lucern
Posts: 54
Joined: 11/13/2004 Status: offline
|
Popeye, if it was published research I'd have posted a reference so that you could see for yourself. It wasn't. The data and results are real though. The data comes from the General Social Survey: http://publicdata.norc.org:41000/gssbeta/index.html . It's a cross section of thousands of Americans from all over. Anyone can download the stats, but you'll need a computer program to make use of them. The site has lots of articles using the stats, as well as some weighing the usefulness of the survey in general. I ran SPSS (data analysis software) on the relevant variables as part of a class on social science statistics. You compare variables, and some come up significant. The trends I mentioned are real at least up to 2004. Naturally, they don't indicate questions like why, or what processes lead to the trends, or other things like that. Everyone else in the class, since it was a class assignment, came up with the same answers. And no, there weren't any indications for fiscally liberal or conservative for enough years to account for that time span. There probably should be. The political variables had to do with which side you tended to vote for, IIRC. The nature of stats is that they do not have to account for your experiences or my experiences. They usually get 1000 or so experiences, put the answers in a database, and tell us whether or not there is a statistical difference between variables. That means that there will be Univesity post-docs who love Rush Limbaugh and 6th grade dropouts who have holy altars to Ted Kennedy. There will be globetrotting conservatives and liberals who have never left their block. There will be old liberals and young conservatives. There will be billionaire liberals and impoverished conservatives. It tells us that the trends of each of these statements are opposite, that's all. That's percentages of people, not everyone. Stats, like all evidence, are only part of the story.
|