RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant...

RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Alumbrado -> RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant... (8/30/2007 9:25:27 AM)
[sm=biggrin.gif]

farglebargle -> RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant... (8/30/2007 9:26:07 AM)
"And it wouldn`t even have to be her,anyone who works for her,from the highest ranking,to the lowest staffer,can do the spying." Given that it's running on the INSECURE Microsoft Windows platform, and they're using ADMIN LEVEL rights for every user? There is no way to tell WHO is using such a system, and for what purposes.

luckydog1 -> RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant... (8/30/2007 10:32:00 AM)
Hillary didn't need any such power to illegally pass around FBI files of Republicans and media figures. even left them in a room with a photocopier and Her dirty tricks guy Craig Livingstone, who fled the country to avoid testifying about the matter. Still in hiding..... The Democratic congress did just pass a law making this legal. And the constitution does mandate ensuring the common defense as part of the Feds role, and intell gathering has allways been a part of that. The idea that no intell can be gathered with out a specific warrant is nonsense, and has never been the law.

farglebargle -> RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant... (8/30/2007 11:48:40 AM)
Exactly when did intel gathering, outside of a Congressionally Declared War, start? Oh, and "Providing for the common defense?" That MEANS the Feds should subsidize the purchase of small arms and training ammunition, so that The People can do what needs to be done. It doesn't mean putting a point-and-click interface on unlawfully recording YOUR telephone calls.

Griswold -> RE: I missed the step where they get the warrant... (8/30/2007 5:29:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2007/08/wiretap More interesting is the question: "Who else has hacked into/has access to our phone call recordings?" JUST Foreign Spies? Commercial Spies? IDENTITY THEFT gangs? Terrorist networks? After all, it says it runs on Windows... So that means that it's already guaranteed insecure! ( And it can't play a MP3 without trashing your network connection, but that's another story... ) quote: What DCSNet Can Do Together, the surveillance systems let FBI agents play back recordings even as they are being captured (like TiVo), create master wiretap files, send digital recordings to translators, track the rough location of targets in real time using cell-tower information, and even stream intercepts outward to mobile surveillance vans. FBI wiretapping rooms in field offices and undercover locations around the country are connected through a private, encrypted backbone that is separated from the internet. Sprint runs it on the government's behalf. The network allows an FBI agent in New York, for example, to remotely set up a wiretap on a cell phone based in Sacramento, California, and immediately learn the phone's location, then begin receiving conversations, text messages and voicemail pass codes in New York. With a few keystrokes, the agent can route the recordings to language specialists for translation. The KGB and Stasi would be proud! Let's just clarify all this shit right fucking now. I hacked in to your shit. I know everything you said....and I'm telling every fuckingbody I know. I know what you're doing. Don't try to fucking hide it....I know what's going on....and if I don't start seeing some fucking cash....your days are numbered. (I've spoken my piece).

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375