RE: FBI: Calif. fires are the work of an arsonist (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Real0ne -> RE: FBI: Calif. fires are the work of an arsonist (10/25/2007 11:59:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

      C'mon, Real.  Tell me you've never been to a demolition derby...


Hey now that brings back memories, not in many years lol




luckydog1 -> RE: FBI: Calif. fires are the work of an arsonist (10/26/2007 1:12:31 AM)

I disagree Real.  Once there is a pursuit and the car is used as weopon, the police should nuetralize him.  It is no different than if he pulled a gun out when cornered, doesn't matter if he shoots it or not.  The officer should properly shoot  him, and shoot to kill.  If this guy started a fire that is killing people, he is a very dangerous wanted criminal.  If he isn't he had no reason to flee and assualt an officer with a weopon.  Oviously backing into a police car while parking is a very different type of scenario.  Using a weopon against a officer is a get shot offense.

"Lookie what we have buried in this article!   Shoot first ask questions later! "  That is what you claim, yet the police did approach him to ask questions first.  And only shot after he fled, and used a weopon against them.  This is a great example of how you twist things.  Also they were state police, which you claim to be supportive of right?  Constitutionalist and all?

Are you actually asserting the right to flee and use a weopon against police when questioned in the act of breaking the law?  Thats what Ron Paul is going to bring us?




Real0ne -> RE: FBI: Calif. fires are the work of an arsonist (10/26/2007 2:54:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

I disagree Real.  Once there is a pursuit and the car is used as weopon,

the police should nuetralize him.  It is no different than if he pulled a gun out when cornered, doesn't matter if he shoots it or not.  The officer should properly shoot  him, and shoot to kill.  If this guy started a fire that is killing people, he is a very dangerous wanted criminal.  If he isn't he had no reason to flee and assualt an officer with a weopon.  Oviously backing into a police car while parking is a very different type of scenario.  Using a weopon against a officer is a get shot offense.

"Lookie what we have buried in this article!   Shoot first ask questions later! "  That is what you claim, yet the police did approach him to ask questions first.  And only shot after he fled, and used a weopon against them.  This is a great example of how you twist things.  Also they were state police, which you claim to be supportive of right?  Constitutionalist and all?

Are you actually asserting the right to flee and use a weopon against police when questioned in the act of breaking the law?  Thats what Ron Paul is going to bring us?


I stopped reading your bait and switch blathering right there.

I dont think all the posters on this board combined can READ INTO OR READ OUT OF an article and get it as convoluted as you can .  You certainly deserve a high achievement award for totally  bastardizing and annihilating the most simple 3rd grade grammar.


quote:


By JEREMIAH MARQUEZ
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Federal agents joined the search for evidence Wednesday in brush-covered Orange County hills where an arsonist is believed to have ignited one of the wildfires devastating Southern California.

In San Bernardino County, a man suspected of starting a small fire was arrested and another man was shot to death by police after he fled officers who approached to see if he might be trying to set a fire.

Wildfires, burning in seven counties, had destroyed about 1,500 homes and caused more than a half-million people to flee since the first blaze began late Saturday. At least two - in Orange and Riverside counties - have been linked to arson.

Throughout the region, authorities stepped up patrols in hopes of preventing copycat fires and looting. In San Diego County, sheriff's officials have reported scattered instances of looting in fire zones. Two people have been arrested.

Orange County officials converged on a remote area of bone-dry brush where a 19,200-acre wildfire has destroyed nine homes. They were aided by special teams from the FBI and federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The federal government planned to send more agents from around the country to help with the probe.

Investigators taped off an area they called a crime scene, took photos, collected evidence and recorded map coordinates, according to ATF Special Agent Susan Raichel. Authorities believe the fire had been set because they found three different ignition points within a short distance - a common sign of arson.

A $70,000 reward was offered for information leading to an arrest in the case.

In San Bernardino County, a motorcyclist who authorities say set a small fire in a rural foothill area of the San Bernardino Mountains has been booked for investigation of arson. Authorities said they didn't know if the man was connected to any of the 16 major wildfires burning in Southern California.

In the city of San Bernardino, police shot and killed a man who fled when officers approached to see if he might be trying to set a fire.

The man, whose name was not released, was shot Tuesday night following a chase that ended when he backed his car into a police cruiser and an officer opened fire, San Bernardino police said.



Maybe if you beg nicely some nice bleeding heart soul out here will be kind enough to explain to you the difference between what you blathered and what the article actually says.  Meanwhile the rest of us are laughing our asses off at you!

PLONK!






luckydog1 -> RE: FBI: Calif. fires are the work of an arsonist (10/26/2007 8:55:03 AM)

If you think so real, feel free to pretend ....




bigjohnson -> RE: FBI: Calif. fires are the work of an arsonist (10/26/2007 2:16:41 PM)

Everyone here is way too liberal. You guys take a bit of information and manipulate it to say what you want it to say. Don't try and read between the lines and you might actually get information out of this article. They started fires, they will get in trouble, they tried to run, they got caught. Simple people, very simple. It is just a shame that it has to happen in the beloved Malibu. The thing that everyone should really be wondering is why when less wealthy neighborhoods get evacuated from wildfires why we don't have press coverage 24/7. This summer we got to see this first hand 3000 people get evacuated from a poor neighborhood and not a single new reporter showed up to interview them to see what they were losing and where they were going to go. Granted these fires are on a much larger scale but the brunt of the press coverage has been covering the areas with million dollar homes.





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125