Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Mismatched Playmates


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mismatched Playmates Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/1/2007 6:34:18 PM   
PairOfDimes


Posts: 324
Joined: 7/20/2006
Status: offline
I think she had fun and he didn't. I think that other people could certainly have used the same first two sentences, and then written as a third sentence "What a fantastic scene!" Being ignored, denied, caged, electrified, and made to do housework can all be really hot things, and the overtone of indifference that he seems to have felt is also something some people I've known have claimed to find hot.

Indifference, denial, caging, etc. can also be unpleasant things. After all, *I* wouldn't like to sit in a cage or to be electrically stimulated! :) I can affirm--and so can they, although her account seems more detailed than his--the actions that happened. What I can't affirm was whether they were satisfying, or exciting, or boring--actions aren't inherently satisfying, exciting, or boring, that's something the actors add.

Was the scene meant to be 'special' and talked up as something unique and fantastic? That can be a problem--it sets up a high pressure environment, and it makes it really difficult for the person directing the scene (if you do something known to be effective and good, you run the risk of being routine and boring--but if you try something new and it goes poorly, then the scene also isn't fun).

If it wasn't meant to be special, why was he assuming that it would be special? (As a footnote, his weekday nights are much more exciting than mine, clearly.) This could prevent further anticipation/disappointment cycles.

If I was "her," and I wanted more scenes with "him," I'd ask what made the scene unsatisfying, and what ingredients might have been added or eliminated to make the scene more satisfying. Then I'd think about whether I was interested in doing any of those things, or whether I was interested in doing anything close to those things.


(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 2:40:42 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I should have entitled the thread 'Mismatched Expectations'. It seems that all of the ingredients were there to make a successful scene, but each person brings their own expectations and that can change entirely dependent on intentions. I think, in the OP, the intention for the dominant was to initiate a punishment of sorts, denying the submissive the pleasures they perhaps receive generously and something which would normally be received in good faith - ie paying the piper, but from what I gather there was a reactance on that occasion.
quote:

ORIGINAL: arayofsunshine55
It's hard to imagine doing all of that with someone who didn't enjoy it in any way.  Even that was enjoying not enjoying it. But that is me.   I want us both to enjoy it.  And the reality is, it is rare that I'll hurt someone, I hope we'd both find it special.  If not, I would really consider whether we were well-matched.  There is a lot of overlap hopefully between what I enjoy and what he enjoys.  More than enough to have a grand time.  And then there are the headgames, assuming that floats his boat as much as it floats mine.

There is no right or wrong.  There are two people, two viewpoints, two different perceptions.  That's life.  How do you manage when you differ, not those are the relationship skills I really look for.

(in reply to arayofsunshine55)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 2:49:01 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I think we all need affirmation, eyesopened, regardless of orientation. It is important to gain feedback and I personally appreciate it whether it be positive or negative, what I hope for is that when I interact with a person we each have gained and learned from our interactions with one another.

Going back to the OP, their dynamic is unclear, although the fact the dominant takes the submissive to their bed suggests a romantic involvement and the seeming 'indifference' shown during the scene was them attempting to make a point - perhaps a punishment for the submissive, and the resultant reaction was simply that, a reactance.
quote:

ORIGINAL: eyesopened

my relationship with my first Dominant was not a romantic one, and i'm not clear as to the dynamic of the couple depicted.  In my case, i was not looking to be 'special' but i still needed positive feedback that i had done well, had been pleasing to my Dominant.  my need in the relationship was to learn and grow in service and submission.  As long as i could go home knowing that i had accomplished something, learned something, gained a greater insight, then the evening was a success.  One of the best lessons He ever taught me was to change my focus from me and what i could do to just being pleasing and what does He need, want, desire. 

After a time, there were no more lessons.  He used me for His delight but i was not learning or growing, the times together were predictible, stale and without challenge.  When we discussed this, He told me He had taken me as far as i could go.  What i clearly heard was "I've taken you as far as I care to take you."  Since i had not signed on for the long haul, it was time to go and i did.

(in reply to eyesopened)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 2:56:07 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I think in the OP the dominant 'got it wrong' on that occasion, that each persons's mindset was misaligned and so were each person's expectations. In my own relationship, naturally I want my submissive to enjoy our interactions but there are some occasions where the 'enjoyment factor' is not important to the lesson I am conveying as the process is part of a long-term goal.
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania
I do not know what to say, because the play is just an extension of my feelings for my Daddy. I know it is hard to remain focused on topping me for that many hours of play, and I would be grateful for the time he spent... even if I did not experience the sensations that I had hoped to. The bottom masochist part of me does get sated, but the submissive part of me does not expect that to happen all the time.

