Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Sexy sexism


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Sexy sexism Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 5:30:41 PM   
hands0n0knees


Posts: 80
Joined: 2/19/2007
Status: offline
I don't know why, but I'm a magnate for the self-fashioned intellectual dommes.  That adjective can oscillate between sarcasm and sincerity, because some really are and some really aren't.

The intellectual nature of their offer comes in two parts: the first, which I adore, is the desire to explore a fantasy in the imagination; the second, of which I am deeply suspicious, is that they dominate from a political context, that of sexism.  Not necessarily a hatred of the male, but certainly a feeling of innate superiority is the principle of their fantasy.

Now, I consider myself to be open minded, so I am willing to play with this.  After all, isn't the history of gender one brutally stained with the submission of the female?  Isn't gender one big, historically constituted BDSM kink?  So it seems ripe for playing with.  The fact is, also, that if a male desires submission to a female, isn't the greatest mode of that a political/economic one?  There's no escape if you live in the matriarchy; there's no debate or confusion: you are communally agreed to be the sub.

The fantasy also has the advantage of being bonded tightly to the imagination.  It's impossible to change society on a sexual whim, so you can never truly live it.  If BDSM is an escape, something truly fictional, a grand narrative, works best.

And yet, I wonder if it doesn't sometimes spill uncontrolled into the realm of reality.  I got a message the other day from a correspondent of mine on here that simply read, ' Women make up 70% of accounting graduates today.  How does that make you feel, boy?'  As bored as them, I dare say.  But are there men who read the absurd mental onanism of Elise Sutton as a depiction of reality and get an erection?

I believe this was more or less touched upon in that gigantic 'male wife' thread, but I would like to expand the notion beyond just the single household.  In short, do any of you find sexism sexy?  And why, oh why?  And does it prove just how good your imagination is if you can enjoy this fantasy and still hold pretensions to liberal politics in the real world?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 5:35:00 PM   
Solipsistic


Posts: 50
Joined: 10/19/2007
Status: offline
It seems to me that sexism would be defined as superiority without consent.  Typical BDSM revolves around consent.  So my opinion would be that consent is sexy, sexism is not.

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 5:37:49 PM   
hands0n0knees


Posts: 80
Joined: 2/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Solipsistic

It seems to me that sexism would be defined as superiority without consent.  Typical BDSM revolves around consent.  So my opinion would be that consent is sexy, sexism is not.


I disagree with your definition of sexism.  Why can't a male be convinced to consent to the fact of male inferiority?  Women managed it for centuries.

(in reply to Solipsistic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 5:50:20 PM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
For those who incorporate such activities in their dynamics, more power to them.  I had a brief interlude with a black woman, where I enjoyed pushing, prodding, and probing into a well of race-based humiliation.  As I don't consider myself to be remotely superior to anyone because of my race, it's safe emotional territory for me.  Obvious her own stress at having faced racism in her upbringing, both direct and indirect, had gelled into an emotional issue where she had very high self-esteem for herself, yet still experienced social frustration.  Use of her race as one (of many) avenue to trigger her sense of humiliation was, ultimately, satisfying for her.

I believe making a fetish out of a particular aspect of self is simply one way to permit us to face issues that are complex and emotionally charged.  I think race play, male/female supremacy, and gender driven power dynamics all spring from the same well.  I don't think there's anything wrong with it, so long as it comes from a healthy emotional place.

Personally, I don't believe that my desire to own a female comes from a sexist view.  Indeed, if the woman, on the other hand, feels that women should be owned, and wants me to own her for that reason, I'd have difficulty doing so.  But if it's simply an expression of social dissatisfaction with gender roles, I'm happy to play into it; a view that is "I'm just a girl to be used an abused" enables me to tap into that emotional place inside of her.  If her view is "All women should be used and abused" I wouldn't likely be interested in playing with her, in that manner (or at all depending on how powerful a drive it is for her; that's driven by my need to be with someone who can separate dark emotions, from a misogynist/bigoted feelings towards a group as a whole.)

Regards,

Stephan


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 5:56:09 PM   
ThinkingKitten


Posts: 447
Joined: 6/15/2006
From: Ontari-ari-o
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hands0n0knees

Why can't a male be convinced to consent to the fact of male inferiority?


