The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:01:56 PM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

Does it not bother anyone else, all the improper things done by the Clintons, during their campaigns? Just google Hillary Campaign Fraud or Hillary Campaign Funds. Follow the money and where does it lead? We really need a selection for "None of the above" on ballots. Force the damn parties to put someone up that is less corrupted than the field we see now.

Orion

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

Post #: 1

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:25:08 PM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Maybe the Democrats are just desperate to find a way to lose again, exactly like last time. Think of it - they lost to George Bush.

And just when I thought they couldn't possibly nominate anyone worse than Kerry... here comes Hillary.

You can't write this kind of comedy!

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 2

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:30:45 PM

servantforuse

Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline

The anti American, hate Bush liberals on collarme never want to take care of their own back yard. They don't care what the Clintons did in the past or ( God forbid ) what will happen if these socialists ever get in the White House again. Chain down the furniture would be the first order of business. They tried to steal it when they left the last time.....

(in reply to Sanity)

Post #: 3

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:37:44 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

yawn...

send in the clowns,... where are the clowns....

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/19/2007 8:39:09 PM >

(in reply to servantforuse)

Post #: 4

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:44:39 PM

Nosathro

Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

In fact the Hillary Clinton Campain Fundraising has been out of the news and many do blame the liberal media. Hsu aka "Clintons ATM" may have through fraud bankrolled her campain and maybe still doing it. Hillary on the other remains silent.

_____________________________

"The love of a slave girl is the deepest and most profound love that any woman can give a man. Love makes a woman a man's slave, and the wholeness of that love requires that she be, in truth, his slave." Magicians of Gor, page 31

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 5

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:50:00 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

Honestly who cares about a few tens of thousands in fraud by the democrats? The Bush family has been financed to the tune of hundreds of MILLIONS by the Saudis. The wannabe theocrats have raised more millions to support anti Constitutional GOP candidates, Rick Santorum, GWB, Jim Inhofe etc. And let us not forget the attempted coup by Gingrich and pals.

You let me know when Democratic malfeasance reaches those levels and I'll start caring. Until then either clean up your house or STFU.

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 6

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 8:51:22 PM

subfever

Posts: 2895
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline

Still another reason to vote for Ron Paul.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 7

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 9:00:53 PM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

My house is clean. Wrong is wrong, and those doing wrong should be held accountable, regardless of which party is doing it. What you are supporting is hypocricy.

You can take STFU and STUF.

Orion

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Honestly who cares about a few tens of thousands in fraud by the democrats? The Bush family has been financed to the tune of hundreds of MILLIONS by the Saudis. The wannabe theocrats have raised more millions to support anti Constitutional GOP candidates, Rick Santorum, GWB, Jim Inhofe etc. And let us not forget the attempted coup by Gingrich and pals.

You let me know when Democratic malfeasance reaches those levels and I'll start caring. Until then either clean up your house or STFU.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to DomKen)

Post #: 8

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 9:03:11 PM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

Also, the amounts are in the millions if you combine from her's and her husbands campaigns. There was that multi million dollar gala event that has alot of questions around it.

Orion

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 9

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 9:32:50 PM

awmslave

Posts: 599
Joined: 3/31/2006
Status: offline

Who are the fools donating for Clintons campaign? She has no chance of winning the presidential election. No sane person would vote for H. Clinton. She has never led anything (a car perhaps occasionally). Presidential candidate needs at least some kind of record. Historically every president (J.Kennedy was an exception perhaps) had impressive record of achievements. Even hated by many G. W. Bush was a sucessful baseball team manager and popular governor of important state Texas before the presidency.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 10

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 9:45:12 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Honestly who cares about a few tens of thousands in fraud by the democrats? The Bush family has been financed to the tune of hundreds of MILLIONS by the Saudis. The wannabe theocrats have raised more millions to support anti Constitutional GOP candidates, Rick Santorum, GWB, Jim Inhofe etc. And let us not forget the attempted coup by Gingrich and pals.

You let me know when Democratic malfeasance reaches those levels and I'll start caring. Until then either clean up your house or STFU.

It`s also a difference of quality,and quantity.

Google:

Rep.Randy "Duke" Cunningham (Ca)

Rep. Jerry Lewis (Ca)

Rep.Roy Blunt (Missory)

Rep. Tom DeLay (Texas)

Jack Abramoff

Rep. Bob Nay (Ohio)

Sen. Ted Stevens, (Alaska)

Rep. John Doolittle (CA)

Reps. Duncan Hunter (CA)

Gov. Bob Taft (Ohio)

and add the word "scandal"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rep. Heather Wilson (NM)http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Congresswoman_on_page_board_buried_file_1019.html

Rep David Vitter (LA)
[ Of course ,you can`t talk about Vitter`s whoring,w/out getting into the Wash.DC prostitute scandal.]

Here`s the "DC Madam" on Fox News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mz5tjfZi6g

and speaking of hooker scandals,this one goes straight to the WH.

