Control Freaks

Control Freaks (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LATEXBABY64 -> Control Freaks (8/6/2007 11:51:53 AM)
why is when you do something in the lifestyle that someone may not feel it is right they make it their obligation to take something positive and informative and trash it or change for their benefit. I have found this in chat rooms and on certain sites and other things. if freedom of speech was held with those same bonds we would never ever be able to have lifestyle anything. I for one think it is petty. do you find this in clubs or orgs or even on other sites.. while every thing has rules speaking about things in rt or life should not be censored... it is form of positive education for the the betterment of all. to infringe of on such things is setting a double standard... your take on this

mnottertail -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 11:54:13 AM)
if you do it 'outside the lifestyle' it comes to the same ignominious end. Ron

LaTigresse -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 11:54:40 AM)
I am terribly sorry but the intent of your post is escaping me. Could you clarify please.

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 11:55:39 AM)
quote: why is when you do something in the lifestyle that someone may not feel it is right they make it their obligation to take something positive and informative and trash it or change for their benefit. I dunno, why have you done that? Because you have on several topics. quote: I have found this in chat rooms and on certain sites and other things. if freedom of speech was held with those same bonds we would never ever be able to have lifestyle anything. I for one think it is petty. do you find this in clubs or orgs or even on other sites.. while every thing has rules speaking about things in rt or life should not be censored... it So you're upset that people use free speech, and then upset when speech is limited? If you're going to use someone else's equipment to send your message, you have to abide by their rules.

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 11:59:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I am terribly sorry but the intent of your post is escaping me. Could you clarify please. couple and does not like couple b so anything they do or say they goto a dungeon master cause they may not like the way they scene and prevent them from sceneing. kinda like a power trip like being booted for bringing up a right wing comment vs a left one

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:01:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross quote: why is when you do something in the lifestyle that someone may not feel it is right they make it their obligation to take something positive and informative and trash it or change for their benefit. I dunno, why have you done that? Because you have on several topics. quote: I have found this in chat rooms and on certain sites and other things. if freedom of speech was held with those same bonds we would never ever be able to have lifestyle anything. I for one think it is petty. do you find this in clubs or orgs or even on other sites.. while every thing has rules speaking about things in rt or life should not be censored... it So you're upset that people use free speech, and then upset when speech is limited? If you're going to use someone else's equipment to send your message, you have to abide by their rules. when have i ever done anything for my benefit ...its not about me when did this become a me thing the lifestyle is a we thing just the way it is

MHOO314 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:04:03 PM)
*Dearest latex,* If you visit My yahoo 360 blog, you will see that I posted something very similar in My vanilla life---for months, I struggled with who I was, when what was happening, it was being clouded by what others thought I should do/be---but this is not about Me--you question--we are a world of busy bodies---we make oursleves feel better by belittling others, I am not free from that sin either I am afraid---My grandmother used to say, "We demean in others the things we like least in ourselves"---at times that holds true. It does get irritating, however, I am far from blameless as well.

CutieMouse -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:08:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LATEXBABY64 [C]ouple a[nd] does not like couple b, so anything they [couple a] do or say, they [couple b] go to a dungeon master [to complain/report/whatever], cause they [couple b] may not like the way they [couple a] scene, and prevent them [couple a] from sceening. [K]inda like a power trip; like being booted for bringing up a right wing [political] comment vs a left one It would be far easier to understand and respond to your posts, if you imporved your written communication skills.

LaTigresse -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:09:00 PM)
It is human nature. The best you can hope for is to inspire by personal example.

LaTigresse -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:10:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CutieMouse quote: ORIGINAL: LATEXBABY64 [C]ouple a[nd] does not like couple b, so anything they [couple a] do or say, they [couple b] go to a dungeon master [to complain/report/whatever], cause they [couple b] may not like the way they [couple a] scene, and prevent them [couple a] from sceening. [K]inda like a power trip; like being booted for bringing up a right wing [political] comment vs a left one It would be far easier to understand and respond to your posts, if you imporved your written communication skills. And those that live in glass houses...........

SimplyMichael -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:33:00 PM)
I wonder why someone who is suposedly real life and experienced gives a rat's ass about chatrooms. As for booting people out, I think we should throw more people out, it would make things much more pleasant and drama free for the rest of us.

MisPandora -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:38:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I am terribly sorry but the intent of your post is escaping me. Could you clarify please. I'd wager that he's ticked over a post he made in direct violation of the site's TOS being pulled. IMO, it's disrespectful to deliberately post things that will get the rest of us into legal hot water, not to mention awfully discourteous to the owners of the site.

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:39:31 PM)
maybe cause no one person has the right to censor anything.. not when it is made to the public.. civil rights are just that.. when we try to censor speach.. when it is the best interest of all ...we are no better then the goverment or other institutions...

Lashra -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:40:53 PM)
I personally do not give a fuck what other people do. I will do whatever it is that I please and if others don't like it, who cares? ~Lashra

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:43:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LATEXBABY64 maybe cause no one person has the right to censor anything.. not when it is made to the public.. civil rights are just that.. when we try to censor speach.. when it is the best interest of all ...we are no better then the goverment or other institutions... Well the US government IS "we" What makes you think a privately owned chat room or cyber forum is somehow subject to civil rights?

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:43:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lashra I personally do not give a fuck what other people do. I will do whatever it is that I please and if others don't like it, who cares? ~Lashra here here Miss Lashra I second that

MHOO314 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:45:13 PM)
*Woohoo!!!! Nicely stated!*

LATEXBABY64 -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:47:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MisPandora quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I am terribly sorry but the intent of your post is escaping me. Could you clarify please. I'd wager that he's ticked over a post he made in direct violation of the site's TOS being pulled. IMO, it's disrespectful to deliberately post things that will get the rest of us into legal hot water, not to mention awfully discourteous to the owners of the site. While in refernce to that post it was taken out of context.. there was nothing illeagle or wrong with it and if you are doing something you should not be doing thats on you... all things come full Circle yep yep

LaTigresse -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:47:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MisPandora quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I am terribly sorry but the intent of your post is escaping me. Could you clarify please. I'd wager that he's ticked over a post he made in direct violation of the site's TOS being pulled. IMO, it's disrespectful to deliberately post things that will get the rest of us into legal hot water, not to mention awfully discourteous to the owners of the site. Ah haaaaaaaa, now the childish drama all makes sense! Thank you.

MisPandora -> RE: Control Freaks (8/6/2007 12:50:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LATEXBABY64 maybe cause no one person has the right to censor anything.. not when it is made to the public.. civil rights are just that.. when we try to censor speach.. when it is the best interest of all ...we are no better then the goverment or other institutions... Well, you're half correct. If this were a publicly-owned or government website, perhaps your Constitutional plight might be more right on. But in the realm of a privately owned and operated entity where you are a guest, I don't think you are entitled to the same protections and freedoms. You yourself signed an agreement with an electronic signature that stated what you consented to -- including restriction of speech based on restricted topics here on this site. If you disagree with that, you're welcome to create your own site that allows discussions of all things illegal, and open yourself to liability of other's speech impacting your freedoms (like staying out of jail for discussing unmentionables.)

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.515625E-02