|
tyku -> RE: the fallout of hypnotism, and other mental forms of BDSM (12/16/2007 9:03:01 PM)
|
Do you just assume the sub will be with you forever so it wont matter?
No.
how do you guard against permanant damage?
How to start...
On Permanence:
The only things that are mostly permanent are physiological changes. Any mental changes that are not physiological in nature(meaning so long as you don't have a lobotomy or something like that) can be realtered however one desires given there is someone competent in the methodologies and procedures of brainwashing, etc.
Also, I say "mostly permanent" to allow for a number of different possibilities: a miracle, a major scientific breakthrough in some applicable area, all people with the skill or ability and all of the storehouses of said knowledge to make the required change are destroyed in some otherwise irrevocable way, and finally anything that might not fall into one of those categories.
On Damage:
All is process. Process is processing. Do a recursive loop back to the beginning. If you went through a process that changed you then that same process should be able to change you again. This time it would probably be useful to install a change that you are the designer of.
On Guarding:
I think that the greater the risks the more one should either start at a reasonably safe change, or seek whatever education is available first to maximize safety while minimizing risks for the application of whatever level of change it is that you desire to stop at given some context and the level of consent between participants.
On Context:
Content - change.
Context - the set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular event, situation, etc.
I think that it's important to supply sufficient context for any content. Or in other words: In order for you to do or be (content), (context) must happen.
ex: In order for you to use the appellation "Master", for an individual other than yourself, the person you're referring to must be accepted internally, by you, as your master without any coercion(if coercion is applied to gain acceptance: appellation given is internally meaningless).
If the context isn't specific enough the content can, and will be, acted out in contexts where the behavior may not be desired.
If the context is too specific the change won't be elicited in at least one desired context.
If the content isn't specific enough, is incorrectly specified, or is too specific you will probably have some undesired outcomes.
ex:
In order for you to orgasm, you must be touched on the hand.
In order for you to have an orgasm, you must be given permission by me, and only me.
And, finally..
On Consent:
To be completed in the future if necessary.
|
|
|
|