I think that the expectations may be misaligned perhaps?

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 3:01:35 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I doubt in the OP that the dominant was uncaring, there suggests a romantic involvement and the overall tone of the scene is that the submissive wasn't meant to enjoy their day, so that suggests a form of punishment.
quote:

ORIGINAL: yourMissTress

This could be one of 2 things in my opinion.
 
1.  How many people don't ask for all that they want?  How many people assume that certain things don't have to be asked for? 
 
A sub says "I want to serve you, clean your house, take care of all of your needs, be objectified, locked in a cage, tortured, denied food and water, teased and denied orgasm and all for your pleasure."  But means, I want to do all of these things but you really have to be paying some attention to me, following me around with your crop and spanking me when I don't do things right, objectify me but, treat me like a person while you do it, lock me in a cage and torture me, but make sure that I'm comfortable, tease me and deny me orgasm until I really want to cum, and once you have done all of this, I would like you to forget about any of your own needs and wants and ask me what would make this special for me.
 
2. Some people just don't care about their partner, in which case they won't have one for very long.

(in reply to yourMissTress)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 3:06:58 AM   
Owner4SexSlave


Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
If you ask me, sounds like the male sub/slave did not understand when he was being punished and for what specific reasons.   Sounds like a communication issue for starters, hence why there are do different versions of the story.

I have always made it a point to clearly express myself, and my reasons for doing something, what was wrong, and how the other person can correct/fix things.  

So, there appears to communication problem if you ask me.

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 3:11:34 AM   
Owner4SexSlave


Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Assuming this is a relationship mismatch, again good old fashioned communication before hand should have worked.   Where both parties knew the expectations and mindsets of each other.

I'm actually suprised the mistress does not understand her sub/slaves mindset, as well as I am shocked the sub/slave does not understand her mindset.

Communication is so important before rushing into a BDSM relationship.  Then again, some people simply jump feet first without taking time to get to know each other.   BDSM relationships are still relationships and you have to be compat with each other.  This is probally the number one thing that bites most people in the ass, at least in my opinion.




< Message edited by Owner4SexSlave -- 12/2/2007 3:13:10 AM >

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 3:14:51 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Thank you for your post, LaMspeach. The overall tone in many posts is that the dominant was seemingly uncaring and the submissive was somehow hard done by in that their needs had perhaps not been met or considered by the dominant. I have a completely different viewpoint. If it had been just a case of play, then I'd agree that terms weren't discussed and expectations were misaligned. But the OP suggests a romantic involvement given they sleep in the same bed. and my own opinion is that the submissive wasn't meant to actually enjoy that day's interactions and that the later inclusion of the intimacy of cuddling/foot/leg massaging, etc... was a display of affection from the dominant, conveying their submissive was valued and regarded with deep affection regardless of the previous necessity for punishment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaMspeach


I had to learn to serve because it was part of my submission to him not because I was looking for special or hoping for something in return. When we as submissives/slaves do something in order to get something we are often let down because we don't get what we hoped for.
He allowed her to torture him in hopes for "special" (whatever that was) and was let down  because he didn’t get the reward he wanted.  In my eyes the rewards was being allowed to cuddle and watch a movie with her while massaging her legs and feet.

Maybe she is trying to teach him to learn the pleasure of serving with out wanting a reward in return.

Also agree with Lena, we cant give and give and never be made to feel special or receive that reward because after  awhile the well will run dry and we will have nothing let to give.

(in reply to LaMspeach)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 3:27:38 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
LuckyAlbatross, I have read a few of your previous posts and enjoy the insightfulness you bring to each one.

From what I glean in the OP and each person's differing viewpoints of the day's events, it would seem that the dominant had taken areas the submissive would normarily enjoy and used them in a deliberately unpleasant way, so that to me suggests a punishment and the later displays of intimacy/affection were the dominant's way of reassuring the submissive they were valued and appreciated.

I think had the day intended to be 'play' the submissive would no doubt feel deflated as play suggests just that, a day of mutual enjoyment.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross
Well I can elaborate and say a lot of what you described is what happened to me on a weekend of service I had.  And yes, it was everything a service sub could have dreamed- wearing uncomfortable clothes, even being played with new toys and methods, a whole weekend just there to provide.

