hardbodysub
Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005 Status: offline
|
It seems to me that people often relate their own feelings quite innocently, without any implied disdain for opposing viewpoints, but unless they explicity include a disclaimer like "this is just my preference, yours is just as good", they often get taken to task for it. I feel that we should generally assume no offense without explicit cause. Kind of an "innocent unless clearly guilty" way of looking at it. On the other hand, I think that questioning or disparaging someone else's preference is crossing the line, and shouldn't be acceptable. I say that knowing that I may actually have been guilty of it myself, in reply to the same directed at me. For example, if I write that severe corporal punishment is very important to me [it's not, this is just an example], someone could post an opposing point of view in two different ways: (1) they could say that they prefer more gentle correction, or that they can't handle severe physical punishment, or whatever their preference is in regard to corporal, or (2) they could say "Why in the world would you care about that? That's not being submissive, that's topping from the bottome ...", etc., etc., ad nauseum. In my opinion, the second one crosses the line. It doesn't just state their preference, it attacks mine. I think the first one is fine. Now, if the OP clearly requests replies related to techniques or implements to help with severe corporal, that the topic is not a discussion of the relative merits of physical vs. mental, S&M vs D/s, then I think even a (1)-type response is out of line because it's off topic. There's also a vague implication that the writer just can't stand to see someone talking about a preference that differs from theirs, without putting their own two cents in. I often challenge people's opinions or logic, but I do try to avoid challenging preferences. They just are. Nothing to debate. What do you think? Are we too thin-skinned in general, and see offense where it didn't really exist? What crosses the line, and what doesn't?
|