|
Rover -> RE: Is pleasure from pain a submissive trait? (12/15/2007 7:54:14 AM)
|
I'm certainly in no position to pass judgment over what you *are*, nor would I want to if I could (well, unless you had a paid subscription). But I think it's worth noting that there's a meaningful difference between being a Dominant or submissive in a relationship dynamic, and being a Top or bottom for sensation play. They are not one in the same, or interchangeable. Having said that, divining one's relationship role based upon whether they are engaged in the "active" or "passive" role for sensation play isn't very accurate either. Many Dominants assume (and enjoy) the "passive" role of receiving massages, oral sex, etc. and many submissives assume (and enjoy) the "active" role of giving them. It would be similarly inaccurate to judge one's role in a relationship dynamic based upon what sensation play is enjoyed. Although many of the activities enjoyed by bottoms are associated with submission in that they are more commonly found in submissives, it is not exclusively so. There are Dominants that enjoy the physical sensations of bottoming without the inclusion of any submission (ie: it's the physical sensation alone absent any power exchange). And finally, the water becomes even murkier when you begin to assign meaning to activities that really lack any common association with either Top or bottom roles, much less Dominant or submissive roles. Scratching (who doesn't enjoy a great back scratching?) and biting may fall into that category. In summation, I don't think it's possible to make any legitimate determination about an individual's role in a relationship dynamic based solely upon selected pleasures derived from sensation play. John
|
|
|
|