quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

I would give you full faith and credit without a link, given your unhealthy obsession with Bush, which seems like a borderline case of  passionate infatuation. Seriously, Every time I open this forum and see the word "Bush" I don't even have to look to know who is on one of his usual rants. Virtually EVERY topic written is some rant about Bush. It's not even some critical discussion about a belief of his miscalculations or an issue presented. It is just plain old "Fuck Bush!!! and anybody who says otherwise is a NEOCON!"

It's old.

It's boring

This obsession speaks volumes about personal priorities and free time.

Nobody cares.

Newsflash... he isn't a very popular president.Yeah, we got that. You don't like Bush... yeah, we got that, like 256 posts ago. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if you have more posts on the site complaining about his scandals than the number of scandals he was involved in! So here you go... FUCK BUSH, BUSH SUCKS, Anybody who says different is a NEOCON and an idiot. I am a NEOCON because it took me more than one paragraph to say "fuck Bush" blah blah blah blah Wahhhhh Waaaahhhh Waaaaaahhhhhhh!


If there was a more constructive way to say this from the point of view of the issue I would, instead of stepping on the "personal line" (so mods or disapproving readers, I apologize if I colored outside of the lines). But the fact is that the last time that I mentioned this constructively in another Bush-Bashing hate rant of a thread, (without any question about "coloring outside of the lines) our esteemed author resumed his "NEOCON" tirade against me and anybody who didn't scream FUCK BUSH and his topic got locked.  

If a member wishes to portray himself in a certain way by revealing his unhealthy obsession with a public figure by making multiple threads in a week over the same old shit, then that is the author's business. But when there is no issue up for discussion, or when there is an issue but the author responds with nothing more than "typical NEOCON response" and other mindless insults (which has caused aformentioned thread locking in the past), it serves no purpose here other than wasting bandwidth and trolling in the community. That's my .02, at least. Feel free to lob the same old insults if it makes you feel better.But it's really time to either put your resentment and closet infatuation behind you (maybe with a cute little "Fuck Bush" style sig line, or embrace the dark obsession in a CONSTRUCTIVE manner by actually presenting issues for discussion, and when you hear something you don't like, make an argument against the post instead of the same troll/rant that unravels ito an insult fest when somebody writes something that doesn't slavishly agree with your sentiments.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

My understanding if you just count the number of criminal convictions and prison terms of people working for a President during his term, it would appear Bill Clinton Adminstration was the most corrupt one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

I would give you full faith and credit without a link, given your unhealthy obsession with Bush, which seems like a borderline case of  passionate infatuation. Seriously, Every time I open this forum and see the word "Bush" I don't even have to look to know who is on one of his usual rants. Virtually EVERY topic written is some rant about Bush. It's not even some critical discussion about a belief of his miscalculations or an issue presented. It is just plain old "Fuck Bush!!! and anybody who says otherwise is a NEOCON!"

It's old.

It's boring

This obsession speaks volumes about personal priorities and free time.

Nobody cares.

Newsflash... he isn't a very popular president.Yeah, we got that. You don't like Bush... yeah, we got that, like 256 posts ago. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if you have more posts on the site complaining about his scandals than the number of scandals he was involved in! So here you go... FUCK BUSH, BUSH SUCKS, Anybody who says different is a NEOCON and an idiot. I am a NEOCON because it took me more than one paragraph to say "fuck Bush" blah blah blah blah Wahhhhh Waaaahhhh Waaaaaahhhhhhh!


If there was a more constructive way to say this from the point of view of the issue I would, instead of stepping on the "personal line" (so mods or disapproving readers, I apologize if I colored outside of the lines). But the fact is that the last time that I mentioned this constructively in another Bush-Bashing hate rant of a thread, (without any question about "coloring outside of the lines) our esteemed author resumed his "NEOCON" tirade against me and anybody who didn't scream FUCK BUSH and his topic got locked.  

If a member wishes to portray himself in a certain way by revealing his unhealthy obsession with a public figure by making multiple threads in a week over the same old shit, then that is the author's business. But when there is no issue up for discussion, or when there is an issue but the author responds with nothing more than "typical NEOCON response" and other mindless insults (which has caused aformentioned thread locking in the past), it serves no purpose here other than wasting bandwidth and trolling in the community. That's my .02, at least. Feel free to lob the same old insults if it makes you feel better.But it's really time to either put your resentment and closet infatuation behind you (maybe with a cute little "Fuck Bush" style sig line, or embrace the dark obsession in a CONSTRUCTIVE manner by actually presenting issues for discussion, and when you hear something you don't like, make an argument against the post instead of the same troll/rant that unravels ito an insult fest when somebody writes something that doesn't slavishly agree with your sentiments.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

My understanding if you just count the number of criminal convictions and prison terms of people working for a President during his term, it would appear Bill Clinton Adminstration was the most corrupt one.