|
DiurnalVampire -> RE: Identifying bad Masters (11/13/2007 8:22:35 AM)
|
My boys are not tested, ecasue tey have never given me a reason to. They follow orders when I give them. I am intelligent enough to KNOW they will, and see no reason ot flex my musces and give them questionable tests.
And when theymisbehave, there are observable consequences. There is no putting off punishment, and there is no sliding by and questioning whether or not I am going to do anything. You are right, we pick our slaves as much as the slave picks the master. And if you have been lucky enough never to have made a poor decision and found out down the line that you were abad fit when initially you thought you were a good one, then more power to you. *I* have not always been that lucky.
Presumption, yes, from the WOMEN, not the girls. Unless, of course, you like being refered to as boy. I can do that, no problem. If you dont like how someone speaks to you, then rather than insult them, just ignore them.
The Master in the OPs post was not enforcing the training, and so the OP did not feel as if the control was real. That does happen. That doesnt mean she is less of a slave for wanting actual enforcement of rules and punishment, does it? The way you do things, you would rather tell someone tehy are a bad slave and use their own guilt to make them behave rather than do something active to assert yourself? Passivity does not make for a good dominant when it is ALL that is used. You want someone to be loyal to you becasue they desire to be loyal to you, not becasue they feel bad about not being loyal. Big difference. Id rather release someone who was obeying out of a sense of guilt for not listening rather than an actual desire to obey.
Maybe thats just me, though.
DV
|
|
|
|
