pahunkboy
Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006 From: Central Pennsylvania Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RealityLicks "Shortly after Joaquim Chissano became president of Mozambique, (many) suggested that he faced "a combination of problems to tax the ingenuity of the most brilliant of leaders". That was true and though Mr Chissano may now be more feted abroad than at home, where some remember whispers of corruption and his initial eight years as the leader of a one-party Marxist state, his record unquestionably stands as a rebuke to those who assume that the story of African states is always one of decline. In 1986, when he stepped into the shoes of Samora Machel, after Mozambique's first leader was killed in a mysterious plane crash, his country was in economic collapse, its people tormented by a violent South African-backed insurgency. When he left office, voluntarily, 19 years later, after winning two free elections and deciding not to stand in a third, Mozambique was stable, a democracy slowly climbing out of poverty. That in itself justifies yesterday's decision to award Mr Chissano a $5m prize for good governance. There is something quixotic about the whole competition, established and funded by the Sudanese businessman Mo Ibrahim in order to offer Africa's best leaders a comfortable retirement, in the hope that it will lure them away from sustained rule and corruption." Media report, Oct 22nd 2007 LE, I don't know you and it maybe unintentional on your part but there is a sad and nasty undercurrent to your post. You seem to assume that the report from Kenya is true and accurate, when really it could well be another media scare story or exaggeration. Worse than that, you argue that it applies across the whole of a continent of hundreds of millions of people exactly like you and me, without any apparent awareness of the error you are making. Italy is often slated as a highly corrupt country, does that justify viewing the any and all European countries; the Dutch, the Irish or whoever in the same way? If not, please give me the reasons you do so with all African countries. Was there a documentary on each of them last night? I really don't have the time or inclination to counter all the spurious and ephemeric claims in your post, they really are the kind of thing even the tabloids can't get away with any more. However, since you echo an admiration for Bob Geldof (which I'd qualify severely by the way) why do you think that with his numerous visits to the region and long involvement with same that he is so blind to factors you can deduce from 50 minutes of TV? I do not claim to be an expert on international development but before making sweeping genearalisations which write off the integrity of a whole continent, I'd expect to do a little bit more research than watching one TV programme. And having read some of your previous posts, I'm disappointed you show such little endaevour to uncover the truth in this instance. I thought this board aspired for higher than the level of pub talk. Please prove me right. 50 minutes is a lifetime. typically 7 minutes- with 2 on average is what the US sees/ Channel 4 is more in dept then say cnn, fox. even pbs lately. I love your posting depth! Welcome to casual banter!!!!!! :-D
|