Jeff Gannon, male hooker/white house plant/fake-press person.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27730-2005Feb15.html

Image results for Jeff gannon

http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/secret_service_gannon_424.htm

I thought bush was going to restore honor and integrety in the WH?

What happened to that pledge?

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/19/2007 10:19:10 PM >

(in reply to DomKen)

Post #: 11

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 9:52:46 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: awmslave

Who are the fools donating for Clintons campaign? She has no chance of winning the presidential election. No sane person would vote for H. Clinton. She has never led anything (a car perhaps occasionally). Presidential candidate needs at least some kind of record. Historically every president (J.Kennedy was an exception perhaps) had impressive record of achievements. Even hated by many G. W. Bush was a sucessful baseball team manager and popular governor of important state Texas before the presidency.

Even hated by many G. W. Bush was a sucessful baseball team manager and popular governor of important state Texas before the presidency.

ROTFLMFAO!!!

To much cool-aid,changes your body...

bush ran that team into the ground and ruined two other businesses.

As a businessman,he was a complete failure.

Thanks for the belly laugh.It was good.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/19/2007 9:54:01 PM >

(in reply to awmslave)

Post #: 12

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 10:19:43 PM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

So when a question is asked about a corrupt poltician, you show other corrupt politicians as an excuse for Hillary?

This is a discussion about Hillary. How does Bush's corruption make Hillary's corruption okay?

Is that the only defense for her?

Orion

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Honestly who cares about a few tens of thousands in fraud by the democrats? The Bush family has been financed to the tune of hundreds of MILLIONS by the Saudis. The wannabe theocrats have raised more millions to support anti Constitutional GOP candidates, Rick Santorum, GWB, Jim Inhofe etc. And let us not forget the attempted coup by Gingrich and pals.

You let me know when Democratic malfeasance reaches those levels and I'll start caring. Until then either clean up your house or STFU.

It`s also a difference of quality,and also quantity.

Google:

Rep.Randy "Duke" Cunningham (Ca)

Rep. Jerry Lewis (Ca)

Rep.Roy Blunt (Missory)

Rep. Tom DeLay (Texas)

Jack Abramoff

Rep. Bob Nay (Ohio)

Sen. Ted Stevens, (Alaska)

Rep. John Doolittle (CA)

Reps. Duncan Hunter (CA)

Gov. Bob Taft (Ohio)

and add the word "scandal"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rep. Heather Wilson (NM)http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Congresswoman_on_page_board_buried_file_1019.html

Rep David Vitter (LA)
[ Of course ,you can`t talk about Vitter`s whoring,w/out getting into the Wash.DC prostitute scandal.]

Here`s the "DC Madam" on Fox News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mz5tjfZi6g

and speaking of hooker scandals,this one goes straight to the WH.

Jeff Gannon, male hooker/white house plant/fake-press person.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27730-2005Feb15.html

Image results for Jeff gannon

http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/secret_service_gannon_424.htm

I thought bush was going to restore honor and integrety in the WH?

What happened to that pledge?

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 13

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 10:25:03 PM

trappedinamuseum

Posts: 5066
Joined: 8/24/2006
Status: offline

I don't speak for him, but perhaps the thought was that since most (not all) politicians are corrupt in some way, so perhaps Hillary's corruptness is not all that bad.

Lesser of two evils I suppose.

_____________________________

"You're gonna catch a cold, from the ice inside you soul.
Don't come back for me.
Don't come back at all" - Jar of Hearts

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 14

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 11:12:46 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

So when a question is asked about a corrupt poltician, you show other corrupt politicians as an excuse for Hillary?

This is a discussion about Hillary. How does Bush's corruption make Hillary's corruption okay?

Is that the only defense for her?

Orion

I think it's usually called pointing out your hypocrisy. Where are the threads started by you about the much larger campaign fund raising irregularities of the GOP? Where are the threads railing against the GOP Congressional leadership of the last Congress all effectively selling their offices to Abramoff? Where was your outrage when the documentation that Jeb Bush illegally had legal voters purged from the Florida voter rolls became public?

I'mn tired of taking the high road while the GOP's sycophants throw crap hoping something, anything, will stick. Show me anything the Dems have done worse the Carl Rove's various and sundry antics and I'll be the first to concemn it but I keep a close eye on that stuff and nothing I've ever heard off rises to the level of funding an old Nixon hatchetman's lies against a decorated veteran about his military record. In any sort of rational nation the GOP's supporters would have simply refused to vote for anyone associated with that barbarity but the supposed party of morality is really the party of big money and win at any cost.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 15

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/19/2007 11:19:09 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

So when a question is asked about a corrupt poltician, you show other corrupt politicians as an excuse for Hillary?

This is a discussion about Hillary. How does Bush's corruption make Hillary's corruption okay?

Is that the only defense for her?