Um... did we take into consideration the physical differences? Maybe if man's early ancestors had adopted the policy of the females bonking the men over the head with a club (wait while I stand on a boulder to reach you huh dammit), dragging them into the cave by their hair ("Martha, this one weighs a friggin ton - can you come and give me a hand with him?") and then raping them... oh wait (looks down between legs - "Houston, we have a problem here").

Women managed it for centuries because I'd say that we tend not to be the aggressors en masse, and had little we could do when it came to being physically inferior. We've tended to work behind the scenes a lot more. You know "behind every great man...." On the mental note I see no reason why a man can't subjugate himself to a woman, and vice-versa. There has to be balance everywhere, or there's going to be trouble eventually. Go back before the advent of the three major monotheistic religions, to pagan beliefs where females were revered, and in many cases held equal to males... a better time perhaps? Isn't it just modern religious-based paternalism that's the problem?

_____________________________

Thinking Kitten

If you can't stand the heat... tell the chef to get out of the kitchen.

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 5:58:11 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
Most heterosexuals in the scene tend to find some forms of sexism very sexy, if not completely necessary and inherent to their Ds situation. 

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to ThinkingKitten)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 6:15:28 PM   
hands0n0knees


Posts: 80
Joined: 2/19/2007
Status: offline
That's an illuminating contribution, Stephan.

I am intrigued by your comfort with dysfunctional psychologies made so by politically/historically factors.  Perhaps it's because my education has stressed a 'political correctness', but I do feel a slight inclination of an eyebrow or two at the scene you depict with your black sub.  It's the same issue that I had with the domme trying to enslave me with stories of high-powered career women: it's essentially a confirmation of something repeatedly claimed to be the most ghastly distortion of truth in our history, that there are sexes/races that are inferior to others.  This isn't uncomfortable if it is entirely a fantasy; but, if you are introducing real elements of her life into her submission, in what sense is it still a game?  Of course, I appreciate that it's a game for you, as you don't really believe the things you're saying, but how for her?

I think there is a significant difference between those who have these fetishes and those with more (let's say) Freudian ones.  Having submissive tendencies after being abused as child is objectionable, but there is no factual link between those two events to guarantee their relationship.  There is no doubting the historical/political reality of sex and race as giant, sprawling factors in every element of our existence.  I'm not sure how the dommes I talk to can limit themselves to the imaginative with this particular fetish.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 6:17:40 PM   
hands0n0knees


Posts: 80
Joined: 2/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThinkingKitten

quote:

ORIGINAL: hands0n0knees

Why can't a male be convinced to consent to the fact of male inferiority?


Um... did we take into consideration the physical differences? Maybe if man's early ancestors had adopted the policy of the females bonking the men over the head with a club (wait while I stand on a boulder to reach you huh dammit), dragging them into the cave by their hair ("Martha, this one weighs a friggin ton - can you come and give me a hand with him?") and then raping them... oh wait (looks down between legs - "Houston, we have a problem here").

Women managed it for centuries because I'd say that we tend not to be the aggressors en masse, and had little we could do when it came to being physically inferior. We've tended to work behind the scenes a lot more. You know "behind every great man...." On the mental note I see no reason why a man can't subjugate himself to a woman, and vice-versa. There has to be balance everywhere, or there's going to be trouble eventually. Go back before the advent of the three major monotheistic religions, to pagan beliefs where females were revered, and in many cases held equal to males... a better time perhaps? Isn't it just modern religious-based paternalism that's the problem?


The vocabulary fits the theme, but I can't find anything in what I wrote to which this could be a reply.  Perhaps I have misunderstood.

(in reply to ThinkingKitten)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 6:45:01 PM   
MrSpectacular


Posts: 1153
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
It is an interesting paradox - trying to be dominant over someone and then  respecting their values. Maybe it is the term sexism that needs to be more defined in our current world. The word seems to be more of a throw back to the 6o's when prior to that and still somewhat there was real discrimination against women.
Is sexism sexy - not sure.
Ps - is that a sexy pose or is something else happening LOL


_____________________________

Yes I am Spectacular and they are real!