But from the time we left the airport together, with him knowing I'd just been on a 9 hour journey and not checking once to see if I needed food or water, till the end of the journey where he fell asleep on the couch watching a movie- it really was not fun for me.

I don't even blame him in a lot of ways- I could sincerely tell through the weekend that he MEANT things to go well and that honestly he was having a total blast.  We had been friends for a long time, we'd been talking for weeks about what to expect, and he never went against anything and in many ways was a good host.

But as awesome as he says it was for him, it really wasn't special at all.  I felt drained, sad, and unsure about the future of our friendship as I left. 

If that type of service doesn't directly make the sub "click" then there needs to be some indirect specialness to it so that the sub can still feel good about the experience.  Whether the master provides the specialness, directly or indirectly, is up to the relationship.  But if it's not there in SOME way, then it's not working.

I understand how for YOU that would seem totally awesome.  I even understand how you would have every intention of that being awesome for HIM and totally confused why it wasn't.  But the fact still remains- it didn't work for him at all.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 3:33:26 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I think perhaps the intention was conveyed to the submissive by the dominant, insofar as taking areas of play the submissive would normarily enjoy but using them in a way that would be unpleasant. People use a variety of ways to communicate, not just verbally and if I was used to enjoying certain activities only for my dominant to take those and use them in a way I would find unpleasant, I would be under no illusions that the intention was to take me out of my comfort zone.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner4SexSlave
If you ask me, sounds like the male sub/slave did not understand when he was being punished and for what specific reasons.   Sounds like a communication issue for starters, hence why there are do different versions of the story.

I have always made it a point to clearly express myself, and my reasons for doing something, what was wrong, and how the other person can correct/fix things.  

So, there appears to communication problem if you ask me.

(in reply to Owner4SexSlave)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 5:40:41 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

I doubt in the OP that the dominant was uncaring, there suggests a romantic involvement and the overall tone of the scene is that the submissive wasn't meant to enjoy their day, so that suggests a form of punishment.


Do you know the couple in the opening post?

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 7:10:23 AM   
MissMorrigan


Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
No, Julia. It was a hypothetical situation discussed between myself and a friend. I am sure, when we read the boards and hear others' experiences, that we can relate in some way and it did make me think about my own relationship with my submissive who has, on occasion, gained an entirely different perception of a situation given his mindset at the time.

When the situation suggested in the OP was put to me, my initial reaction was, "mismatched playmates", but having reread it several times I picked up on other factors such as the romantic element in their relationship, ie having feet/legs massaged, then retiring to bed, that suggests an intimate and emotional connection between them. Given that, it means they must have an established relationship and for that to happen, they must know each other pretty well, so thought that there must have been some other kind of underlying issue and that what was being seen was a 'symptom' given that we can have the same experiences but not react the same way every time due to our emotional status at the time.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 7:16:43 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
To me "feeling special" would definitely suggest that the submissive has feelings for this person that is dominating them.... I only care about the time I spend being special with special people... other wise I do not expect specialness... but that word is used in other ways too.

Edited to add:  just had the Church Lady going off in my head Well isn't that special? Ha Ha!

< Message edited by juliaoceania -- 12/2/2007 7:17:44 AM >


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 8:51:22 AM   
TethersEnd


Posts: 102
Joined: 1/29/2007
Status: offline
All this makes me wonder about where ~play~ isnt play at all and becomes ~real~ do to singular needs, in this case the Domme's.  I know for myself that I am able to to go beyond in a desire to please, but at some point recognition is necessary.  When things like this happen which they often do, it appears ~play~ left the field and became a bit too real.  

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Mismatched Playmates - 12/2/2007 9:47:03 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
The thing that really gets to me about this whole post is the denying of food and water for so many hours. It won't kill a dominant to get some water for their submissive and it doesn't have to kill the mood. Throw it in a dog bowl and let them lap it up.

If it was supposed to be punishment, I would say it failed because it doesn't sound like the submissive knew what they were punished for or why. If it was supposed to be play, I would say it failed because the dominant did not take her submissive's enjoyment into account. If it was supposed to be just for her pleasure, I would say she failed at communicating  this.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to MissMorrigan)
Profile   Post #: 35
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mismatched Playmates Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172