missturbation
Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006 From: another planet Status: offline
|
My apologies for appearing to abandon my own thread but i've been busy working UR2Bador4ed - Though it may remove us from the joy of comparison which I believe exists. Would not the joy of compassion be it's equal? Technically no as compassion is a feeling and comparison is not. The joy of compassion is comparable to happiness from others suffering and yes i would feel more joy from the first. SugarMyChurro - I think you need to consider Pierre Klossowski in terms of the significant art and philosophical movements of his times. Dada and surrealism must be factored in while also giving particular attention to Georges Bataille's notions of "transgression I'm not sure whether to ask you not to patronise me here or to just say thank you lol. Considering i am studying all that is De Sade and philosophy and theory of the time i think i might just have taken into account that it is dated. At the end of the day, most pleasure is deeply internal for all individuals alike. De Sade himself wrote much of his most famous material while in the Bastille, so he was absolutely in the deepest hole of his own misery when writing his most sublime texts. I'm aware most of his works were written whilst imprisoned. I would however beg to differ that his internments were the most miserable times of his life. However this isnt a De Sade history topic. The Klossowski idea is almost a throw away; but it might lead toward some engaging imagery and thoughts while you entertain the idea as being true and correct. That's the sole purpose of some ideas - momentary illumination based on a seemingly plausible idea that disappears entirely under a harsher light and much closer scrutiny. I don't believe that it is a throw away. I know people that find happiness from others misery and basically that is what we are talking about here. The idea in his theory does not dissappear but the attempt at justifying or reasoning it out does not hold too well i agree. Joseff - Same old "there can't be good without evil, can't be light without dark" BS. Quite frankly, I don't have to taste dirt to know chocolate tastes good. Look a little deeper. BossyShoeBitch - I'll take the opposing viewpoint. When I see people that are unhappy or are facing tough obstacles and I help them it makes me happy inside knowing I've helped other human beings. Every ying has to have its yang - thank you. SimplyMichael - That theory was written by and for the wealthy to assuage their guilt for living off the sweat and misery of others. Actually its a theory written to try and explain why De Sades 'nature as the one true ruler of man' philosophy doesn't quite work. It refers more to the libertine than the rich man or the poor. Consider this, if we measure ourselves by the state of others, we place more importance on them than us. By the theory that follows on from the joy of comparison anyone who gains joy by someone elses sadness actually lowers themself to the status of nothing. The jist is that to treat someone so despicably, to torture them and gain great happiness from their suffering we lower them to a status of nothing. If they are nothing then the acts we are commiting against them are nothing and in turn makes our happiness and ourselves nothing.
_____________________________
What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb. If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it. Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!
|