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 7:00:28 PM   
Solipsistic


Posts: 50
Joined: 10/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hands0n0knees

quote:

ORIGINAL: Solipsistic

It seems to me that sexism would be defined as superiority without consent.  Typical BDSM revolves around consent.  So my opinion would be that consent is sexy, sexism is not.


I disagree with your definition of sexism.  Why can't a male be convinced to consent to the fact of male inferiority?  Women managed it for centuries.



Women did not have a particular choice in the matter, and clearly, over time, the natural pressure is against sexism, as well as racism and plenty of other "supposed" inequalities.  If a particular person chooses to believe in their inferiority, that is their prerogative.  They are consenting to it.

The term "sexism" is used as a description of negative actions or beliefs.  If you are a male sub, you would not accuse your Domme of being sexist.  But a third party who observed her behavior might.  That's because they don't understand your consent.

Some people may find sexism sexy because it involves forcing someone into a role against their will.  That is, without consent.

< Message edited by Solipsistic -- 11/26/2007 7:09:43 PM >

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 7:10:07 PM   
ThinkingKitten


Posts: 447
Joined: 6/15/2006
From: Ontari-ari-o
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hands0n0knees

The vocabulary fits the theme, but I can't find anything in what I wrote to which this could be a reply.  Perhaps I have misunderstood.



OK, I'll give you the short answer to your question: "In short, do any of you find sexism sexy?  And why, oh why? "

I do not, because its a house of cards built on perceptions - IMO.

_____________________________

Thinking Kitten

If you can't stand the heat... tell the chef to get out of the kitchen.

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 7:22:49 PM   
ShaktiSama


Posts: 1674
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
Female Supremacy is always a larf if you want to rattle someone's cage.    In reality, mere biological sex is pretty far down the list of causes to declare someone an inferior being.  We have so many things to choose from!

(in reply to ThinkingKitten)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 7:40:56 PM   
goodgirl08


Posts: 145
Joined: 6/11/2007
Status: offline
I wonder why some think power exchange between individuals ought to fit into a wider narrative. That is disturbing to me (euphemism for it doesn't turn me on) because I think of the wider narrative siphoning into our lives on a micro level to create power exchange, not the other way around. Like Stephan said, societal dynamics and stresses can be fed into personal relationships to create something meaningful and satisfying.

But on the other hand, the wider narrative of female supremacy that you are talking about is subversive and maybe that's why these dominant women like it so much. It sounds like they're choosing not to separate it from personal relationships for a reason. I can see how it might be satisfying not just to think that women are superior, but to actually say it to the face of a man. For him to submit not only to you as a person but to that idea might be psychically satisfying because you are looking at total male submission in the flesh and blood, not just as a fantasy. I hope that makes sense.

(in reply to ThinkingKitten)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 7:51:30 PM   
TNstepsout


Posts: 1558
Joined: 8/3/2005
Status: offline
I think the deeper question here is "how do you really feel about accountants?"

(in reply to goodgirl08)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/26/2007 7:58:24 PM   
Solipsistic


Posts: 50
Joined: 10/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: goodgirl08
But on the other hand, the wider narrative of female supremacy that you are talking about is subversive and maybe that's why these dominant women like it so much. It sounds like they're choosing not to separate it from personal relationships for a reason. I can see how it might be satisfying not just to think that women are superior, but to actually say it to the face of a man. For him to submit not only to you as a person but to that idea might be psychically satisfying because you are looking at total male submission in the flesh and blood, not just as a fantasy. I hope that makes sense.


Very nicely said.  Ironically, I think the reverse is also true for some dominant men.  Having been taught throughout life to respect women and appreciate their independence, the idea of a woman willingly submitting becomes erotic.

< Message edited by Solipsistic -- 11/26/2007 8:00:43 PM >

(in reply to goodgirl08)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Sexy sexism - 11/27/2007 9:13:32 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: hands0n0knees

That's an illuminating contribution, Stephan.

I am intrigued by your comfort with dysfunctional psychologies made so by politically/historically factors.

Interesting way to put it; yeah, I suppose I am.

