RE: Gang bang was poor (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Griswold -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 7:17:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bbwsarah1980

Hello

This is my first post
Anyway i recently did a group sex session with 5 guys
and the results where well poor
premature ejacultion was a big issues, are there any women with advcie on this or how to aviod it next time in a group situation please?

Peace

Sarah


Hmmm....well....uhmmm....I...uh....well....ahhhemmm....




thornhappy -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 8:45:46 PM)

Why Gris, that was right eloquent of ya.

thornhappy




dawntreader -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 8:57:30 PM)

Well according to her profile, she is looking to do 10-20 the next time...




FangsNfeet -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 9:07:49 PM)

You are the sub who pleasured 5 men. They got what they wanted so what's the problem? If there's something lacking after you've been used, I suggest you get a vibrator. In a Gang Bang, your pleasure is normally not a concern for the others. They just want to whip it in, whip it out, and not fuck about about.   




Griswold -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 9:09:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Why Gris, that was right eloquent of ya.

thornhappy



(I took speech classes).




sammiebabygirl -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 9:16:33 PM)

I belong to a swinger's club and we have women of all ages, shapes and sizes.
 
We have an event that some women try to achieve, called "Earning Her Medallion".

To earn it, she must have sex with and bring to ejaculation, 10 men.  

Most of the women are lucky if they can find 3 willing guys, let alone 10. I have talked to several of the male members about their resistance and most say that they are uncomfortable having to perform in front of a room full of other men.
 
So, I would say to the OP, that she should consider herself lucky to have gotten what she did.
 
jen




Griswold -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 9:29:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Why Gris, that was right eloquent of ya.

thornhappy



(I actually took a poetry class).




dawntreader -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 9:34:43 PM)

Now THAT'S funny![:D]




Griswold -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 10:23:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dawntreader

Now THAT'S funny![:D]


Ya know....this is where the whole men v. women thing loses it's whole grip.

(I can rhyme ya know).




dawntreader -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 10:54:43 PM)

THAT's a relief!!!![:D]




Griswold -> RE: Gang bang was poor (12/31/2007 11:07:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dawntreader

THAT's a relief!!!![:D]


(Many women have said that about me).




MissSCD -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/1/2008 7:44:40 AM)

First of all, I don't owe any explanation to you as to how I think.  You do not know my background.
I have witnessed a gang bang rape scene in a Dungeon setting, and it all happened so quickly that we did not have time to leave.  Needless to say, this is not how I view BDSM at all.
From what I saw, it was energy in motion where the Domme in charge lost all control over the situation. 
The way this post was worded leaves me to be very suspicious of its real intent.  I think she is bluffing.  My post was meant to be sarcastic at the OP, not at you, Miss Perfect. 
 
Good day.
 
MissSCD
 



quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

 
quote:

hope you practiced safe sex.  I sure wouldn't be bragging about this even if I was poly.

 
First question, why would you assume that she didn't practice safe sex? Secondly, do you think that there is something wrong with a gang bang, or enjoying consensual group sex so that a person shouldn't "brag" about it? And lastly, do you believe that gang bangs have anything to do with being poly?




bipolarber -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/1/2008 8:05:16 AM)

I think the obvious solution is to set up the next GB with partners who don't have problems with premature ejaculation. Asking the guys to jack off first will only create MORE performance anxiety, both from "putting on a show" with others in the room, and then the pressure of getting it up again... No, you need to find people who have been in this sort of scene before and who aren't "weirded out" by being in a semi-public setting. Then again, your first set of playmates have now been "baptized" into playing together... so with repetition, the nervousness should subside.





juliaoceania -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/1/2008 8:31:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissSCD

First of all, I don't owe any explanation to you as to how I think.  You do not know my background.
I have witnessed a gang bang rape scene in a Dungeon setting, and it all happened so quickly that we did not have time to leave.  Needless to say, this is not how I view BDSM at all.
From what I saw, it was energy in motion where the Domme in charge lost all control over the situation. 
The way this post was worded leaves me to be very suspicious of its real intent.  I think she is bluffing.  My post was meant to be sarcastic at the OP, not at you, Miss Perfect. 
 
Good day.
 
MissSCD
 



quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

 
quote:

hope you practiced safe sex.  I sure wouldn't be bragging about this even if I was poly.

 
First question, why would you assume that she didn't practice safe sex? Secondly, do you think that there is something wrong with a gang bang, or enjoying consensual group sex so that a person shouldn't "brag" about it? And lastly, do you believe that gang bangs have anything to do with being poly?




It is rather amusing that I ask people questions, and based upon those questions they get all bent out of shape. I did not attack you or your views, I just asked you to clarify statements made on a public message board.. I was assuming you wanted to share your views because you posted on the thread... you don't want to, fine by me.

Your post to the OP sounded judgmental (as cali stated a few posts down) and it insinuated that poly people all enjoy gang bangs (which is not true at all). I did not want to assume you were being nasty to the OP, so I asked the questions... I suppose you were being nasty, and that is why you are now attacking me.  Finally, the post is in "off topic" section, so no, it has nothing to do with BDSM... and that is why it is listed in this section. We are allowed to talk about things that have nothing to do with BDSM in this section.

My interests do not lie in getting gang banged, but I totally support a woman's right to engage in whatever kink she prefers. Your opinion differs with that, well fine by me, no skin off my nose. It is called "disagreeing", people do it all the time without name calling.




xAdamx -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/1/2008 8:36:56 AM)

smiles....take it from me, you won't find many g/bangers on this site on many other D's site.....have a look on bespoke swingers sites.....handled right g/b is fantastic erotic play...go for respectful males between the ages of 30/50...quality beats quantity every time....




CalifChick -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/1/2008 10:03:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Griswold

(I can rhyme ya know).


"I don't like green eggs and ham, I don't like them Sam I am" doesn't count Gris.

Cali




thornhappy -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/1/2008 11:33:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

quote:

ORIGINAL: Griswold

(I can rhyme ya know).


"I don't like green eggs and ham, I don't like them Sam I am" doesn't count Gris.

Cali


Yep, and limericks are rated at 50% off, too.

thornhappy




FangsNfeet -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/3/2008 8:26:53 PM)

Sometimes you just need the right song for a good Gang Bang

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYpRJghaxrs&feature=related




dcnovice -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/3/2008 9:03:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cankles

I think this is what they call a "First World Problem."


[sm=biggrin.gif] [sm=biggrin.gif] [sm=biggrin.gif] [sm=biggrin.gif] [sm=biggrin.gif] [sm=biggrin.gif]




Moloch -> RE: Gang bang was poor (1/3/2008 9:06:47 PM)

This one time and bandcamp...




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125