RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


popeye1250 -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 9:56:29 AM)

Senator Abbadabba wants to raise taxes? No!
Both sides need to start working on the other side of the fence.
CUT SPENDING!
We shouldn't be spending more than we're taking in.
There is plenty of places in this lardened government to make cuts.
Mitt Romney's commercial said he'd audit the federal govt from top to bottom. That's what we need, a businessman in there to start cutting.




SimplyMichael -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 9:58:29 AM)

Like the businessmen who ran Enron, or the CEO of Tyson?  Everyone in the Whitehouse have been "businessmen"...

We need competence and it can be found in many places...




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 10:09:40 AM)

Here are some interesting figures and charts http://www.die.net/musings/national_debt/


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

'You do realize a huge amount of debt that our children will bear comes from the left.......'

cite that please, because everything I have cited and found shows the opposite is true. 





Level -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 10:23:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Okay, I'm going to go support the economy at the local chinese buffet....... be back soon.


LOL- cash or charge?


lol, cash [8|]




popeye1250 -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 10:26:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Like the businessmen who ran Enron, or the CEO of Tyson?  Everyone in the Whitehouse have been "businessmen"...

We need competence and it can be found in many places...


Michael, yeah, you're right.
We'd be MUCH better off with a crooked lawyer.




mnottertail -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 10:26:45 AM)

Like Nixon?




popeye1250 -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 10:32:48 AM)

Ron, I won't vote for anyone who went to "YALE" or any lawyers.




pahunkboy -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 10:52:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

Okay, I'm going to go support the economy at the local chinese buffet....... be back soon.


LOL- cash or charge?


lol, cash [8|]


I love Chinese food! 




Archer -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 1:08:42 PM)

Real big problem with raising the Social Security Taxes.
Congress by law moves any excess payments above the current outlay of benifits over into the general fund and then spends it. Raise the tax now and it will simply be spent since tere is no actual account/lockbox/ storage of those funds.
It'll just end up as more debt we owe to the social security fiund from the general fund.

Unless and until they stop the mandartory purchase of US Treasury bonds with the excess money and using it to fund general operating expences I cant even start to support the idea of raising the social security taxes.

If as he said Obama really thought he should have paid more there was nothing stopping him from writting a check for the amount he thought was "his fair share" and sending it to the social security administration.
Since the headline didn't say he had done that it's all just rabble rousing class warfare empty feel good crap.




subfever -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 1:57:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Mitt Romney's commercial said he'd audit the federal govt from top to bottom. That's what we need, a businessman in there to start cutting.


Do you really think so?

I think we need someone who tells the truth, and then endeavors to level the playing field.




subfever -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 2:02:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer

...it's all just rabble rousing class warfare empty feel good crap.


Indeed it is... just like much of what we hear along the campaign trail.




popeye1250 -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 2:07:01 PM)

Archer, you are correct!
There is no lock box for SS so it would just be spent.
I wonder if Abbadabba know's that?




stef -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 2:07:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

I think we need someone who tells the truth, and then endeavors to level the playing field.

Come on now.  I'm sure that Mitt got all of that fibbing out of his system when he was governor of MA.  [;)]

~stef




pinksugarsub -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 5:46:07 PM)

What Obama is suggesting affects only those earning at or above the social security wage tax  limit.  Last i knew it was set at approximately $75,000 yearly.
 
There is a pension planning technique that allows an employer to 'contribute' to a pension plan at the social security tax rate, except that wages subject to tax are exempt from consideration when deciding how much to contribute for each employee.  The result is fat pensions for high wage earners and little or no pensions for lower wage earners (within some limits).
 
The social security tax is currently laid heaviest on those earning the least.  Because it is a flat rate without adjustments, a low wage earner loses a higher percent of income to this tax than a high wage earner. 
 
Generally i oppose the imposition of new or higher taxes, but this idea has merit in my opinion.
 
pinksugarsub




MissLucrecia -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 6:05:21 PM)

Actually the social security wage base is a little over 90k as it is.  Soon there will be no limit as every year the wage base goes up about $3000.00 at minimum.  The limit on Medicare tax (1.45%) used to be 145k back in the early 90's.  Truely as it stands the rich folk are already paying the bulk of the social security and their employers are matching it.  For those of you that don't know, FICA is broken down to social security at 6.2% of taxable gross and medicare is 1.45% which give us the 7.65% we've all been subjected to since our first jobs.

Here is another train of thought:  How long will small businesses stay in business if their employer taxes continue to raise?  What will that do to our cost of living? If employer costs rise too high, they are forced to raise their prices, CUT JOBS, or go out of business. 

Now I don't know but it seems to me that if an employer has to cut jobs due to increasing taxes, doesn't that lower the taxable wages he is responsible for and therefore lowers the amount of tax actually given to the government? 

It's quite headspinning, we could go round and round but the truth is, the more we allow the government to have our money, the more they control our lives and impose THEIR values on us.  Liberal society isn't really liberal at all.  I say no more taxes.  I don't care if some politician's  girlfriend has to drive a Hundai instead of a Jaguar!  Put her butt on the freakin' buss!  Better yet, make her walk!




Real0ne -> RE: Obama supports higher Social Security tax (11/12/2007 6:11:57 PM)



ZZZzzzzz

Nothing new...  

Democrat = corporate welfare (+a little extra for the people)

republican = corporate welfare and higher prices

ron paul = fiscal responsibility






Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625