanations he has as soon as I''ve decided that he's right. Which is most of the time. ;)
So, you'd have to ask him.

I wouldn't pay much attention to weather someone is seeking a sub or a slave if I was looking for a relatioship. There's so many definations to the terms and it's hard to know what the other person meens if you don't know them.


why do you think you are a slave and not a sub. If you don't mind the question.




kuuntuli -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 11:11:20 AM)

Because my master tells me so. :)

I think it's because I get my kicks from serving and pleasing him as much as I can. I don't have any particular kinks, I tend to like whatever pleases my Master.

He had a much longer and better explanation though, I can ask him to post it.




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 11:25:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

Because my master tells me so. :)

I think it's because I get my kicks from serving and pleasing him as much as I can. I don't have any particular kinks, I tend to like whatever pleases my Master.

He had a much longer and better explanation though, I can ask him to post it.


lol  ofcourse you have to listen to your Master, but I don't think a MAster decides if you are sub or slave. But hell..who am I ;)




kuuntuli -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 11:37:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

Because my master tells me so. :)

I think it's because I get my kicks from serving and pleasing him as much as I can. I don't have any particular kinks, I tend to like whatever pleases my Master.

He had a much longer and better explanation though, I can ask him to post it.


lol ofcourse you have to listen to your Master, but I don't think a MAster decides if you are sub or slave. But hell..who am I ;)



Well, really, he didn't say that I have to call myself a slave, but he did make very good points about why he thinks I am one. I ended up agreeing with him. So it's not really because I'm so obedient (that's why there's the smiley there), it's just that talking with him cleared the whole consept in my mind and I ended up agreeing with him.




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 11:39:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

Because my master tells me so. :)

I think it's because I get my kicks from serving and pleasing him as much as I can. I don't have any particular kinks, I tend to like whatever pleases my Master.

He had a much longer and better explanation though, I can ask him to post it.


lol ofcourse you have to listen to your Master, but I don't think a MAster decides if you are sub or slave. But hell..who am I ;)



Well, really, he didn't say that I have to call myself a slave, but he did make very good points about why he thinks I am one. I ended up agreeing with him. So it's not really because I'm so obedient (that's why there's the smiley there), it's just that talking with him cleared the whole consept in my mind and I ended up agreeing with him.


ah ok.. thank you




DesFIP -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 2:21:42 PM)

One person's sub is another's slave. You can be a slave in one relationship yet a sub in another. You can start in a relationship as a bottom, move to sub after trust and sufficient commonalities are found. You could move to slave if you feel that more appropriate with that certain someone.

Or you could be a slave in one relationship and a dominant in another. There is no hard and fast rules that apply to the human heart.




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 2:27:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

One person's sub is another's slave. You can be a slave in one relationship yet a sub in another. You can start in a relationship as a bottom, move to sub after trust and sufficient commonalities are found. You could move to slave if you feel that more appropriate with that certain someone.

Or you could be a slave in one relationship and a dominant in another. There is no hard and fast rules that apply to the human heart.


I totally agree,  i just understood first that her Dom decided what she was.




SilentTigresss -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 4:52:27 PM)

It is nice to see that there can be some openess to other's idea's and view's and opinions.i think communication is key and, of course, helps make definition between the two involved clear. Nothing is ever black and white.




juliaoceania -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 5:01:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

Because my master tells me so. :)

I think it's because I get my kicks from serving and pleasing him as much as I can. I don't have any particular kinks, I tend to like whatever pleases my Master.

He had a much longer and better explanation though, I can ask him to post it.


lol  ofcourse you have to listen to your Master, but I don't think a MAster decides if you are sub or slave. But hell..who am I ;)



To be honest, I do not like the term "slave" because of the historical connotations behind it. I could fit most people's definition, and I would still not like the term. I submit to pretty much anything he decides he wants me to submit to. I do not voice objections even when tempted to. I suppose I consider myself as limitless as anyone else I have seen posting on this site (although I know I have limits)... just do not like the term. If he wanted to call me his slave, I wouldn't argue with that either.

He can call me whatever he wants to call me. In fact in my mind there can be no better reason for labeling oneself a slave than their D-type wants them to call them that.




SilentTigresss -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 5:02:56 PM)

julia,  i will finally say it; i do enjoy your posts.
Thank you.




juliaoceania -> RE: Definition (1/15/2008 5:07:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SilentTigresss

julia,  i will finally say it; i do enjoy your posts.
Thank you.


