cbtok
Posts: 70
Joined: 3/2/2004 Status: offline
|
I think that there is no candidate that would come out in favor of anything other than the Judeo-Christian Victorian ethos. And that suggests that women have no fun in their bedrooms (unless it's combing their hair), that couples be male and female (genetically) and married and all sexual congress performed exclusively for the purpose of procreation, multiplication and subduing the Earth. And, quite frankly, when it comes to my bedroom, I have absolutely no interest in any government ever considering what does, may, might or could happen in that location. And that includes sleeping. I appreciate the goals of the NCSF but I think that the existence of that well-meaning group is a sign that government in the US has chosen to invade privacy. I regret that there seems to be a need for organizations like that, as well as organizations determined to assure gay, lesbian and transgendered persons their rights. If you are human, you have inalienable rights IMHO. And that includes the privacy of your home and the nasty judgment of others. These people in government who have an interest in transgressing on these rights of others certainly have deep psychological problems. And for them, I recommend a rubber room. …which could be pretty kinky in itself, heh, heh…
_____________________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions?
|