|
PrincessKimba -> RE: fafe dommes (7/17/2007 10:52:47 AM)
|
I'm not actually sure what constitutes a "fake" to the list. I have recieved a disheartening amount of harassment due to this profile, which is a shame because I am indeed a genuine person.
The whole thing is boring me now though. I believe I have enough information on my profile for intelligent people to make up their own minds (I suppose I can think of this as a stupidity filter!) and I strongly dislike feeling the need to prove myself. But for the benefit of those who are confused by this misunderstood fetish, I'd just like to explain a little about the sort of financial slavery I am interested in, taken from my journal. This specifically applies to me, but I'm sure a lot of others accused as well.
Power exchange of money in a real loving monogamous relationship isn't something I need, but to be realistic for a lot of older gentlemen especially, the idea of being taken shopping by an attractive young lady, having their credit card taken off them at the beginning of the day and dragged around the shops, made to buy everything, carry the bags etc is a great turn on and a positive experience to all involved.
It's a control fetish based on a Dominant and submissive interaction. Therefore it belongs within the D/s element of BDSM.
I also use this as a form of punishment. Punishments are not meant to be fun, and this is a satisfying way to degrade and humiliate a man enough to really make him feel used.
Obviously there are limits, and the financial part is by no means the whole or even that much of a large part of any relationship that comes out of this for me. However, I do have a Dom myself that I am in a real life relationship with, though I am entirely Dominant toward any other than he and I keep my own subs, but I am not looking for love or forever here.
The idea of economical slavery is very scary to many people as it is infested with fakes and not properly understood or regulated by mature, caring individuals. The same is true of other BDSM based taboos such as the Gorean lifestyles and the OWK, but when done correctly it is completely mutually beneficial.
I'm not just some retarded 18 year old. I know my stuff on this topic - more than the majority of people have bothered to think about, explore or try.
That's my take on it and you're entitled to yours. If you don't like it, please don't try and insult me simply because you don't agree, just move along and find something you're into.
I belong here just as much as you do.
I agree with the prospect of naming and shaming con-artists in principle, but only when the facts are straight and people aren't put up purely from "suspicion" or for just having fetishes that a few people don't agree with. Only when they are actually proven con-artists who aren't doing what they claim to be doing in their profiles.
|
|
|
|