Orion

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Honestly who cares about a few tens of thousands in fraud by the democrats? The Bush family has been financed to the tune of hundreds of MILLIONS by the Saudis. The wannabe theocrats have raised more millions to support anti Constitutional GOP candidates, Rick Santorum, GWB, Jim Inhofe etc. And let us not forget the attempted coup by Gingrich and pals.

You let me know when Democratic malfeasance reaches those levels and I'll start caring. Until then either clean up your house or STFU.

No, Hillary`s just trying to catch up w/ the republicans.

It`ll take a couple life times, though.

Seriously,she hasn`t been charged a crime,or done anything illegal.I thought you guys were all about inocent, until proven guilty.

What`s up guys,slow news cycle,or something ?

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 10/19/2007 11:20:06 PM >

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)

Post #: 16

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/20/2007 12:18:38 AM

awmslave

Posts: 599
Joined: 3/31/2006
Status: offline

quote:

Even hated by many G. W. Bush was a sucessful baseball team manager and popular governor of important state Texas before the presidency.

ROTFLMFAO!!!

To much cool-aid,changes your body...

bush ran that team into the ground and ruined two other businesses.

As a businessman,he was a complete failure.

Thanks for the belly laugh.It was good.

My question was what has Mrs. Clinton done useful besides voting strictly party line in US Senate? Help me out. My knowlege of US history is not perfect.
Bush at least did something before becoming the president. If one is in love with word "democrat" why not to vote for John Edwards. He made hundreds of millions sucessfully suing medical doctors. Obviously he has great skills with finances. Maybe he will reduce US debt. Looking from the other country, US would be much better off with independent president (too bad the US election system is unfair). Pushing somebody who in her arrogant mind imagines she can do the job is unneccessary and not very smart.

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 17

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/20/2007 2:36:31 AM

came4U

Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline

I'm votin' for Hillary. I am a big Clinton fan, voted for him and will vote for her.

(in reply to awmslave)

Post #: 18

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/20/2007 4:51:47 AM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

I was researching all of the candidates, and capaign impropreties came up under Hillary. Just in case you have not read it before, and to make it easy for you, I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN. Taking the high road? You mean doing the right thing? Well if that is your take on it, then you are just as bad. Politicians and people that think like you are a big problem in this country.

BTW, I was talking about and outraged at the items you list, so your BS does not float.

Sickening.

Orion

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

So when a question is asked about a corrupt poltician, you show other corrupt politicians as an excuse for Hillary?

This is a discussion about Hillary. How does Bush's corruption make Hillary's corruption okay?

Is that the only defense for her?

Orion

I think it's usually called pointing out your hypocrisy. Where are the threads started by you about the much larger campaign fund raising irregularities of the GOP? Where are the threads railing against the GOP Congressional leadership of the last Congress all effectively selling their offices to Abramoff? Where was your outrage when the documentation that Jeb Bush illegally had legal voters purged from the Florida voter rolls became public?

I'mn tired of taking the high road while the GOP's sycophants throw crap hoping something, anything, will stick. Show me anything the Dems have done worse the Carl Rove's various and sundry antics and I'll be the first to concemn it but I keep a close eye on that stuff and nothing I've ever heard off rises to the level of funding an old Nixon hatchetman's lies against a decorated veteran about his military record. In any sort of rational nation the GOP's supporters would have simply refused to vote for anyone associated with that barbarity but the supposed party of morality is really the party of big money and win at any cost.

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to DomKen)

Post #: 19

RE: The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud - 10/20/2007 4:54:38 AM

OrionTheWolf

Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline

You guys? Oh, you are pulling a Rush on me, and since I question a Democrat, I must be a Republican? Same old tired song and dance. One of the nice things about being an Independent, I vote for the person and not the party, I call bullshit on both parties, and I don't shake pom poms like the party cheerleaders.

I thought you were screaming about justice in so many threads, didn't know that what you actually meant was hypocricy.

Orion

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

So when a question is asked about a corrupt poltician, you show other corrupt politicians as an excuse for Hillary?

This is a discussion about Hillary. How does Bush's corruption make Hillary's corruption okay?

Is that the only defense for her?

Orion

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Honestly who cares about a few tens of thousands in fraud by the democrats? The Bush family has been financed to the tune of hundreds of MILLIONS by the Saudis. The wannabe theocrats have raised more millions to support anti Constitutional GOP candidates, Rick Santorum, GWB, Jim Inhofe etc. And let us not forget the attempted coup by Gingrich and pals.

You let me know when Democratic malfeasance reaches those levels and I'll start caring. Until then either clean up your house or STFU.

No, Hillary`s just trying to catch up w/ the republicans.

It`ll take a couple life times, though.

Seriously,she hasn`t been charged a crime,or done anything illegal.I thought you guys were all about inocent, until proven guilty.

What`s up guys,slow news cycle,or something ?

_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 20

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> The Clintons and questions of campaign funds/fraud

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.094