|
MsBearlee -> Punishment...a new angle (for me) (12/5/2007 1:15:49 PM)
|
I discovered BDSM and specifically D/s about four years ago, and I embraced it as only a newbie can and jumped in with both feet. While I have no problem with just about any of the real-time philosophies…I struggled with ‘Punishment’…and continue to do so. Awhile back, Michael posted something which rang true for me: http://www.collarchat.com/m_1430753/mpage_2/key_/tm.htm#1432683 It has been my contention that when a submissive gives over power to another, it is because s/he wants to please him. (Please bear with me; I’m not going to use all possible sexual possibilities here.) I mean, a (normal) adult who gives the promise to follow the lead of another just isn’t going to do stuff behind their back, or to piss them off; s/he wants to please, after all. (Keep in mind please; I am not discussing online stuff or ‘brats’ here.) Michael discusses inspiring submissives to surrender power…and I think that is exactly what happens in a good match. From there, it seems to me that should s/he miss a mark or do something totally wrong…simply sitting the submissive down for a talking to is more than enough. I am all in favor of saving the beatings for fun! Michael tells us his girl grows and the depth of what she will do for him expands to the point he is sure she would do/try anything to please him. Now, that’s what I’m talking about! So… "Why punish?", I’ve asked. And then, I ran into these posts by Stephann and Julia: http://www.collarchat.com/m_1439067/mpage_5/key_/tm.htm#1442101 The idea that punishment can be a tool “for reminding a submissive of her position as a slave/submissive”! Wow… an eye opener for me! Thank you, Stephann. All this time I knew some things were done ‘because We can…’ and I rather liked that; but I never in a million years considered that it was to reiterate the submissive's position. Perhaps that is why so many enjoy humiliation...it is an exaggeration of this act? I wonder. For four years, I have believed as Julia does; “Either I submit, or he seriously questions my desire to do so.” It’s back to that “Of course s/he can refuse…but they'd have to leave if they did”. Okay, so communication IS a huge deal in any relationship I have, but were one to begin saying ‘No’…it would be the beginning of the end. Either submit…or do not. Done. But now… this idea that punishment might be purely an act to put the submissive in a proper headspace is intriguing. I remember once, watching close friends of mine interact. She had been slightly argumentative, he’d had enough; he told her to put her hands on his arm and to “…look at me and settle!” She did…you could see her visibly calm down. When she had settled a bit, he reached up and grabbed her hair and drug her (gently) to the floor next to him, where she laid her head on his lap. I nearly swooned. I bet she tries to be calmer around him. LOL Anyway, this is getting wordy. Can you see how different ‘punishment’ is for me than the stereotypical ‘OTK spankings’ some enjoy playing? Still, because of the couple of threads I read this week…I’ve had a real eye opening. While I doubt I'll ever take a boy over my knee, punishment has a new meaning for me. Anybody else? MsB
|
|
|
|