Perhaps it's because my education has stressed a 'political correctness', but I do feel a slight inclination of an eyebrow or two at the scene you depict with your black sub.  It's the same issue that I had with the domme trying to enslave me with stories of high-powered career women: it's essentially a confirmation of something repeatedly claimed to be the most ghastly distortion of truth in our history, that there are sexes/races that are inferior to others.  This isn't uncomfortable if it is entirely a fantasy; but, if you are introducing real elements of her life into her submission, in what sense is it still a game?  Of course, I appreciate that it's a game for you, as you don't really believe the things you're saying, but how for her?

I would suggest if someone's ultimate aim was either to damage her, or self-gratification without regard for her well-being, I'd feel the same as you do.  In fact, what I was intending was not entirely dissimilar to how I've handled a woman who had been viciously raped, and was torn between powerful rape fantasies, and a serious case of self-loathing for the incident.  I'll use the rape example, because the factors are a little more clear.

I believe there is therapeutic value in engaging in 'play rape' with a woman who has been traumatized by a rape (when it's something she's actively desiring mind you.)  I think the concept is that it allows the feelings of guilt, humiliation, and shame to be expressed in a safe environment; certainly her original attacker didn't hang around for her to have a bonding moment to discuss how she felt about the event.  It allows her to do the struggling that she couldn't do then for fear of her life, and to become empowered by the opportunity to look the beast in the eye, and say "I lived through this, and I am stronger than you are."  This may seem a bit like using poison as an antidote, but I know that when I've engaged in such activities, much of the play rape fantasies have subsided and the issue no longer seemed to haunt her.  I know in her case, she continued to enjoy rough sex as a submissive, but I think part of the value was she no longer felt threatened or ashamed of that incident.

As this applies to race dynamics, is that it allows for the expression of rage, frustration, and humiliation that is rarely possible when racism is expressed. 
I've been denied service at shops because I was white, when living in Chile, yet hardly to the degree of racism that I suspect many others have faced.  A black client denied service at a restaurant (for example) isn't always in a position to vent that anger and rage at the manager.  These little things, taken individually, are a drop in the bucket.  It's the collective, day to day experiences that build up over time that I think gels into racial angst; expressing it through a fetish type activity, I think, serves as a release valve for that pressure, and allows the person involved to face it in a safe, controlled situation.  The humiliation is released, and the person is better able to embrace themselves better.

I think this can be retroactive too; some white men express this in erotic literature through cuckholding fantasies, often with their pretty white wives being made into willing sex slaves for bigger, stronger black men.  It's a double shot; the average middle-aged white man with a decent job and beautiful wife feels like he's repressing not only his wife (and her entire sex) by forcing her into sexually inhibited and unsatisfying relationship, but also being aware that he feels responsible for repressing blacks as a whole (or, on the flip side, seeing the black lover as the ultimate symbol of his degradation; there's obviously more than a few psychological factors that could motivate someone.)  How's that for finding sexism sexy?

I think there is a significant difference between those who have these fetishes and those with more (let's say) Freudian ones.  Having submissive tendencies after being abused as child is objectionable, but there is no factual link between those two events to guarantee their relationship. 

I disagree.  Our dominant or submissive orientation stems from somewhere (nature vs/ nurture argument; I embrace both views myself.)  That it stems from an unhealthy or abusive childhood doesn't necessarily mean expressing and embracing submission (or dominance) as an adult must be unhealthy, unhappy, or objectionable.  It is safe to say there's no hard evidence either way in this field, and our entire conversation is little better than armchair psychology in the first place

There is no doubting the historical/political reality of sex and race as giant, sprawling factors in every element of our existence.  I'm not sure how the dommes I talk to can limit themselves to the imaginative with this particular fetish.

Nothing imaginary about it; some people will feel compelled for it, some people won't.  I'm sure sex with mailboxes derives from some specific psychological conditioning of some sort.  Looking at the system as a whole will demonstrate trends, yet looking at individuals with a system show the complexities of different factors make it impossible (at least right now with our limited understanding of psychology and brain chemistry) to understand how those systems really do impact us. 

Regards,

Stephan



_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to hands0n0knees)
Profile   Post #: 16
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Sexy sexism Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078