OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
1) I am not a republican, though my views lean conservative and not socialistic. Claiming I am republican, just because I disagree with your views, is very similar to what you claimed a talk show host did to a caller and then called it hypocricy. I suppose you were correct. 2) I will not worry about your politican views when you keep them private. Once you make them public, I will now comment on them. 3) Yeah I know the bill was bi-partisan, but that does not meant that everyone of each party agreed with it. I suppose those that did not agree with it, should shut up? Now some more facts. Bi-partison means 3 of the 12 sponsors were republican. The republican party has admitted that by not passing this bill, it may cost them elections in 2008, because the general public may not understand the particulars. marketing research has shown that using the words "child" and "children" spark an automatic response in most people to sympathize whatever those words are associated with. Don't worry, when I see Non-Cons do similar things, I tend to call them on it as well, so consider me an equal opportunity asshole. If you ever listen to the Boortz show, I am one of those callers that has called him on things, agreed with him on others, and even been hung up on because what I said provoked him so much. I am not a 'Yes Man" for any political party. Now then for any that wish to research this bill can do so at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-2073 Orion quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf How do you spell selective information? Have you read the bill and how it would implement, who would get assistance faster than others and things that were tagged onto it? You are pretty fanatically left. Do you care about resolving things, or standing to the far left and name calling? Orion Yeah,..I know.It`s tough being a republican these days. Suck it in,and deal.... BTW,it was a "bi-partisan "bill. In case you didn`t know,that means both parties,together,as in "on the same page".Hardly "far left",IMO. Perhaps it is where you`re standing,that makes me appear to be on the far left. A bit of advice.You handle your own self,and I`ll handle my end.Don`t worry or fret over me or my politics.I promise I won`t think about you.Ok?
_____________________________
When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."
|