Thanks... blushing here




ExSteelAgain -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 1:49:06 AM)

Who needs definitions? I just make them up to suit my purposes if I am asked to define what a certain woman is. A woman may need to be defined and I will give her what I think is best to reach my goal, whatever that may be. Definitions are nebulous free spirits and shouldn’t be locked into anyone’s view. I’ll use my poetic license to free them. I’ll give her a name that presents her in a good light, no matter what she does or what outlandish fetish she may have. By her acts after she has accepted my definition she is going to define herself. For instance, she can become a beautiful woman to me and to herself because she loves me. Simple... strokes my ego and hers. 




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 2:02:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

Who needs definitions? I just make them up to suit my purposes if I am asked to define what a certain woman is. A woman may need to be defined and I will give her what I think is best to reach my goal, whatever that may be. Definitions are nebulous free spirits and shouldn’t be locked into anyone’s view. I’ll use my poetic license to free them. I’ll give her a name that presents her in a good light, no matter what she does or what outlandish fetish she may have. By her acts after she has accepted my definition she is going to define herself. For instance, she can become a beautiful woman to me and to herself because she loves me. Simple... strokes my ego and hers. 


Defintions and the discussion about the use of them is difficult.
IS a car a car...or a motercycle with 2 extra tires?
Definitions are not always just to put peopel in boxes. It makes it sometimes (sure not always as we see) eassier to know what we talk about.




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 2:04:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: kuuntuli

Because my master tells me so. :)

I think it's because I get my kicks from serving and pleasing him as much as I can. I don't have any particular kinks, I tend to like whatever pleases my Master.

He had a much longer and better explanation though, I can ask him to post it.


lol  ofcourse you have to listen to your Master, but I don't think a MAster decides if you are sub or slave. But hell..who am I ;)



To be honest, I do not like the term "slave" because of the historical connotations behind it. I could fit most people's definition, and I would still not like the term. I submit to pretty much anything he decides he wants me to submit to. I do not voice objections even when tempted to. I suppose I consider myself as limitless as anyone else I have seen posting on this site (although I know I have limits)... just do not like the term. If he wanted to call me his slave, I wouldn't argue with that either.

He can call me whatever he wants to call me. In fact in my mind there can be no better reason for labeling oneself a slave than their D-type wants them to call them that.


I had problems too with the word slave, but as I see black people use the word also on here...i stopepd worrying about it afther talking to them.
( I use black people, because Afro American doesn't fit for me, I am in Europe)
Gladly I live partly with Gorean interest and can call the girl  ~kajira~

I think a lott about this subject, especially because my country has still collonies in middle america. On most subjects the caucasian majority seems to worry more about the past, then the people in the colonies. 




ExSteelAgain -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 2:08:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696
Defintions and the discussion about the use of them is difficult.
IS a car a car...or a motercycle with 2 extra tires?
Definitions are not always just to put peopel in boxes. It makes it sometimes (sure not always as we see) eassier to know what we talk about.


Oh, I know and we've had this discussion many times with what you said usually being the consensus. Still I wanted to put a twist on it and give us something to think about that may be close to the truth of what actually happens.  




Justme696 -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 2:22:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696
Defintions and the discussion about the use of them is difficult.
IS a car a car...or a motercycle with 2 extra tires?
Definitions are not always just to put peopel in boxes. It makes it sometimes (sure not always as we see) eassier to know what we talk about.


Oh, I know and we've had this discussion many times with what you said usually being the consensus. Still I wanted to put a twist on it and give us something to think about that may be close to the truth of what actually happens.  


I totally agree, doesn't mind to remember people, we talk about persons here..not the boxes they fit in




SilentTigresss -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 3:31:27 AM)

Since i don't know how to do multiple quoting... julia.. [sm=lol.gif]  you're welcome.

Gentlemen, thank you for the twists.




tulitukka -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 3:48:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

One person's sub is another's slave. You can be a slave in one relationship yet a sub in another. You can start in a relationship as a bottom, move to sub after trust and sufficient commonalities are found. You could move to slave if you feel that more appropriate with that certain someone.

Or you could be a slave in one relationship and a dominant in another. There is no hard and fast rules that apply to the human heart.


I totally agree, i just understood first that her Dom decided what she was.



In a sense, I did. The fact that she wants me to decide these things, and all others in life (UMs and some other exceptions aside) is what, to me, makes her a slave. I lead through persuasion, mostly and wish to build common understanding on these matters.

She knows very well that she does not have to let me decide these things. But she wants me to, or perhaps I should say needs me to. Life is so much better when my grip on her is firm and loving and much worse, if it weakens.




adoracat -> RE: Definition (1/16/2008 5:16:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

Take a look at all the submissive vs slave debates and you'll have your answer. 
Exactly. I identify myself as a submssive, however I fit what some here would label as a slave. So, I gather that the people that put that in their profile are open to talking to people that identify in either role.


*nods*  i identify as a submissive, but Daddy says i'm a slave.

kitten




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.589844E-02