RE: Does your BDSM relationship have to include pain, discomfort and restraint in order to still be BDSM (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


CreativeDominant -> RE: Does your BDSM relationship have to include pain, discomfort and restraint in order to still be BDSM (12/20/2007 2:54:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MystressDream

quote:

ORIGINAL: CuriousLord

My relationship's M/s.  There's no sadomasochism and very little bondange involved (the extent to which is not at all unusual in the vanilla world).

This said, is it BDSM?  I don't think so.  But, meh, BDSM has M/s in it, as part of it, so I still share things in common with some members of this community.


It amazes me over the years how people have struggled over defining who they are and what they do.  I agree with general lables, per se, when you first start talking to a potential partner, as it helps to know which way the rest of the conversation will go, but, if I am talking to someone, it doesn't take long to figure out where they are within all of this.  One or two questions is all it takes.
 
FOR ME... I have always believed something similar to what LA has said...unless I have misunderstood her.
 
BDSM... bondage/discipline/sadism/masochism
 
It wasn't until much later that some decided to lump D/s into there just because the two letters also show up in the BDSM acronym. 
 
FOR ME... D/s is completely seperate.  D/s and M/s are who and what we are.  BDSM is activities some of us enjoy.  Simple as that.
 
As far as the comments about "isn't D/s without BDSM just a vanilla relationship?", well, kind of.  Think of the 50's lifestyle that many refer to.  Technically, my parents had the classic D/s relationship.  Dad ruled the house, supported the family, it was a patriarchal household.  Mom waited on him, took care of the home, and made sure all of his needs were met.  What Dad said, was the way it was.  No arguing.  Were they D/s?  As I have said, technically, yes.  But, no hint of BDSM existed.
 
As Master Fire has stated...... in a D/s or M/s relationship, the sadist and/or masochist can wear either power exchange lable or both.
 
I think the mass confusion comes in when people try to lump D/s into the BDSM acronym... thus, refer to everyone in this lifestyle as being in a BDSM lifestyle when, in fact, that may not be true.


I read through this whole thread, thinking of my answer...and here in MystressDream's words...IS my answer.  She said it clearly and I agree with her.  For me, D/s is Domination and Submission.  The accepting of the control of the will of another and exertion of control AND the yielding of control of will to another and aceepting of their control and guidance.  Nowhere in those...admittedly deliberately simple BUT basic...definitions is there anything said about giving pain and receiving sexual pleasure from doing so (sadism), receiving pain and feeling sexual pleasure from doing so (masochism), bondage ( restraint of another using ropes, ties, what have you), or discipline (correction of behavior/a manner of behaving).




MissSCD -> RE: Does your BDSM relationship have to include pain, discomfort and restraint in order to still be (12/20/2007 3:06:03 PM)

Our relationship is based mostly upon power exchange.    We don't sceen that much anymore.  We are able to keep the relationship simple and still have the authority we wish to have.

Regards, MissSCD




trueshadow -> RE: Does your BDSM relationship have to include pain, discomfort and restraint in order to still be BDSM (12/26/2007 2:58:49 PM)

BDSM is different than D/s.  I personally enjoy and need a bit of both.  While I am a slave, I find I need correction to further my growth as a slave.  I really enjoy taking the pain administered by my Superior, to show her that I can take it for her, endure it for her.  I so reinforces my slavery that I cannot imagine D/s without it. 

Being flogged, ordered around, having my balls crushed in her hands while I stand at attention means slavery to me.  I also enjoy serving her, as that is part of the control she exerts over me. 

So, yes, pain and suffering, at least to me, is essential in bdsm (of course) as well as D/s.




Leatherist -> RE: Does your BDSM relationship have to include pain, discomfort and restraint in order to still be BDSM (12/26/2007 3:27:43 PM)

I'm into this for kink. I'm vanilla otherwise..I have enough to deal with in my own life-having to worry over controlling someone else would be burdensome for me.




Evility -> RE: Does your BDSM relationship have to include pain, discomfort and restraint in order to still be (12/26/2007 3:40:56 PM)

I don't think there is a "one size fits all" definition. His explanation is one way to look at it. For what it's worth, he has summed up what BDSM or D/s or S&M is all about to me. He has described my particular dynamic in about as lucid a fashion as I have seen, but it's still just one man's opinion.

It's a shame you chose to make the "twue" comment in another post. He has his opinion as you have yours. The difference is that he did not make fun of yours with his.





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125